|
Gina-Anne Levow
|
|
|
PhD Thesis, MIT August 25, 1998 Characterizing and Recognizing Spoken Corrections in Human-Computer Dialog Miscommunication in human-computer spoken language systems is unavoidable. Recognition failures on the part of the system necessitate frequent correction attempts by the user. Unfortunately and counterintuitively, users' attempts to speak more clearly in the face of recognition errors actually lead to decreased recognition accuracy. The difficulty of correcting these errors, in turn, leads to user frustration and poor assessments of system quality. Most current approaches to identifying corrections rely on detecting violations of task or belief models that are ineffective where such constraints are weak and recognition results inaccurate or unavailable. In contrast, the approach pursue d in this thesis, in contrast, uses the acoustic contrasts between original inputs and repeat corrections to identify corrections in a more content- and context-independent fashion. This thesis quantifies and builds upon the observation that suprasegmental features, such as duration, pause, and pitch, play a crucial role in distinguishing corrections from other forms of input to spoken language systems. These features can also be used to identify spoken corrections and explain reductions in recognition accuracy for these utterances. By providing a detailed characterization of acoustic-prosodic changes in corrections relative to original inputs in a voice-only system, this thesis contributes to natural language processing and spoken language understanding. We present a treatment of systematic acoustic variability in speech recognizer input as a source of new information, to interpret the speaker's corrective intent, rather than simply as noise or user error. We demonstrate the application of a machine -learning technique, decision trees, for identifying spoken corrections and achieve accuracy rates close to human levels of performance for corrections of misrecognition errors, using acoustic-prosodic information. This process is simple and local and depends neither on perfect transcription o f the recognition string nor complex reasoning based on the full conversation. We further extend the conventional analysis of speaking styles beyond a `read' versus `conversational' contrast to extreme clear speech, describing divergence from phonological and durational models for words in this style. (PDF 10MB) |