Projects
Development and cross-validation of diffusion-approximation methods
Collaborators: John Sabo, ASU; Bill Fagan, UMaryland.
Real population processes are stochastic. Thus any analysis of population data must deal with this characteristic in some fashion. The pre-2000 approach was to interpret population data via models attributing variability within the data to either measurement error or process error alone. However, population data almost always contain multiple sources of variability: process error, measurement error, non-linear feedbacks, etc. Mis-attributing the sources of variability has multiple consequences ranging from misestimation of the population behavior to misestimation of the level of uncertainty associated with the data analysis. My research is focused on development of practical approaches for dealing with noisy data.
The motivation behind this work is to try to understand how complex a model we need to predict passage probabilities (i.e. quasi-extinction). It has been know for some time that often a simple random walk will fit observed population time series just as well as a more complex model would fit the data. Some days, I think about this as meaning that stochastic population processes can be written as linear component (the random walk) with non-linear components of higher and higher order added (like a Taylor series). The random walk (perhaps with drift) represents the first order term. Other days, I think about it as dominant and sub-dominant eigenvalues.
My research focuses on trying to estimate that random walk component and then testing, with large databases, the idea that this random walk can describe the bulk of the quasi-extinction behavior.
- Ellner, S. P. and E. E. Holmes. 2008. Commentary on Holmes et al. (2007), "A statistical approach to quasi-extinction forecasting". Ecology Letters 11: E1-E5.
- Hinrichsen, R. A. and E. E. Holmes. 2008. Using multivariate state-space models to study spatial structure and dynamics. In Spatial Ecology (editors Robert Stephen Cantrell, Chris Cosner, Shigui Ruan). CRC/Chapman Hall.
- Holmes, E. E., J. L. Sabo, S. V. Viscido, and W. Fagan. 2007. A statistical approach to quasi-extinction forecasting. Ecology Letters 10:1182–1198 Open Access PDF
- Fagan, W. F and E. E. Holmes. 2005. Quantifying the extinction vortex. Ecology Letters 9:51-60.PDF
- Holmes, E.E., W.F. Fagan, J.J. Rango, A. Folarin, J.A., Sorensen, J.E. Lippe, and N.E. McIntyre. 2005. Cross validation of quasi-extinction risks from real time series: an examination of diffusion approximation methods. U.S. Dept. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-67, 37 p. PDF
- Holmes, E. E. 2004. Beyond theory to application and evaluation: diffusion approximations for population viability analysis. Ecological Applications 14: 1272-1293. PDF
- Holmes, E. E. and B. Semmens. 2004. Population viability analysis for metapopulations: a diffusion approximation approach. Pp. 565-598 in Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution of Metapopulations, editors Illka Hanski and Oscar E. Gaggiotti. Elsevier Press. [Galleys (has eqn typos)] [Text with corrections]
- Sabo, J. L., E. E. Holmes, and P. Kareiva. 2004. The efficacy of simple viability models in ecological risk assessment: Does density dependence matter? Ecology 85: 328-341. PDF
- Holmes, E. E. and W. F. Fagan. 2002. Validating population viability analysis for corrupted data sets. Ecology 83: 2379-2386. PDF
- Holmes, E. E. 2001. Estimating risks in declining populations with poor data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 98: 5072-5077. PDF
Analysis of demographic changes in Steller sea lions
Collaborators: Lowell Fritz, NMML; Anne York, York Data Analysis.

From the mid-1970s through 2000, the western stock of Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus) declined by over 80%. This fish- and squid-eating predator, the largest eared seal (Otariidae), is distributed across the North Pacific Ocean. The western stock breeds on rookeries west of 144°W in Alaska and Russia and the eastern stock breeds to the east and south to the Channel Islands off California. In 1997, the western stock of Steller sea lion was listed as endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act, which created new challenges for managers of Alaska’s groundfish fishery, the most productive in the United States. Since 2000, over $120 million, the largest budget for a U.S. endangered species, has been devoted to reducing uncertainty about the factors negatively affecting the population: food limitation, killer whale predation, disease, and direct or indirect impacts from fishing. But despite well-funded and large-scale coordinated research, the complexity, indirectness and cumulative effects of these factors have made it difficult to determine which were responsible for the decline and which are primary threats to recovery. This project is focused on using population models combined with data on the numbers and age distribution of Steller sea lions in the central Gulf of Alaska to estimate the historical changes in survivorship and fecundity that drove the decline.
- Holmes, E. E. and A. E. York. 2003. Using age structure to detect impacts on threatened populations: a case study using Steller Sea Lions. Conservation Biology 17:1794-1806.
- Holmes, E. E., L. Fritz, A. York and K. Sweeney. Age-structured modeling reveals long-term declines in the natality of western Steller sea lions. Ecological Applications 17:2214–2232. PDF Appendices In earlier versions of this paper, we had longer appendices which discussed why we feel that sightability and sex-ratios have not changed sufficiently to explain the dropping pup to nonpup ratio. This was cut during the 2nd revision process. Earlier appendices
- EE Holmes, LW Fritz, AE York, & K Sweeney. Evidence of continuing declines in fecundity of Steller sea lions. Marine Mammal Society Meetings. San Diego, CA. December 2005. PDF of poster.
- EE Holmes & AE York. Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, WA Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, Invited speaker: “Monitoring the effect of management on long-lived species”. Olympia, WA. December 2004. PDF
- EE Holmes & AE York. Society for Conservation Biology Annual Meeting, Invited speaker for Symposium on Designing Marine Reserves for Marine Mammals, “Using age-structure to monitor long-lived marine mammals” Hawaii. June 2001.
Analysis of stochastic community data
Collaborators: Steven Viscido, NRC post-doctoral fellow.
Current ecosystem models such as EcoSim build a model of the strengths of species’ interactions within a community primarily via diet information combined with generally an assumed linear or non-linear function to describe how diet changes with changes in the density of individuals. This approach views the community interactions as deterministic and the data (such as diet data and population sizes) as observations, with error, of this deterministic process. Another approach views the community dynamics as stochastic and the data as one possible realization of this stochastic process. This approach has recently been proposed by Ives et al. 2003. This alternative approach uses in particular time series data of population estimates of the species within the community to statistically estimate a community model. Ives et al. use a particular type of stochastic process: a first-order multivariate (or vector) autoregressive process, abbreviated MAR(1). The first-order process implies that enough information can be obtained about a community at a single point in time to predict the immediate changes in species’ abundances. MAR(1) processes assume that the interactions among species, and between species and environmental variables, are linear (at after suitably transformed). Previous research (Ives 1995a, b) has demonstrated that MAR(1) models provide relatively simple approximations to nonlinear, non-first-order processes and therefore can be used to describe the general stochastic properties of complex communities. The advantages of this approach is that it provides a statistical framework for estimating a community model, and thus provides a statistical framework for comparing different possible models that might conceivably have produced the observed data. Diet data can still be used to help constrain the model but this is added as a constraint or as a prior in the estimation process. This approach may also provide a statistically rigorous procedure for estimating community models using the type of data typically available in a fisheries management setting, e.g. stock assessments and regular stock survey data.
The risk, of course, is that there simply is not enough information in count data to infer a community model. Then the question is how to use the information available to constrain the problem -- there are different philosophical approaches to that.
- Holmes, E. E. and P. M. Kareiva. 2000. Using single-species measurements to anticipate community level effects of environmental contaminants. In Environmental Contaminants and Terrestrial Vertebrates: Effects on Populations, Communities, and Ecosystems, P.H. Albers, G.H. Heinz, and H.M. Ohlendorf, editors. Published by the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), 315 pp.
- Two other papers are in prep on this as of May 2008: paper on LAMBDA (below) and a big robustness study
- Steven Viscido, Eli Holmes. Estimating population interactions and community stability from long-term datasets. Ecological Society Meetings, Montreal, Canada. August 2005.
Products
- L.A.M.B.D.A. Long-term Assemblage MAR(1)-Based Data Analysis. LAMBDA is a MatLab toolkit designed to do MAR-1 based data analysis on long-term datasets (i.e., time series). LAMBDA website
Review of ecosystem management plans
Collaborators: John Payne, NRC post-doctoral fellow; Ann Edwards.
Ecosystem Management (EM) has become a leading paradigm for natural resource management, and EM plans have been written by a wide variety of federal agencies, local governments and private conservation organizations such as The Nature Conservancy, often in response to explicit legal mandates. To ecologists, the challenge of ecosystem management is synonymous with the challenge of managing an intricate community of species interacting with a changing physical environment. Although ecosystems are extremely complex, ecologists agree on some basic ecosystem properties: 1) Ecosystems encompass a complex community of species, interacting non-linearly and dynamically. The strength and direction of linkages determine how impacts on one species radiate through a community. 2) Structure and diversity within communities affect ecosystem resilience, meaning the community’s robustness to perturbations and the ease of shifts between alternative stable states. 3) Uncertainty resulting from the complexity and non-linearity of the community dynamics limits our ability to predict how the ecosystem will respond to management. In order to understand how ecological principles have been incorporated into EM plans, we evaluated 20 EM plans written between 1990 and 2002 (3) using standardized criteria to score each plan. We limited our review to plans that were self-designated as ecosystem-management or written under an EM imperative and that were actual management plans with detailed implementation. The plans varied in size (from multi-state to single-reserve plans) and in primary intent (conservation, resource extraction, or restoration). All major U.S. natural resource management agencies were represented, and four plans were international.
- J Payne, EE Holmes(speaker), and AE Edwards, University of Idaho, Biology Dept., “Ecosystem management: vision versus practice”, November 2005
Science collaboration tools
Collaborators: Ben Weintraub, University of Washington.
Interactive web-based content collaboration and workshop tools.
- Minnow: Web-based content discussion tools for real-time discussion of scientific content, particularly PDF and PowerPoint files. Demo available at Minnow. Minnow is available for download also.
- Chinook: Simple web-based workshop development tools for interactive workshops and symposia. Beta-version up at iugo-cafe.org Available for download.
- Cichlid: A proto-type of an organic groups manager for scientific collaboration. This tool would allow scientific groups to create dynamic web collaborations sites easily, much like one creates groups on other types of community sites (such as Yahoo! Groups).
- Greenboxes: open-source code sharing for ecology Greenboxes website