Public Archaeology
ARCHY 465; SPRING 2014
M, W 10:30-12:20;
Denny 401

Overview Schedule
Assignments
Links Discussion

    M (3/31):  Introduction and orientation

    W (4/2): Public Attitudes about Archaeology:
What does the public really think about archaeology? We'll take a look at a             Harris Poll that asks that question, and read how archaeologists think we should be talking to this public audience. Is there a         disconnect between the attitudes of archaeologists and the public?   
                Readings:

                Zimmerman, Larry      
               
2003     Presenting the Past. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.pp. 1-14      
             
                Little, Barbara

                2002      Archaeology as a shared vision. In Public Benefits of Archaeology, pp. 3-19. B. Little, ed. University Press of                         Florida.

    SAA Harris Interactive Poll
    1999    Exploring Public Perceptions and Attitudes about Archaeology (look at both the summary and the more detailed         complete results)

    Assignment: (due by 9:00 AM today)

    The SAA Harris poll is now more than 15 years old. What has changed since then that might have affected public                 perceptions and attitudes about archaeology? Are there any new information sources? Post your answer on the course  discussion board
 
    M (4/7): Archaeology and Native Americans: Many Native Americans have long opposed how archaeologists handle Native         American ancestral sites, particularly when human remains are involved. We'll briefly review the history of this conflict, and         recent ongoing issues from Washington state.
    Readings:
    Thomas, David Hurst                
    2000      The Skull Wars: Kennewick man, archaeology, and the battle for Native American identity. New York: Basic Books, pp. 36-63 and  pp. 198-238

      Op-Ed articles in the Seattle Times (first and second).

     Film: Who Owns the Past (57 min)
 
    W (4/9): NAGPRA: Is this 1990 law an effective legal solution to conflicts about the past? We'll review how this radical piece         of human rights legislation came to be, and see how it works in practice. In the second half of class, we'll hear from a NAGPRA     professional about how repatriation really works in practice.        
       
Readings:
      
King 2013, pp. 264-274
       
       
King, Thomas F
    2002      Thinking about Cultural Resource Management: Essays from the edge. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, pp. 103-111

Optional readings:
We will review NAGPRA basics in class.
 
National NAGPRA websiteÑhas full text of law, regulations and lots of other information
 
Burke Museum Repatriation websiteÑhas some examples of recent repatriations from the Burke  

Assignment: (due by 9:00 AM today)
In 2003, a Federal Court determined that Kennewick Man or the Ancient One was not Native American and therefore not subject to NAGPRA. What do you think would have to happen to allow repatriation now? Post your anwer on the class Discussion Board.

Guest Speaker (11:30-12:20): Jess Milhausen, Burke Museum NAGPRA Coordinator

    M (4/14): no class: A great time to work on your Position Paper, draft due in one week.
  
    W (4/16):
Working with NAGPRA in the real world and repatriation outside the USA we discuss how repatriation of human     remains and other goods has been happening in many other countries. Do different social/political structures and histories             make for different practices in repatriation?
        Readings:
        Hubert, Jane and Cressida Fforde
        2002      Introduction: the reburial issue in the twenty-first century. In The Dead and their Possessions: Repatriation in                     principle, policy and practice, pp. 1-16. C. Fforde, J. Hubert and P. Turnbull, eds. Routledge, New York.
 
        Tapsell, Paul
        2002      Partnership in museums: A tribal Maori response to repatriation. In The Dead and their Possessions: Repatriation in         principle, policy and practice, pp.  284-292. C. Fforde, J. Hubert and P. Turnbull, eds. Routledge, New York.

          Assignment: (due by 9:00 AM today)
            So far, repatriation legislation is largely confined to the USA. Do you think such legislation would have support in another                 nation? Pick an example country and discsuss why or why not.  Post your anwer on the class discussion board.

    M (4/21): In class read-around: You will review and comment on your peers papers.

         Assignment:
        Position Paper Draft dueÑbring a printed copy of your paper to class

      
    W (4/23): The history of CRM in context: We'll start to investigate the origins of cultural resource management in the US.                 What social and political forces led to its rise in the late 19th century? How do they relate to current concerns about the                 past?                
      
               Readings:

    King 2013, pp. 1-54.
 
    Mapes, Lynda
    2009  Breaking Ground: The Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe and the Unearthing of the Tse-whit-zen Village. UW Press, Seattle.    
pp. 97-122
 
    M (4/28): The CRM legal framework: We'll review the various CRM laws and have a quiz on these laws in the second half of             class.
   ****Position papers returned with comments, revisions due in 1 week****
  Readings:
  Click here for quick and dirty CRM law summary
    
King 2013, chaps. 2 and 6 and appendices 1-3
  (you can skim these, but careful reading will help you study for the quiz)

Assignment: study for in class CRM law quiz today!
              
    W (4/30): Working in the CRM world: CRM laws have given rise to a large industry in the US to help people comply with them.     What are these jobs like? Is this a career that appeals to you? What skills do you need to get a job in CRM?
    Readings:
    King 2013, chap. 9.
 
    Bergman, Christopher and John Doershuk
    2003      Cultural Resource Management and the Business of Archaeology. In Ethical Issues in Archaeology, Zimmerman, Larry, Karen Vitelli and Julie Hollowell-Zimmer, eds., pp. 85-98. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
 
   SAA Archaeological Record, March 2004
    Scroll through this issue, which considers many issues related to archaeology training, including CRM

    Optional Readings (especially if you have not had a field school)
    SAA Bulletin field school article
    Field skills list
   
    M (5/5): The role of museums: Archaeology as a profession started in museums but now most archaeologists are employed         elsewhere. Do museums still have a role to play in public archaeology? What happens to all the stuff excavated by CRM                 projects?
    Readings:
    Trimble, Michael and Eugene Marino
    2003      Archaeological Curation: An ethical imperative for the twenty-first century. In Ethical Issues in Archaeology, Zimmerman, Larry, Karen     Vitelli and Julie Hollowell-Zimmer, eds., pp. 99-114. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
 
    Thomas, David Hurst
    2002      Roadside Ruins: Does America still need archaeology museums. In Public Benefits of Archaeology, pp. 130-145. B. Little, ed. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.
 
    Merriman, Nick
    2000      The crisis of representation in archaeological museums. In Cultural Resource Management in Contemporary Society, Francis McManamon and Alf Hutton. eds., pp. 300-309. Routledge, New York.

Assignment: (Due by class start today)
Revised Position Paper dueÑbring printed copies of first draft with comments AND revised paper (stapled together) to class
                              
    W (5/7):The future of CRM: How is this industry transforming? What are the prospects for careers in the next 5 years? What         role will tribes play? What is the status of CRM in other countries?    
            Readings:

            Stapp, Darby and Michael Burney
            2002      Tribal Cultural Resource Management: the full circle to stewardship. Alta Mira, Walnut Creek, pp. 72-90.
 
            King, Thomas
            2002      Lafayette where are you? The European Union, Cultural Heritage and CRM in the United States. In Thinking About             Cultural Resource Management, Essays from the Edge. Alta Mira Press.

Guest Speakers: CRM professional panel
              
    M (5/12): Field Trip to the Burke Museum, exhibits and archaeology collections
                Meet at the main entrance to the Burke Museum at 10:30
 
    W (5/14): How public should (or can) archaeology be? What are the limitations of public archaeology? Will there always be         inequities and privileged access to archaeological sites and information for certain people?
               Readings:
               Fagan, Brian
                1995         The arrogant archaeologist. In Archaeological Ethics, Karen Vitelli, ed., pp. 238-243. Alta Mira Press, Walnut                                 Creek.

               Can you dig it? Ethics and Archaeology. The Economist, March 30, 2002.

                St—:lō Heritage Policy Manual


                Assignment: (due at 9:00 AM today)
                Our class visited the Burke, and on your own time you will visit
Milepost 31, located in Pioneer Square, easily accessible                 by bus, open Tues-Sat 11-5. Write a short (500 words) review of your visits to Milepost 31 and the Burke Museum. In                     your review, address the following questions: 1) How does each site represent archaeology to the public? 2) What do                     you think should be done differently? Post your review on the class Discussion Board.

    M (5/19): Ethics, archaeology and the public: What is the current state of archaeological ethics? What role does the public             play in establishing, enforcing  and violating ethical standards?
            Readings:
Shapin, Stephen
1989    The Invisible technician. American Scientist 77:554-563.

Zimmerman, Larry
2008      Unusual or ÒExtremeÓ Beliefs about the Past, Community Identity, and Dealing with the Fringe. In Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities. Colwell-Chanthaphonh and T.J. Ferguson, eds., pp. 5-86. Alta Mira Press.

OÕNeil, Helen
2009   A townÕs love of Indian artifacts backfires: A recent federal sweep raises the question: Who, if anyone, owns the past? Associated Press.

        Guest Speakers:
       Rodrigo Solinis-Casparius, 10:30: role of field workers at excavations, links to communities
       Joss Whittaker, 11:30: role of general public and their interest in artifacts, sites

    W (5/21): No class (Suquamish CRM conference) 

Assignment: Project Drafts Due by 4:30 PM
email to me at plape@uw.edu

 
    M (5/26): No class, Memorial Day
 
    W (5/28):
Storytelling and the media and the messages, and wrap-up
            Readings
:  
         Berger, Knute
        Bertha tunnel dig: What CSI experts could tell us. Crosscut, March 18, 2014

        Dead-end discoveries? Crosscut, Aprl 6, 2011

            Allen, Mitch

            2002      Reaching the hidden audience: ten rules for the archaeological writer. In Public Benefits of Archaeology, pp.                         244-251. B. Little, ed. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.  
  
        Film: Ò60 MinutesÓ episode on Kennewick remains
 
        Guest speaker: Knute Berger, writer for Crosscut, Seattle Magazine and regular guest on KUOW

        Assignment: (due by 9:00 AM today)

        Find one story about archaeology from the past three years from the popular media (not an academic journal or                             archaeology specific magazine, not a reading already assigned for the class, could be video or written piece). Briefly                         summarize the story and explain how the author makes it relevant and/or interesting to the intended audience. Post a link to         the story along with your findings on the class Discussion Board.

    M and W (6/2 and 6/4):  Final project presentations
          Bring your score sheet to class  
 
    W (6/11):
Final Revised Proposals due by 4:30 PM
        drop your final paper attached to first draft and score sheet in my Denny Mezz mailbox or slip under my office door