[HOME] [NEXT]


POLS 410   LECTURE 14
"THE POLITICS OF AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY"

  I.  The Current Situation
       *FOOD:  1 billion chronically undernourished 41,000 people, mostly
 	  children, die of starvation daily
	Avg. daily food consumption in LDC's = abt. 1/2 U.S.
	Inequity & waste:  can of diet soda:
	2,400 cals of energy to produce for 1 cal of nutrition (= to 7,000
 	  cals food)
	*POP:  over 5 billion
 	It took all of history until 1830 to reach 1 billion.
 	Pop. growth rate = 2.7%; affluent countries @ 1%
   	Parts of Africa over 3%
	Thomas Malthus:  exponential pop growth will overwhelm the land
 	  >> starvation & pop. decline.
  	--didn't take account of technological innovations, 
	e.g., mechanized farming, chemical fertilizer, etc.
	Technological improvements in agriculture unlikely to keep up with
 	  pop. growth.
	Availability:  production vs. distribution
  	Ppl in affluent countries consume twice the minimum protein required
 	  & ppl in LDC's often get 1/2.
      1.  Affluent get protein from animals; poor get their's from plant
 	  sources (incomplete)

 II.  Production and Markets
     A.  Until 1970's, domestic agricultural policies were not considered
         relevant to IR.
	1.  Trade limited in quantity & mostly to delicacies.
     B.  Prior to world market, ppl were at the mercy of domestic production. 
    	1.  Pops. were trimmed by starvation & malnutrition
	2.  Hundreds, thousands of major famines in history.
     C.  Major commodities
     	1.  Wheat = dietary staple in temperate regions; 
	    = most impt. commodity intl. agricultural trade.
	    U.S. accounts for 40% of all exports.
     	2.  Rice = staple for 1/2 of world's pop. living in tropics; 
    	    China & India produce over 1/2 world's rice;
    	    U.S. is not the major producer, but is #1 exporter.
	3.  Corn:  primarily used for feed, eaten in Latin Am. US produces 1/2
 	    world's corn.
     D.  U.S. dominates intl agric. trade (hegemon)
	 20% of all U.S. export earnings come from agric.
	 1980's:  Soviet Union & China absorbed 1/4 US exports.
	 Heavy farm subsidies to keep prices higher; farmers paid to hold
 	   land out of production.
	 Some surplus disposed thru 1954 Food for Peace program, wh. provides
 	   food to pol'ly acceptable countries.
     E.  Dramatic shifts in 1970's
    	1.  Combinatn of bad harvests, rising energy prices, & increased demand
 	    >> drastic decline in world carry-over stocks
    	2.  Entry of Soviet Union into world market
   	    a.  Expansion of agric. in 1960's was mostly in Siberia, whose
 		marginal land produced widely fluctuating harvests.
   	    b.  US became major supplier until
	        Carter imposed grain embargo after Afghanistan invasion.
    	3.  OPEC countries all inc'd food imports w/ higher oil prices.
     E.  Positive aspects of world food market
    	1.  Frees countries from needing food self-suffiency, making labor
 	    available for industrial production.
    	2.  Permits food exporters like US to use their resources fully.
     	3.  Countries w/ shortages due to bad weather can turn to the world
 	    market for relief.
     F.  Negative aspects
    	1.  Seduces LDC leaders away from agric. self-sufficiency, posing
 	      serious probs. should reasonably priced food become available
 	      down the road.
     	2.  Scarce hard currency is needed to buy imports.
    	3.  Greater chance of global famine triggered by simultaneous crop
 	      failures.
    	4.  LDC's at greatest risk:  weather-related shortages
   cd. lead to higher food prices & nationalistic food policies by exporters.

 III.  Food-energy connection
     A.  Throughout most of history, food production took place mostly w/i
         constraints of solar energy.
     B.  Agric. has undergone its own industrial revolution:
	   Fossil fuel-based fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, machinery
 	     all boost production.
     C.  World food market subject to boom & bust cycles very similar to those
 	   in the oil industry (follows them)
	1960's:  superabundance of food
	Green Revolution begun, went thr 70's:
	new, more prolific crop strains & fertilizers
	Yes, more production, but more vulnerable & less sustainable.
	1970's:  major famines (Bangledesh) &
	oil shocks >>
	>> "world food crisis"
	1974 UN World Food Conference established World Food Council & Intl
 	  Fundfor Agricultural Devt., wh. is heavily supported by OPEC.
	1980's:  oil glut & another pd. of world food surplus.
     D.  Major difference bet food & energy markets:
    	Oil mkt is quasi-monopolistic; food is relatively free.
     E.  Food mkt is sort of mirror image of oil mkt
	1.  Exporters of food are importers of oil & vice versa.
	2.  2 Ironies
    	    a.  Affluent countries use the products of their energy-intensive
 		agricultural tech. to gain export revenue w/ which to pay for
 		the imported oil that is essential to their farming.
    	    b.  Recent gains in food production have taken place in the
 		affluent countries, where pop. growth has plateaued   
	    >>  main prob. is distribution, not supply.

 III.  FAO
     A.  What is it?  
 	Largest of specialized UN agencies
     B.  What's wrong with it?
	1.  Approach to dev't
	    a.  Promotes export-led growth in agric.
	        >> vulnerability bec. of unstable commodity mkts
	        -- undermines local self-sufficiency
	        -- harms peasants & small farmers
	    b.  High-tech, capital-intensive
		>> contracts go to companies in North
		>> research mostly done in North
		>> rural unemploymt & migratn to urban areas
		-- overly promotes pesticide use
	2.  Bureaucratic probs.
	   a.  Efficiency judged by how fast money is spent
		>> little time to consider appropriate tech. or involve
 		   sociologists & anthropologists, much less local
 		   communities
	   b.  Defines itself as an inter-governmental org.
		>> no arena for NGO participation,
   		esp. intl. peasants union
	   c.  Captured by agri-business, esp. chemical companies
	   d.  Inefficiency
		e.g., system of special FAO ambassadors duplicates UN
 		functions, costs $22 million/year.
  	3.  Director-General Edouard Saouma
	   a.  Autocratic, paranoid management style

 IV.  Green Revolution
      FAO-led, 1960's-70's, focused in India

  V.  The Global Livestock Economy
      Biologist:  "An alien ecologist observing earth might conclude that
 	cattle are the dominant animal species in our biosphere"
      Domesticated animals now outnumber humans 3 to 1; 
      mostly for meat (for the affluent, esp. US).
      What's wrong w/ heavy meat consumption?
	A.  Grain consumption
	   1.  To raise meat output, new intensive rearing technologies were
 	       adopted relying on grains & legumes to feed animals.  Virtually
  	       all pigs & poultry in industrial countries are raised in
 	       gigantic indoor feeding facilities.
	   2.  In US, animals account for 70% of domestic grain consumption
 		(compare to 2% for India & sub-Saharan Africa)
	B.  Very energy & water intensive
	   1.  30,000 kcals. fossil fuel energy burned to produce a kg. of
 	       pork in US (approx. 4 liters gasoline).
	   2.  The water used to supply a typical American w/ meat,  milk &
 	       eggs each day matches that person's daily water use at home,
 	       about 380 liters.
	C.  Envt'lly disastrous
	   1.  Huge quantities of waste, much of which ends up in rivers, bays
 	       & groundwater.  
		a.  In Netherlands, ammonia from livestock is the single
 		    largest source of acid deposition/rain.
	   2.  Tropical deforestation, esp. in Latin America, Amazon
		a.  Trop. deforestatn = primary cause of loss of biodiversity
	3.  Desertification from overgrazing.
	4.  Lack of plant cover >> soil salinization.
	5.  Methane:  80 million tons from belches & flatulence (burps & farts)
	6.  Price of meat might triple if full envt'l costs were incorporated.