University
of
Washington
GEOG
349:
Geography
of
International
Trade
Autumn 2010
Contents of this syllabus:
COURSE SYNOPSIS
This content of this course can be expressed as a matrix of theory, policy, practice, and effects
of international trade and
foreign
direct investment.
INSTRUCTOR, TIMES, and PLACES
Professor
James
W. Harrington; 416C Smith Hall; jwh@u.washington.edu;
206-616-3821; fax 206-543-3313
Class meetings: TTh 9:30 -
11:20 a.m., Smith Hall 105
Office Hours: TTh 1:00 - 2:00
p.m.
and by appointment
STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES
By the end of the quarter, a highly successful student
will:
- Be able to articulate learning goals relevant to the
course, and assess progress
toward
them.
- Learn the basic outlines of world trade patterns, and
explain
these outlines using international trade theory (ITT).
- Use an understanding of ITT and its assumptions to
understand and
assess the critiques of liberalized trade policy.
- Gain empirical grounding in the trade relationships of
Canada,
China, or Mexico, emphasizing the trade patterns and trends with the
United States.
- Distinguish the varied forms of international business
(IB), and
the choice criteria among them.
- Ask and begin to answer questions about the logistics of
international trade.
- Present a nuanced perspective on trade-policy
recommendations for
the United States and one other country, to benefit each side.
INSTRUCTOR'S
TEACHING
OBJECTIVES
As instructor, my objectives are to:
- present lectures and on-line notes that provide both
substantive
content and some synthesis of readings and assignments;
- design individual and interactive activities that get
students to
do something and thereby learn the material, in addition to passive
listening and reading;
- give assignments and tests that assess the learning
objectives;
- assess students in ways that reward individual effort while
encouraging students' learning from each other.
REQUIREMENTS
Meetings and readings. The
course meets twice a week; each student needs to be at each
meeting. (I will not take attendance, but we'll have frequent
in-class exercises). Read the assigned
material before the class; we will discuss and at times have
in-class exercises to reinforce the assigned readings.
The assigned readings are listed in full
below,
and are referenced in the Schedule. To check library reserves
online, go to http://catalog.lib.washington.edu/search/r?SEARCH=geog+349.
(You
can
also
find
this
by
going
from
the UW
homepage to "Libraries" to
"Electronic Reserves".) Several of the articles below are
available online through the UW Libraries links
to
electronic
journals. (You have to log into the Libraries website
using your UWNetID.)
Citation
|
Access
|
Ahearne,
A. et
al. 2007. Global Imbalances: Time for Action. Policy
Brief 07-4, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
|
available
online |
Atkinson,
G. and Hamilton,
K. 2002. International trade and the 'ecological balance of
payments.' Resources Policy 28: 27-37.
|
UW
Libraries |
Bergsten, C.F., Gill, B., Lardy, N.R.,
and Mitchell, D. 2006. China in the world economy:
opportunity or threat? Ch.4 in China: The Balance Sheet.
New
York:
Public
Affairs.
|
E-reserve
|
Bosworth, B.P., Collins, S.M., and
Lustig, N.C., eds. 1997. Coming Together?
Mexico-United States Relations. Washington DC:
Brookings Institution Press.
|
OUGL-reserve
|
Boughton,
J.M. and Bradford, C.I. 2007.
Global governance: new players, new rules. Finance &
Development (Dec.): 10-14.
|
available
online |
Breau, S.
and Rigby, D.L. 2010. International trade
and wage inequality in Canada. Journal of Economic Geography 10:
55-86. |
UW
Libraries |
Clement,
N.C. et al.
1999. North American Economic Integration: Theory and
Practice. Cheltenham, UK: Edward
Elgar. |
OUGL
reserve |
Dadush,
U. and Nielson, J. 2007.
Governing global trade. Finance & Development
(Dec.): 22-25. |
available
online |
(DRS) Daniels, J.D.,
Radebaugh, L.H.,
and Sullivan, D.P. 2007. International Business: Environments and
Operations, 11th ed. Upper Saddle River NJ: Pearson
Prentice Hall. |
E-reserve
(selected chapters);
Opt’l
purch;
OUGL reserve
|
Davidson, C. and Matusz,
S.J.
2004. International Trade and Labor
Markets: Theory, Evidence, and Policy Implications. Kalamazoo MI:
W.E. Upjohn Institute.
|
OUGL
reserve
|
Dicken, P. 2007. Global
Shift:
Mapping
the
Changing
Contours
of
the
World
Economy, 5th
ed. New York: Guilford Press. |
Req’d
purch
|
Elliott,
K.A. 2004. Labor Standards,
Development, and CAFTA. Policy Brief 04-2, Institute for
International Economics. |
available
online |
Faber,
B. 2007. Towards the spatial patterns of
sectoral adjustments to trade liberalization: the case of NAFTA in
Mexico. Growth and Change
38(4): 567-594. |
UW
Libraries |
Fallows, J.
2007. China makes, the
world takes.The Atlantic 300(1): 48-72.
|
E-reserve
|
Guthrie, D.
2006. China
and Globalization: The Social, Economic, and Political Transformation
of
Chinese Society. New York: Routledge
|
OUGL
reserve
|
Hakim, P. and Litan,
R.E., eds. 2002. The Future of North American
Integration. Washington DC:
Brookings Institution Press. |
OUGL reserve |
Hart, M. 2002. A
Trading Nation: Canadian Trade Policy from Colonialism to Globalization.
Vancouver
BC:
UBC
Press.
|
OUGL
reserve
|
Huang, R.R. 2007.
Distance and trade: disentangling
unfamiliarity effects and transport cost effects. European Economic Review 51(1):
161-181. |
UW Libraries |
Hummels, D. 2007.
Transportation costs and
international trade in the second era of globalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives
21(3): 131-154. |
UW Libraries |
Kletzer, L.G.
2002. Understanding the links between increasing foreign competition
and domestic employment and job
loss. Ch. 2 in Imports,
Exports, and Jobs: What Does Trade Mean for Employment and Job Loss?
Kalamazoo MI: W.E.
Upjohn Institute.
|
E-reserve;
book at OUGL
|
Leichenko, R.M. 2000.
Exports, employment, and
production: a causal assessment of U.S. states and regions. Economic Geography 76(4): 303-325. |
UW Libraries |
Liu, H., Xi, Y., Guo, J., and Li, X. 2010. Energy
embodied in the international trade of China: an energy input-output
analysis. Energy Policy
38: 3957-3964. |
UW Libraries |
MacDonald, I.T.
2003. NAFTA and
the emergence of continental labor cooperation. The
American Review of Canadian Studies 33(2): 173-196.
|
E-reserve
|
MacDonald, L.I., ed.
2000. Free Trade: Risks and
Rewards. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press. |
OUGL
reserve |
Peters, G.P. and Hertwich,
E.G. 2006. Pollution embodied in trade: the Norwegian
case. Global Environmental
Change 16: 379-387. |
UW
Libraries |
Rodrik, D. 1996.
Labor standards in
international trade: do they matter and what do we do about them? Ch.2
in Emerging Agenda for
Global Trade: High Stakes for Developing Countries, ed. by R.Z.
Lawrence, D. Rodrik, and J. Whalley. Washington DC: Overseas
Development Council.
|
OUGL
reserve
|
Sun, H. and Parikh,
A. 2001. Exports, inward foreign direct investment (FDI)
and regional economic growth in China. Regional Studies 35(3): 187-196. |
UW Libraries |
Waldkirch, A. 2010. The
effects of foreign direct investment in Mexico since NAFTA. The World Economy 33(5): 710-745. |
UW Libraries |
Whalley, J.
1996. Trade and
environment, the WTO, and the developing countries. Ch.3 in Emerging
Agenda
for
Global
Trade:
High
Stakes
for
Developing
Countries, ed. by R.Z. Lawrence, D. Rodrik, and J.
Whalley. Washington DC: Overseas Development Council.
|
OUGL
reserve
|
Papers. There are two
research-paper assignments to help students toward the
learning
objectives. Each student will focus on Canada, China, or Mexico,
for both papers. You'll want to make use of the information
resources that specialist librarian Amanda Hornby has compiled and
the
instructor's guide
to
formatting
papers.
In addition to readings assigned for
specific
class meetings, general trade policy issues are discussed by:
Clement et al.
Davidson & Matusz (re labor issues)
Dicken, Chs.17-19
Economist
series
Rodrik 1996 (re labor issues)
Whalley in Lawrence et al.
(re environmental issues)
Canadian trade issues (including some subnational, regional issues) are
discussed by:
Hart
Clement et al.
Davidson & Matusz (provides empirical work on labor impacts)
Hakim & Litan Ch.2
MacDonald 2000 (all students focusing on Canada must read Hart's
chapter for Paper 1; other chapters will be useful)
MacDonald 2000 Part Four on environmental issues
MacDonald 2003 (re labor issues)
Chinese trade policy issues are discussed by:
Bergsten et al., Ch.4
DRS, pp. 364-7
Fallows
Guthrie, Chs. 4 & 8
Mexican trade policy issues are discussed by:
Bosworth et al.
Clement et al.
Hakim & Litan Ch.3
MacDonald 2000: chapters on Mexico; Part Four on
environmental issues
First
paper. Decsribe the changes in your country's largest
trade partners, export sectors, import sectors, and amount of inward
FDI over the past 30 years. What does this suggest are your
country's sources of comparative advantage, and has that changed over
the 30 years? Describe changes in your country's trade policies
over that time period. Do those changes help explain the changes
in trade partners and sectors? Are there other domestic policies
that have had a major effect on the country's trade patterns?
Use
materials referenced in
this syllabus, data sources available through UW Libraries, and at
least three additional good
references. Try to limit your writing to 3000 words.
Second
paper. First, you’ll need to decide whether you’ll focus
on
- a sector (e.g., automobiles, clothing, financial services,
etc.),
- an interest (e.g., energy resources, environmental impacts,
unskilled labor, or skilled manufacturing labor), or
- a subnational region (e.g., Canada’s oil and gas region,
Canada’s
manufacturing belt, China’s southeast or northeast, Mexico’s border
regions, northern provinces, or agricultural south).
Explain what traditional trade theory would suggest are the likely
impacts of increased international trade between your country and the
US on that sector, interest, or region. (You'll have to do some
reading and thinking to come up with this). Then, do some
empirical research (using peer-reviewed articles or books, or using
secondary data collected by national censuses) to assess what the actual impacts have been.
Explain how and why the actual impacts conform
or do not conform to expectations drawn from trade theory.
Explain one policy measure that your country has developed to try to
ameliorate a negative impact or to increase a positive impact.
Use
materials referenced in this syllabus (see the
suggestions above; Part 3 of Dicken's book provides global
overviews of several sectors), information
resources available through UW Libraries, and at least three additional good references.
Try to limit your writing to 3000 words. See the linked grading
rubric for this paper.
Tests.
There
will be two in-class tests (4 November and 9 December): they
will
not be explicitly cumulative. Each test will likely employ a
range of question formats.
Response papers.
Each
student
will
prepare
six
500-word
responses
to
questions
that
I
will
provide
to
guide
your
reading
of
assigned
articles
(see
the
schedule
of
topics
and
assignments,
below).
These
are
due
at
the
beginning
of
the
relevant
class
meeting,
during
which
we
will
discuss
the
responses
in groups.
GRADING
Grades on tests and assignments.
Each
test
and
assignment
will
be
graded
on
a
percentage
basis.
Content,
clarity,
writing,
and
format
all
count
in
the
grading
of
the
assignments.
Be
especially
careful
about plagiarism:
more
than
three
words
in
the
order
you
read
them
somewhere
else
(including
on
the
WWW,
including
my
own
lecture
notes)
must
be set off
in quotation marks and given a full citation.
Late assignments. Tests
must be
taken on the scheduled day, except by prior arrangement with the
instructor or ex post written communication with the instructor
based on illness (in this latter circumstance, the instructor will need
documentation of your illness or that of someone in your care;
this will be handled on a case-by-case basis). Other assignments
are due at the beginning of the specified class period; 20% of
the assignment's value will be deduced for material submitted after the
specified class but by the following class period; 50% of the
assignment's value will be deducted for material submitted later than
this, until 5:00 p.m. Friday 10 December.
Final grades. The final
grade
for the course will be calculated as follows. Each graded item
can contribute up to a specified number of points toward the quarter's
total that can equal up to 100 points. Each student’s final grade
reflects the number of these 100 points the student has earned during
the quarter.
Table 1: Schedule of Assignments and Points
Response
papers
1-6,
@
4
points
each |
24
|
2
tests, @ 18 points each |
36
|
2
papers, @ 20 points each |
40
|
TOTAL
possible
points
|
100
|
Total scores (on a scale of 0 - 96) will translate into final grades
(on a scale of 0.0 - 4.0) approximately according to the scale
below: the instructor may be more lenient than
this.
Table 2: Schedule of Points and Grades
TOTAL SCORE
|
FINAL GRADE
|
86.5 - 96+ points |
3.6 - 4.0
|
72.0 - 86.4 points |
2.5 - 3.5
|
57.5 - 71.9 points |
1.5 - 2.4
|
48.0 - 57.4 points |
0.7 - 1.4
|
0 - 47.9 points |
0.0
|
Incomplete work. [From the University
Registrar's
website] A grade of “I” (Incomplete) is given
only when the student has been in attendance and has done
satisfactory work until within two weeks of the end of the
quarter and has furnished proof satisfactory to the instructor that the
work cannot be completed because of illness or other circumstances
beyond the student's control. To obtain credit for the course, an
undergraduate student must convert an Incomplete into a passing grade
no later than the last day of the next quarter. The student should
never reregister for the course as a means of removing the Incomplete.
An Incomplete grade not made up by the end of the next quarter is
converted to the grade of 0.0 by the Registrar unless the instructor
has indicated, when assigning the Incomplete grade, that a grade other
than 0.0 should be recorded if the incomplete work is not completed.
The original Incomplete grade is not removed from the permanent record.
SCHEDULE (with
links
to
on-line
notes;
optional
reading
in
parentheses)
Date
|
Theme
|
Reading
|
Assignment
|
Th 9/30
|
Overviews
|
Overviews
and intro
The Economist, overview
Dicken,
Ch.1
|
|
Tu 10/05
|
What influences trade flows?
|
Dicken, Ch. 2
(Huang 2007)
(Hummels 2007)
|
RP1:
Essay on your
background, learning objectives, & country choice |
Th 10/07
Tu 10/12
|
International
Trade Theory (ITT)
|
Inductive
Theorizing
abt
Trade
ITT
notes
New trade theory
video 1; 2
DRS Ch.6, e-reserve
Leontief paradox
|
RP2:
Respond to questions re Dicken's
Ch. 2
|
Th 10/14
|
ITT/policy
|
Competitiveness
Trade
policy
DRS Ch.7, e-reserve
|
RP3:
Answer q’s on trade theory |
Tu 10/19
Th 10/21
|
Trade
policy
|
Boughton
&
Bradford
2007
Dadush
&
Nielson
2007
Fallows |
RP4: Q's
re Fallows
|
Tu 10/26
|
Economic integration
|
Economic
integration, 1
Economic
integration, 2
Dicken,
pp.180-4, 187-204
(DRS Ch.8) |
|
Th 10/28
|
Currency;
exchange rates
|
Currency
markets and foreign exchange
Ahearne
et
al.
2007
(DRS, pp. 353-63)
|
|
Tu 11/02
|
Paper 1
discussion; review
|
Review
Notes |
|
Th 11/04
|
Test 1
|
|
|
Tu 11/09
|
Forms
of
IB; FDI
Strategic management
|
Forms
& contexts
Dicken,
pp.106-17
(DRS Ch.14)
webnotes on strategic
thinking and international
operations; Dicken,
pp.153-68
|
Paper
1 due
|
Th
11/11
|
Veterans' Day holiday
|
|
|
Tu 11/16
|
International
marketing as
an example of integrating and implementing strategy
|
International
marketing
DRS Ch. 16, e-reserve |
In-class
learning from Paper 1 |
Th 11/18
|
Logistics |
Trade
logistics
The Economist on trade logistics
Dicken Ch.14 |
|
Tu 11/23
|
Macreoeconomic,
sectoral
&
subnational
effects
of
IT
&
FDI
|
All: Impact of
FDI; Dicken Ch.16; Dicken,
pp.13-23; 62-7
All:
Leichenko 2000
Can: Breau
& Rigby 2010
PRC: Sun
& Parikh 2001
Mex: Faber
2007 |
RP5: Q's on the
reading |
Th
11/25
|
Thanksgiving holiday
|
|
|
Tu 11/30
|
Labor
|
Impact of
trade on labor
Managing
nternational
human resources
"Workers of
the world"
Elliott
2004
MacDonald 2003 |
|
Th 12/02
|
Resources and
the natural environment
|
overview notes
Peters &
Hertwich 2006
Atkinson and Hamilton 2002
Liu et al. 2010
|
RP 6: Q's on the
reading
|
Tu
12/07
|
Corporate
strategies,
national
will |
Dicken Ch. 6
International
dimensions
of
strategic
decision
making
The Economist: The
diminished
state?
MNC-Government
negotiation |
|
Th 12/09
|
Test 2
|
see 11/27 notes
review
notes for second test
|
|
Mon
12/13
|
no class
meeting
|
|
Paper
2 due (see grading rubric)
|
copyright James W. Harrington, Jr.
revised 7 December 2010
|