{"id":1751,"date":"2022-08-09T15:19:44","date_gmt":"2022-08-09T15:19:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/faculty.washington.edu\/nassimi\/wordpress\/?p=1751"},"modified":"2024-12-13T20:27:13","modified_gmt":"2024-12-13T20:27:13","slug":"dm_studies2022","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/faculty.washington.edu\/nassimi\/course-schedule-syllabi\/dm_studies2022\/","title":{"rendered":"DIGITAL MEDIA STUDIES (LMC 8001): SPRING 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Image Credits: Hayri Dortdivanlioglu<\/small><\/p>\n\n\n\n

PURPOSE<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

To lay a foundation for understanding design and research methods for the systemic study of design, media, and computing technologies. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

OVERVIEW<\/strong> <\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The purpose of this course is to lay a foundation for better understanding of design and research methods and their grounding in philosophy of knowledge. Students will learn how research questions and methods as themselves ‘designed’ in the ways that they are positioned to frame problems, collect and share evidence and claim their validity, and shape arguments in response to theoretical and practical problems. This will faciliate the understanding of theory and practice as deeply intertwined, entangled in social and cultural ideals and values while rejecting a relativistic standpoint that renders all knowledge claims as equally valid. The course will include discussions, guest speakers, viewing, and workshops to examine various methodological strategies and their tactics in action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LEARNING OBJECTIVES<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
    \n
  • Understanding the philosophic foundations of digital media design and research methodologies<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Engaging critically and creatively with design and research methods by tracing their history, unpacking their politics, and critically engaging their epistemic validity<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  • Employing theories presented in this course to identify\/frame problems and choose methodologies that are best suited to address them<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n

    CLASS ETHOS<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

    I strive to create an open and inclusive learning environment built upon feminist ethos of curiosity, generosity, humility, and respect coupled with practices of listening, experimentation, and collaboration. I will explain the details of this on the first day of classes and look forward to your particular ways of following, extending, and amending the above by expressing what they might entail in your words and actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    READINGS<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

    Required<\/strong><\/em>
    Booth, Wayne C., Gregory G. Colomb, and Joseph M. Williams. The Craft of Research<\/em>. 2003. 
    Graff, Gerald, Cathy Birkenstein, and Russel Durst. They say, I say: The Moves That Matters in Academic Writing.<\/em> 2006. Highly Recommended
    <\/strong><\/em>Clark, Roy Peter. Writing Tools: 55 Essential Strategies for Every Writer<\/em>. Little, Brown Spark, 2008.
    Lamott, Anne. Bird by Bird: Some Instructions on Writing and Life.<\/em> Anchor, 1995.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Course Foundations<\/strong><\/em>
    This course is inspired and informed by the following:
    Buchanan, Richard. “Systems Thinking and Design Thinking: The Search for Principles in the World We Are Making.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation<\/em> 5, no. 2 (2019): 85\u2013104. 
    Dewey, John. Logic: the Theory of Inquiry.<\/em> 1938.
    Haraway, Donna. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies<\/em> 14, no. 3 (1988): 575-599. 
    Harding, Sandra G., ed. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies<\/em>. Psychology Press, 2004. 
    hooks, bell. Teaching to Transgress.<\/em> 2014. 
    Lorde, Audre. Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches<\/em>. Crossing Press, 2012. 
    Lury, Celia, and Nina Wakeford, eds. Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social<\/em>. Routledge, 2012.
    Levine, Donald N. Powers of the Mind: The Reinvention of Liberal Learning in America.<\/em> 2006.
    McKeon, Richard P. On Knowing\u2014The Social Sciences<\/em>. 2017. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Listening and Viewing Assignments<\/strong><\/em> 
    In addition to reading, you will be assigned to watch videos or listen to podcasts. These materials an essential part of the course that will be drawn upon in class discussions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Weekly Writing<\/strong><\/em> 
    To engender class discussion, students will write short entries on the readings ahead of each session. Writing assignments are due at 5pm every Wednesday unless otherwise instructed. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    How will this class help me with quals?<\/strong><\/em>
    It is important to note that the aim of this class is *not* to prepare for quals. Rather, the aim is for you to begin your research trajectory by learning about the plurality of epistemic approaches: What are the possible ways to approach your research interest? How can you write a proposal and identify meaningful ways to craft hypotheses and collect evidence? What do these choices imply for the communities of knowledg that you engage with and the kinds of impact you can make? The good news is, however, that leearning to answer the above questions, alongside many excercises and foundations we learn, are applicable to your preparation for quals inclusive of learning how to read, how to think through similarities and differnces ways of knowing and writing, and how to frame and communicate your own response to authors and readings. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Course Schedule<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

    PART I. SCIENTIFIC AND POSITIVIST STRATEGIES<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n
    \n

    Week 1: Jan 9<\/b> <\/h4>\n <\/th>\n <\/tr>\n

     <\/td>\n
    Philosophy of Knowledge and the Demand of Pluralism <\/b><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
     <\/td>\n In Class<\/i><\/td>\n \n
      \n
    • Class Introduction<\/li>\n
    • Is philosophy of knowledge relavant to digital media studies?<\/li>\n
    • How to read?<\/li>\n
    • Concept mapping excersice (based on: Booth, Wayne C. “The rhetorical stance.” College\n Composition and Communication<\/i>14, no. 3 (1963): 139\u2013145.)<\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n
      \n\n \n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n
      \n

      Week 2, Jan 16<\/b> <\/h4>\n <\/th>\n <\/tr>\n

       <\/td>\n
      Scientific Strategies | Objectivity and Efficiency <\/b><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
       <\/td>\n Required<\/i><\/td>\n \n
       <\/td>\n Recommended<\/i><\/td>\n \n
        \n
      • Turing, Alan M. “Computing machinery and intelligence.” In Parsing the Turing Test, pp.\n 23\u201365.\n Springer, Dordrecht, 2009<\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n
        \n\n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n
        \n

        Week 3, Jan 23<\/b> <\/h4>\n <\/th>\n <\/tr>\n

         <\/td>\n
        Scientific Strategies | Objectivity and Efficiency <\/b><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
         <\/td>\n Required<\/i><\/td>\n \n
         <\/td>\n Recommended<\/i><\/td>\n \n
          \n
        • Wiener, Norbert. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society.<\/i> The\n Riverside Press, 1950.<\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n
          \n\n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n
          \n

          Week 4, Jan 30<\/b> <\/h4>\n <\/th>\n <\/tr>\n

           <\/td>\n
          Putting Scientific Strategies in Historical Perspective <\/b><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
           <\/td>\n Required<\/i><\/td>\n \n
            \n
          • Buchanan, Richard. “Design Research and the New Learning.”\u00a0Design Issues<\/em>\u00a017, no. 4\n (2001): 3\u201323.<\/li>\n
          • Huppatz, Daniel J. “Revisiting Herbert Simon’s \u201cScience of Design\u201d.” Design Issues<\/em>\n 31, no. 2 (2015): 29-40. <\/li>\n
          • Nakamura, Lisa. “Indigenous Circuits: Navajo Women and the Racialization of Early Electronic\n Manufacture.”\u00a0American Quarterly<\/em>\u00a066, no. 4 (2014): 919\u2013 941.<\/li>\n
          • Casta\u00f1eda, Claudia, and Lucy Suchman. “Robot visions.” Social Studies of Science 44, no. 3\n (2014): 315\u2013341.&<\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n
            \n\n\n\n\n

            PART II. ETHNOGRAPHIC AND INTERPRETIVE STRATEGIES<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n
            \n

            Week 5, Feb 6<\/b> <\/h4>\n <\/th>\n <\/tr>\n

             <\/td>\n
            Ethnographic, Interpretive, and Speculative Strategies | Power and Politics of\n Knowledge Making<\/b><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
             <\/td>\n Required<\/i><\/td>\n \n
              \n
            • Geertz, Clifford. After the Fact: Two Countries, Four Decades, One\n Anthropologist.<\/i>1996. (Ch. 1)<\/li>\n
            • Chin, Elizabeth. My Life with Things: The Consumer Diaries. <\/i> Duke University Press,\n 2016. (Selections)<\/li>\n
            • Frank, Arthur W. “Can we research suffering?.” Qualitative health research 11, no. 3 (2001):\n 353-362.<\/li>\n\n
            • Wong, Alice. “The Rise and Fall of the Plastic Straw Sucking in Crip\n Defiance.”\u00a0Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience<\/em>\u00a05, no. 1 (2019).<\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
             <\/td>\n Recommended<\/i><\/td>\n \n
              \n
            • Geertz, Clifford. “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight.” In Culture and Politics,\n <\/i>pp. 175\u2013201.<\/li>\n
            • Goffman, Erving.\u00a0The presentation of self in everyday life<\/em>. 1978. (Intro. + Ch. 1)\n <\/li>\n
            • Miller, Daniel. The Comfort of Things. <\/i> 2008.<\/li>\n
            • Duneier, Mitchell, and Ovie Carter.\u00a0Sidewalk<\/em>. 1999.<\/li>\n
            • Turkle, Sherry.\u00a0Life on the Screen<\/em>. 2011.<\/li>\n
            • Du Gay, Paul et al. Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman<\/i>. 2013.\n <\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n
              \n\n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n
              \n

              Week 6, Feb 13<\/b> <\/h4>\n <\/th>\n <\/tr>\n

               <\/td>\n
              Ethnographic, Interpretive, and Speculative Strategies | Power and Politics of\n Knowledge Making<\/b><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
               <\/td>\n Required<\/i><\/td>\n \n
                \n Invited Lecture: Dr. Jennifer Singh\n
              • Singh, Jennifer S. Multiple Autisms: Spectrums of advocacy and genomic science<\/i>. U of\n Minnesota Press, 2015. Intro and Chapters 4 and 5<\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
               <\/td>\n Recommended<\/i><\/td>\n \n
                \n
              • Emerson, Robert, et al. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes.<\/i> 2011.<\/li>\n
              • Clarke, Adele E., and Kathy Charmaz, eds.\u00a0Grounded theory and situational analysis<\/em>.\n 2014.<\/li>\n
              • Olson, Judith S., and Wendy A. Kellogg, eds.\u00a0Ways of Knowing in HCI<\/em>. Vol. 2, 2014.\n <\/li>\n
              • Bowker, Geoffrey C., Karen Baker, Florence Millerand, and David Ribes. “Toward information\n infrastructure studies: Ways of knowing in a networked environment.” In\u00a0International\n handbook of internet research<\/em>, pp. 97-117. 2009.<\/li>\n
              • Seaver, Nick. “Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic\n systems.”\u00a0Big Data & Society<\/em>\u00a04, no. 2 (2017).<\/li>\n
              • Clarke, A., and A. Clarke. “Doing situational maps and analysis.” Situational analysis:\n Grounded theory after the postmodern turn (2005): 83-144.<\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n
                \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n
                \n

                Week 7, Feb 20<\/b> <\/h4>\n <\/th>\n <\/tr>\n

                 <\/td>\n
                Ethnographic and Interpretive Methods<\/b><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
                 <\/td>\n Required<\/i><\/td>\n \n
                  \n
                • Charmaz, Kathy (2013).”Grounded Theory Methods in Social Justice Research.” The Sage\n Handbook of Qualitative Research. <\/i> Chapters 1 and 2. <\/li>\n
                • Clarke, Adele E. “Situational Analyses: Grounded Theory Mapping After the Postmodern Turn.”\n Symbolic Interaction <\/i> 26, no. 4 (2003): 553-576.<\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n
                  \n\n\n\n \n\n

                  PART III. TRANSCENDING THE OBJECTIVE\/SUBJECTIVE BINARY<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n
                  \n

                  Week 8, Feb 27<\/b> <\/h4>\n <\/th>\n <\/tr>\n

                   <\/td>\n
                  Beyond a View from Nowhere: Situated Knowledges and Strong Objectivity<\/b><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
                   <\/td>\n Required<\/i><\/td>\n \n
                   <\/td>\n Recommended<\/i><\/td>\n \n
                    \n
                  • Buchanan, Richard. “Branzi’s Dilemma: Design in Contemporary Culture.” Design Issues\n <\/i> 14, no. 1 (1998): 3\u201320.<\/li>\n
                  • Suchman, Lucy. “Agencies in technology design: Feminist reconfigurations.”\n In\u00a0Proceedings of 5th European Symposium on Gender & ICT, Digital Cultures:\n Participation\u2013Empowerment\u2013Diversity<\/em>. 2009.
                    \n <\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n
                    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n
                    \n

                    Week 9, March 6<\/b> <\/h4>\n <\/th>\n <\/tr>\n

                     <\/td>\n
                    Beyond a View from Nowhere: Wicked Problems, Uncertaintly, and Inquiry<\/b><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
                     <\/td>\n Required<\/i><\/td>\n \n
                      \n
                    • Buchanan, Richard. “Wicked problems in design thinking.” Design Issues <\/i> 8, no. 2\n (1992): 5\u201321.<\/li>\n
                    • Steen, Marc. “Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination.”\u00a0Design\n Issues<\/em>\u00a029, no. 2 (2013): 16\u201328. (first half)<\/li>\n
                    • Forlano, Laura, and Stephanie Smith. "Critique as Collaboration in Design\n Anthropology." Journal of Business Anthropology 7, no. 2 (2018): 279\u2013300.<\/li>\n
                    • ++ Proposal First Draft Due<\/strong><\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
                     <\/td>\n Recommended<\/i><\/td>\n \n
                      \n
                    • Sch\u00f6n, Donald A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. <\/i>\n Routledge, 2017. Chapter 1: Required. Chapters 2 and 3: Recommended<\/i><\/li>\n
                    • JafariNaimi, Nassim, Lisa Nathan, and Ian Hargraves. “Values as hypotheses: design, inquiry,\n and the service of values.” Design Issues <\/i> 31, no. 4 (2015): 91\u2013104.<\/li>\n
                    • Warr, Andy, and Eamonn O’Neill. “Understanding Design as a Social Creative Process.” In\n Proceedings of the 5th conference on Creativity & Cognition <\/i>, pp. 1181\u2013127. ACM, 2005\n <\/li>\n
                    • John Dewey: \u201cThe Pattern of Inquiry,\u201d In Logic, the Theory of Inquiry. (1938)<\/i><\/li>\n\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n
                      \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n
                      \n

                      Week 10, March 13<\/b> <\/h4>\n <\/th>\n <\/tr>\n

                       <\/td>\n
                      Beyond a View from Nowhere: Design-Based Inquiry<\/b><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
                       <\/td>\n Required<\/i><\/td>\n \n
                        \n
                      • Friedman, Ken. “Research into, by and for design.” Journal of Visual Art Practice <\/i>\n 7, no. 2 (2008): 153\u2013160<\/li>\n
                      • Frayling, Christopher (1993). \u201cResearch in art and design.\u201d Royal College of Art, Research\n Papers, Volume 1, Number 1, London<\/li>\n
                      • ++ writing workshop and proposal discussion<\/li>\n\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
                       <\/td>\n Recommended<\/i><\/td>\n \n
                        \n
                      • Dourish, Paul. “Implications for design.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on\n Human Factors in Computing Systems <\/i> , pp. 5411\u2013550. ACM, 2006.<\/li>\n
                      • Matt Ratto. 2011. Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social\n Life. The Information Society <\/i>27, 4: 252\u2013260.<\/li>\n
                      • Janet Vertesi, David Ribes, Laura Forlano, Yanni A. Loukissas, and Marisa Leavitt Cohn.\n 2016. Engaging, Designing, and Making Digital Systems. In The Handbook of Science and\n Technology Studies <\/i>(fourth edition edition), Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouch\u00e9, Clark A.\n Miller and Laurel Smith-Doerr (eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, 169\u2013194. <\/li>\n\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n
                        \n\n \n\n\n

                        Week 11, March 20-24: Spring Break<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n
                        \n

                        Week 12, March 27<\/b> <\/h4>\n <\/th>\n <\/tr>\n

                         <\/td>\n
                        Beyond a View from Nowhere: Decolonizing Methodologies<\/b><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
                         <\/td>\n Required<\/i><\/td>\n \n
                          \n
                        • Bidwell, Nicola, and Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, eds.\u00a0At the intersection of indigenous\n and traditional knowledge and technology design<\/em>. Informing Science, 2015. [Select\n chapters read by students] <\/li>\n
                        • Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. <\/i>\n Zed Books Ltd., 2012. (Intro, Chapters 1 and 6)<\/li>\n
                        • TallBear, Kim. 2014. \u201cStanding with and Speaking as Faith: A Feminist-Indigenous Approach to\n Inquiry.\u201d Journal of Research Practice 10, no. 2: 17.<\/li>\n
                        • ++ Writing workshop and proposal discussion<\/strong><\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n
                          \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n
                          \n

                          Week 13, April 3<\/b> <\/h4>\n <\/th>\n <\/tr>\n

                           <\/td>\n
                          Beyond a View from Nowhere: Inventive and Participatory Methods<\/b><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
                           <\/td>\n Required<\/i><\/td>\n \n
                            \n
                          • Simonsen, Jesper, and Toni Robertson, eds. Routledge international handbook of\n participatory design. <\/i> Routledge, 2012. [chapters selected by students] <\/li>\n
                          • Keyes, Os, Jevan Hutson, and Meredith Durbin. “A Mulching Proposal.”\u00a0arXiv preprint\n arXiv:1908.06166<\/em>\u00a0(2019).<\/li>\n
                          • Gupta, Hemangini. “Postcolonial Assembly Protocols for Unnamed Automation\n Projects.”\u00a0Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience<\/em>\u00a06, no. 2 (2020).<\/li>\n
                          • ++ Writing workshop and proposal discussion <\/strong><\/li>\n\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
                           <\/td>\n Recommended<\/i><\/td>\n \n
                            \n
                          • Keshavarz, Mahmoud. “Material Practices of power\u2013part I&II: Passports and Passporting.” \n Design Philosophy Papers <\/i> 13, no. 2 (2015): 97\u2013113.<\/li>\n
                          • Khosravi, Shahram. ‘Illegal’ Traveller: an Auto-Ethnography of Borders<\/i>. 2010.<\/li>\n
                          • Forlano, Laura. “Data Rituals in Intimate Infrastructures: Crip Time and the Disabled Cyborg\n Body as an Epistemic site of Feminist Science.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory,\n Technoscience<\/i> 3, no. 2 (2017).<\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n
                            \n\n\n\n \n

                            FROM METHODS TO PRINCIPLES<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n \n
                            \n

                            Week 14, April 10<\/b> <\/h4>\n <\/th>\n <\/tr>\n

                             <\/td>\n
                            Staying with the Trouble<\/b><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
                             <\/td>\n Required<\/i><\/td>\n \n
                              \n
                            • Haraway, Donna J.\u00a0Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene<\/em>. Duke\n University Press, 2016.<\/li>\n
                            • Sara, Ahmed. “Living a Feminist Life.” (2017).<\/li>\n
                            • Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, \u201cThe dangers of a single story\u201d (TED Talk) <\/li>\n
                            • Hargraves, Ian. “Care and Capacities of Human-Centered Design.” Design Issues <\/i> 34,\n no. 3 (2018): 76\u201388.<\/li>\n
                            • ++ Writing workshop and proposal discussion <\/strong><\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
                             <\/td>\n Recommended<\/i><\/td>\n \n
                              \n
                            • Vallor, Shannon. Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth\n wanting<\/em>. 2016
                              \n <\/li>\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n
                              \n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n \n \n \n \n
                              \n

                              Week 15, April 17<\/b> <\/h4>\n <\/th>\n <\/tr>\n

                               <\/td>\n
                              Dialectical and Conversational Methods<\/b><\/td>\n <\/tr>\n
                               <\/td>\n Required<\/i><\/td>\n \n
                                \n\n
                              • ++ Writing workshop and proposal discussion <\/strong><\/li>\n\n <\/ul>\n <\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n
                                \n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

                                The purpose of this course is to lay a foundation for better understanding of design and research methods and their grounding in philosophy of knowledge.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1611,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/faculty.washington.edu\/nassimi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1751"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/faculty.washington.edu\/nassimi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/faculty.washington.edu\/nassimi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faculty.washington.edu\/nassimi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faculty.washington.edu\/nassimi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1751"}],"version-history":[{"count":79,"href":"https:\/\/faculty.washington.edu\/nassimi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1751\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2440,"href":"https:\/\/faculty.washington.edu\/nassimi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1751\/revisions\/2440"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faculty.washington.edu\/nassimi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1611"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/faculty.washington.edu\/nassimi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1751"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faculty.washington.edu\/nassimi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1751"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/faculty.washington.edu\/nassimi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1751"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}