English 345: American Independent Film

Essay 2 Grading Criteria

Has a substantive thesis and essay fully addresses the topic; the thesis is defendable, clearly explained, and supported in the body of the essay
If comparative, has a substantive thesis and fully analyzes how the two films explore a well-defined question; the thesis focuses on the significance of the films’ connections and presents a comparison that is defendable, clearly explained, and supported by the analysis
Shows substantial depth, fullness and complexity of thought
Expresses ideas clearly and commands the reader’s attention
Demonstrates clear, unified and coherent organization
Is fully developed and detailed with arguments supported by persuasive reasoning and references to films; there is an appropriate balance between providing evidence and analyzing that evidence
Has a sophisticated style (remarkable variety of sentence pattern, smooth transitions between ideas, superior control of diction)
Properly cites source material
Has few, if any, minor errors in grammar, usage or mechanics

Has a clear thesis that addresses the topic, but thesis may not address more significant aspects of the topic; the thesis may be clear and well-argued, but could use additional support; the essay may introduce points not expressed in the thesis; or the thesis may be discernible but not focused, with the essay addressing more aspects of the film(s) than can be adequately explored within the page limit
If comparative, has a clear thesis and essay analyzes how the two films explore a question, but thesis and essay may not fully address the significance of the films’ connections; the thesis may be clear and well-argued, but could use additional support throughout the essay; or the thesis may be identifiable, but not sharply focused
Shows some depth and complexity of thought
Expresses ideas clearly
Demonstrates effective organization
Is well developed with sensible reasoning and appropriate references to films; however, some evidence may detract from the thesis and some ideas might not be fully explored
Demonstrates balance between evidence and analysis for the most part, but balance may be weak in places
Has an effective style (some variety of sentence patterns, transitions between ideas, accurate diction)
Properly cites source material, but may have errors in citation format
Has few errors in grammar, usage or mechanics

Has a thesis that may not be entirely clear and essay does not fully analyze the film and topic; essay may mention many points and analyze few
If comparative, has a thesis that may not be entirely clear and essay does not fully analyze how the two films explore a particular question; essay may mention many points of comparison and analyze few
Shows insufficient awareness of the complexity of issues addressed; may treat the film(s) simplistically or repetitively
Communicates ideas clearly for the most part, but may have some lapses in clarity
Has a recognizable organizational pattern, but the relation among parts is not consistently clear enough to provide a coherent focus
Is unevenly developed; writer may offer sufficient reasoning or references to film(s) for some of the ideas but not for others
Demonstrates some balance between evidence and analysis
Has an adequate style (limited variation in sentence patterns, transitions between most ideas, diction accurate for the most part)
Cites the majority of source material, but occasionally material may be clearly cited but not referenced in parentheses
Has some errors in grammar, usage or mechanics, but demonstrates basic control of these areas

Has an unclear thesis; essay describes the films' elements and meets basic length requirements, but does not analyze the film(s) or treat the topic in any meaningful fashion
If comparative, has an unclear thesis; essay identifies similarities and differences and meets basic length requirements, but does not compare the films' treatment of a question in any meaningful fashion
Lacks focus or demonstrates confused thinking; essay conveys little conception of the issues raised by the film(s)
May not communicate ideas clearly
Is ineffectively organized, with no clear relationship between the parts of the essay
May not provide adequate or appropriate reasoning or references to support generalizations, or may provide details without generalizations
Demonstrates little relationship between evidence and the thesis
Has stylistic weaknesses (no variety of sentence patterns, few transitions, imprecise diction)
Indicates use of source material, but does not have consistent parenthetical references
Has occasional major errors in grammar, usage or mechanics or frequent minor errors that interfere in the reader's understanding of the essay

Has no thesis or has an incomprehensible thesis
May be deliberately off-topic and demonstrate no understanding of the issues addressed by the films
Does not communicate ideas clearly
Lacks coherent organization
Shows no development of ideas; may simply summarize films
Has an incoherent style (difficulties with sentence structure, pattern of diction errors)
Presents another writer’s work as the author’s own
Has pervasive pattern of errors in grammar, usage and mechanics that renders the essay unreadable