| Screening:
T, 12:30-3:20
Class:
Th, 12:30-2:20
 Room:
CMU 120
 Instructor
Kimberlee
Gillis-Bridges
 Padelford
A-305
 543-4892
 Hours
TTh
 10:30-12:00
 and by
appointment
 Last Updated:
1/23/02
Comments
or queries
 |   Presentations can fall
into one of the following categories:
 
On the course schedule,
I've noted which presentation types are possible for a given film. 
Whatever type of presentation you undertake, you must meet with me to discuss
ideas and to develop a research plan.  You must also attend the workshop
on cinema studies research methods scheduled for the second week of the
quarter.
Director/Production: 
Offers background information on the director and/or the film's production. 
Context(s): 
Provides information on the historical, political, or social contexts of
the film's year of production or the period the film represents.
Reception: 
Gives a summary of the film's critical reception, noting controversies
and foci of critical evaluation.
Literary Connections: 
Describes how the film has interpreted a literary source, translating it
into cinematic language.
National Cinema/Film
Movement: Explains how the film fits into stylistic and narrative trends
of a particular national cinema or film movement.
Scholarly Approach: 
Summarizes one scholarly analysis of the film. Presentations will be
graded on the following criteria:
 
Focus:  The
presentation addresses the assigned topic; each detail presented has a
clear relationship to the topic.  
Organization: 
The presentation has a logical structure; the progression of points is
easy to follow. 
Evidence: 
The speaker elucidates major points with sufficient details.  If the
speaker refers to specific sources, he or she cites those sources clearly. 
Depth:  Although
brief, the presentation is obviously well-researched.  The speaker
provides significant information about the topic rather than listing points
that provide little insight into the film, its production, its reception,
or its contexts. 
Speakers will receive a
0-4 ranking for each criterion, with 0 representing a missing component
and 4 representing exceptional execution of the criterion.  The presentation
grade constitutes an average of the rankings in each category.
Delivery: 
The speaker conveys points smoothly and adheres to the time limit. 
If the speaker provides a handout, the handout is well-prepared (titled,
readable) and plays an essential role in the presentation. 
 
 |