Figures for Kessler and Kleeman (1999)

• Figure AAA. Association of intraseasonal OLR with onset of El Niño.    (Overlay TAO wind intraseasonal RMS,    165°E-175°W,    175°E-165°W,    175°W-155°W,    155°E-175°E, 10°S-10°N,    OLR intraseasonal RMS along the Equator (overlay SST),    TAO zonal wind variance in frequency bands)
• Figure BBB. Idealized zonal wind anomalies on the equator.    (282)    (285)    (289)    (317)
• Figure CCC. Rectified SST and surface zonal current on the equator due to idealized MJO winds.

  Same figure for other runs:    Reversed wind phases (271).
  Stress forcing only (262)
  5 m/s winds (277)
  5 N/m2 winds (278)
  Gaussian stress (.0545N/m2) (281)
  Gaussian stress (.0682N/m2) (283)
  Sinusoidal stress (not wind) (.04N/m2) (282)    (Jan-Aug)
  Sinusoidal stress (.03N/m2) (285)    (Jan-Aug)
  Sinusoidal stress (.04N/m2) and cloud oscillations (286)    (Jan-Aug)
  Sinusoidal stress (.03N/m2) 10m/s (287)    (Jan-Aug)
  Sinusoidal stress (.02N/m2) (288)    (Jan-Aug)
  Sinusoidal stress (.03N/m2) (289)    (Jan-Aug)    (Finer contour levels)
  Sinusoidal stress (.03N/m2) (Reversed wspd phase) (290)    (Jan-Aug)
  Sinusoidal stress (.03N/m2) (120-day period) (316)
  Sinusoidal stress (.03N/m2) (90-day period) (291)
  Sinusoidal stress (.03N/m2) (Reverse phase of MJO stress) (292)
  Sinusoidal stress (.03N/m2) (Average of both MJO phases) (289+292)
  Sinusoidal stress (.03N/m2) (45-day period) (293)
  Sinusoidal stress (.03N/m2) (30-day period) (294)
  Sinusoidal stress (.06N/m2) (strong winds) (315)
  Sinusoidal stress (.035N/m2) (strongish winds) (317)
  Sinusoidal stress (.035N/m2) (start 1 July) (318)
  V strong Gaussian MJOs (321)
  

  Figures intercomparing runs: Difference due to wind speed (267-262)
  Compare 5 N/m2 winds - 6 N/m2 winds (278-267)
  Compare sinusoidal stress (4 N/m2) - sinusoidal winds (5 N/m2) (282-278)
  Compare gaussian stress (6.8 N/m2) - sinusoidal winds (5 N/m2) (283-278)
  Compare gaussian stress (6.82 N/m2) - sinusoidal stress (4 N/m2) (283-282)
  Compare two gaussian stresses (5.45 N/m2 - 6.82 N/m2) (281-283)
  Compare reversing windspeed phase (290-289)
  Compare reversing wind stress phase (292-289)
  Compare slightly stronger winds (317-289)
  Compare v strong Gaussian winds (321-289)

  SST difference from the control run as a function of MJO amplitude
  SST difference from the control run as a function of MJO period
  Time series of SST (2S-2N/150E-170E) as a function of MJO period
  Time series of SST along the equator as a function of MJO eastward propagation speed
  Time series of U along the equator as a function of MJO eastward propagation speed    60-day running mean    Sea level
  Tau-x felt along Kelvin wave characteristic    Integral along characteristic    Integral along characteristic at various longitudes

  Time series of SST difference at longitudes along the equator and RMS difference: Exp-289    Exp-317    Exp-317 (60 DRM removed)   

• Figure DDD. Surface current difference due to idealized MJO winds.    ( Exp277)    ( Exp282)    ( Exp285)    ( Exp282 Mar-Aug)    ( Exp285 Mar-Aug)    ( Exp288 Mar-Aug)    ( Exp289 Mar-Aug)    ( Exp289 Mar-Oct)    ( Exp282 Mar-Aug w SST)    ( Exp289 Mar-Aug w SST)    ( Exp317 Mar-Aug)    ( Exp317 Mar-Oct)

• Figure EEE. Wind stress, wind speed and latent heat flux at 0°, 150°E-170°E during model year 4, comparing the climatological (solid line) and MJO (dashed line) runs. Top: Zonal wind stress, Middle: Wind speed (the dotted line shows 4 m/s, the minimum wind speed permitted); Bottom: Latent heat flux (negative for heat loss by the ocean).
  Same figure for other runs:
  Alternate version
  5N/m2 winds (278)
  Sinusoidal stress (not wind) (.04N/m2) (282)
  Gaussian stress (.0545N/m2) (281)
  Gaussian stress (.0682N/m2) (283)
  Sinusoidal stress (.03N/m2) (285)
  Sinusoidal stress (.04N/m2 + clouds) (286)
  Sinusoidal stress (.02N/m2) (288)
  Sinusoidal stress (.03N/m2) (289)
  Sinusoidal stress (.03N/m2) (Reversed windspeed phase) (290)
  Sinusoidal stress (.03N/m2) (90-day period) (291)
  Sinusoidal stress (.03N/m2) (Reverse wind stress phase) (292)
  Sinusoidal stress (.03N/m2) (45-day period) (293)
  Sinusoidal stress (.035N/m2) (317)    (Jan-Aug)
  V strong Gaussian winds

• Figure FFF. SST (°C) anomalies on the equator during coupled model runs. Top: control run hindcast initialized to 1 January 1997. Bottom: Difference between the run with added heat fluxes from the OGCM and the control run. Note different contour intervals in each panel.

• Figure GGG. TAO wind and SST along the equator.

• Mean heat flux terms (mean difference compared to 255 over days 60-240 (Mar-Aug)):
  282 - 4 N/m2 winds
  285 - 3 N/m2 winds
  286 - 4 N/m2 winds and clouds
  288 - 2 N/m2 winds
  289 - 3 N/m2 winds
  290 - 3 N/m2 winds (Reversed windspeed phase)
  316 - 3 N/m2 winds (120-day period)
  291 - 3 N/m2 winds (90-day period)
  292 - 3 N/m2 winds (Reverse wind stress phase)
  293 - 3 N/m2 winds (45-day period)
  294 - 3 N/m2 winds (30-day period)
  281 - Gaussian patch
  317 - 0.035 N/m2 winds    Jan-Aug
  V strong Gaussian winds (321)
  

• Compare vertical advection for different MJO periods:
  Vertical advection time evolution along the equator for control and 4 periods
  Vertical advection as above (line plots averaged over 155°E-170°E)
  Vertical advection difference (from control) as above(line plots averaged over 155°E-170°E)
  Compare dSST/dt and term differences (1°N-1°S, 155°E-170°E):
      Evaporation    Zonal advection    Vertical Advection    Meridional Advection    Vertical Mixing

• Check heat flux terms in a run with cloud oscillations, too (286): SST   Solar and vertical advection terms   Solar and Vertical advection differences   SST and integrated heat fluxes

• Compare winds and SST for adjusted-to-1986-95 winds: 150°E    155°E    160°E    170°E

• Kleeman model results:
  Compare control run and MJO run (gray-shading)    (Color)
  Eastward propagation of zonal winds and SST due to MJO SST forcing
  Compare old and new control runs

• Maps of evolving SST differences:
  Exp282
  Exp289
  Exp289 (x spz9, y spz5)
  Exp289 (120 DRM, x spz15, y spz11)
  Exp292 (x spz9, y spz5)
  Exp292 - 289 (x spz9, y spz5)
  AV(292+289) - 255 (x spz9, y spz5)
  AV(292+289) - 255 (120 DRM, x spz15, y spz11)
  AV(292+289) - 255 (120 DRM, x spz15, y spz11) Along Equator
  Exp317 - 255 (120 DRM, x spz15, y spz11)
  Exp317 - 255 (60 DRM, x spz9, y spz5)

• Runs with incoherent intraseasonal winds (different realizations of the wind forcing):
  Tau-x fields:    On the equator    Along 155°E
  Tau-x statistics:    On the equator    Along 145°E    Along 155°E    Along 165°E
  SST along the equator:    SST fields    60-day average SST fields    SST compare Exp-289
  Mean heat flux terms:    Evaporation    Zonal advection    Vertical advection

• Compare coupled model control vs MJO run (weak MJO forcing in OGCM, Haney relaxation)

• Some OLR figures for the Dec 1992 wind burst:  
  Maps of total OLR
  Maps of anomalous OLR
  Maps of interaseasonal OLR
  Hofmoller of total OLR
  Hofmoller of intraseasonal OLR