Instructor
K. Gillis-Bridges
|
|
Office Hours
MW, 11:30-12:30
and by appt.
|
|
Phone/Voice
Mail
(206) 543-4892
|
|
|
Similar Conflicts, Different
Models: In Birth
of a Nation and Double Indemnity
The films The Birth of a Nation
and Double Indemnity only
seem to treat femininity in very different ways. In Birth of a Nation women were
depicted as weak flighty girls that needed to be taken care of, while
in Double Indemnity women, in
the example of Phyllis, were cunning and strong-willed. The use
of narration as well as cinematic codes such as lighting and color,
impart the notion that women need men to be in control. This
traditional role of femininity is upheld in Birth of a Nation, while in Double Indemnity it is purposely
challenged because of the changing ideologies due to the Second World
War. Although women are depicted so differently in the two films,
the message concerning male fear of women gaining too much power is
actually very similar.
Before comparing the roles each woman plays in her respective films,
one must first look at the context in which each of these films were
made. Birth of a Nation
was filmed in 1915 during a time in which America was just beginning to
become a world power. Women, even mild-mannered housewives,
became suffragettes. While these women weren’t trying to leave
behind their traditional roles of a domestic wife and mother, they were
attempting to let it be known that they deserved a voice. Even
this push for a small voice threatened male sovereignty. Rogin
speaks of this “New Woman” in his commentary on Birth of a Nation. He remarks
that women “represented the modern city” and they were “imagined as
monstrous and chameleon-like” even when described in the avenue of
reproduction and fertility (Rogin 9). We can see a reaction to
the power of the “New Woman” in the way that racial tensions concerning
black men and white women are addressed in Birth of a Nation. Many of
the interactions between black men and white women in Birth, concentrate on control over
women’s sexuality and their reproduction. The Little Pet Sister
would rather jump off a cliff and die than be raped by Gus. It
took the entire KKK to save Elsie from a forced marriage to
Lynch. Images of the struggle for power over reproduction through
the white woman shows what an important role woman had at this
time. The fight over women’s fertility put white females on a
pedestal and in a place of prestige but only gave them limited
power. They did not really have any say over whether a white or
black man controlled them. While white women were obviously
important to the culture, they were only beginning to struggle for more
personal power by fighting for women’s suffrage and getting involved in
social causes. These new endeavors and the search for power
within them was what threatened the “traditional patriarchal forms”
(Rogin 9) of American culture in 1915, and what prompted Griffith to
idealize the traditional model of femininity.
Double Indemnity was
filmed in the 1940s in the midst of WWII. The status quo was
being challenged, in the sense that women began working in
traditionally male factory jobs, while the men were overseas fighting
in the war. As pointed out in “Film Noir: Somewhere in the Night”
with more and more women working outside the home in masculine jobs
many men felt threatened by women’s new found independence.
Traditionalist feared that the family and marriage would fall by the
wayside and time-honored American values would follow. The femme
fatale, in the form of Mrs. Dietrichson, was meant to be an example to
all of what would happen if women gained too much power and
independence when they left the home to work (Belton 91-93). The
women of Birth of a Nation
would never have had a job. Their main purpose was to be married
and reproduce, and we see that in the emphasis put on the marriages
that happen at the end of the movie. All is right when the two
couples are wed and the women, along with the African Americans, are
put in their traditional roles of subservience. Even though
Phyllis is only a housewife when she meets Walter, it’s important to
remember that she did once work as a nurse. This brings up the
question: Can women who have worked outside the home ever really return
to their roles as wives and mothers, or will they be corrupted?
This was a question on the minds of many Americans during the filming
of Double Indemnity as well
as other Film Noir productions. The ending of Double Indemnity answers the
question in a drastically harsh manner. The only way that Phyllis
can be controlled is if Walter kills her. She has proven to be
too deceitful and coldhearted. Her expression of love for Walter
at the very end as he is pointing a gun at her is a little too
convenient, especially considering her previous actions. The lesson
supposedly learned from this film is that women who have too much power
must be eliminated in order to control them. On the other hand
women who do not overtly try to take power, like Elsie, are allowed to
be married, even though this is really just another form of
control.
The different ways that women are portrayed in the two films,
demonstrates the level of control needed to contain each woman. Birth of Nation depicts women such
as Elsie Stoneman as generally flighty, weak, driven by emotion, and
incapable of taking care of themselves. In contrast Phyllis
Dietrichson from Double Indemnity
is a calculating coldhearted woman who knows how to use men to get what
she wants. She doesn’t need men or love to survive or make her
happy. There is one important similarity between Elsie and
Phyllis. Both women do have opinions of their own. Even
though Elsie was, in general, very flighty she did have a political
opinion as seen in her disagreement with the Little Colonel’s
involvement with the Klan. Perhaps it is because she has these
opinions that Elsie’s marriage, and subsequent containment, is such an
important element in the plot throughout the movie. Unlike Phyllis,
Elsie seems to always be under some sort of male control. When
her father, Mr. Stoneman, leaves and there is no apparent male
protector, Lynch sees that he is free to make a move on Elsie since she
couldn’t possibly say no to him with no one there to tell her what to
do. He tries to force her into marriage with him and the
only way Elsie could possibly be saved is for the “valiant” men of the
Klan to sweep her away from danger. In contrast, Phyllis cleverly
scams Walter Neff the second he walks into her home. She flirts
with him, using her beauty to lure him into her web of lies and
murder. She convinces Walter to actually kill her husband without
ever directly asking him. It takes masterful cunning to get her
way but, as a classic femme fatale, Phyllis is an expert. Double Indemnity uses an ultra
powerful woman as a warning to society about women’s growing
influence. In Birth of a Nation,
the audience is constantly reminded that women need male control in
order to survive. This is done as a result of the increasing fear
of “the New Woman” and her growing power. Griffith uses fragile female
characters to try and idealize and uphold the traditional concept of
women while Film Noir uses the femme fatale as a warning to
society.
The narrative and dialogue in both Birth of a Nation and Double Indemnity unlock a key
element concerning the conflict in power between male and female
characters. In Birth, a
key title page read, “Against the wishes of her brother, The Little Pet
Sister went to the well by herself.” This quote not only
foreshadows danger for the Little Sister, it also shows how much
control the Little Colonel had over her. In turn, it demonstrates
what Griffith hopes to impart as the proper power model between a man
and a woman. It implies that if the Little Sister would only
listen to her male protector she would remain safe. The fact that
the Little Sister does end up in trouble, and actually dies, is
supposed to demonstrate how much women really needed men in their lives
to control them. A very different conversation between Walter and
Phyllis carries the same message but delivers it in a completely
different package. The dialogue between Phyllis and Mr. Neff when
they first meet shows Phyllis manipulating Walter, using her sex appeal
and conniving scheme to trick him. She uses a flirty sexy voice
when she asks, “Is there anything I can do?” The verbal repartee
between them, when Phyllis coyly reminds Neff that there is a speed
limit and he is going about 55 mph over it, shows how she controls the
conversation by alternately accepting and rebuffing his advances.
She also uses flattery to distract Neff while she expertly mentions
accident insurance. The fact that Phyllis has so much power over
Walter without ever letting him know it is what makes Mrs. Dietrichson
so dangerous. The control she has over Walter, defies social
norms and it is precisely this influence that traditionalists in post
war America were so afraid of. Instead of using the women in the movie
as an example for other women, like Birth
of a Nation, Double Indemnity
reacts by using the femme fatale as an example of what might happen to
society if women get too much control.
Another way this message is manifested is through the
cinematic codes in film. Both movies use similar lighting and
visual effects concerning the female characters. Elsie Stoneman
is overtly white, with her light hair and clothes as well as an
exaggerated amount of actual light that always seems to encircle her
face. Mrs. Dietrchson’s character wears a platinum wig and
noticeably puts on a white dress when she comes down to talk with Mr.
Neff after their official meeting. It’s no mistake that Phyllis
chose that white dress. She uses this façade of purity to
try and fool Walter into believing that she is just a harmless
housewife with a cruel and domineering husband. All of this light
or white imagery is meant to impart purity and innocence. In Birth of a Nation the women really
are pure and this imagery just solidifies their character roles.
In Double Indemnity however
it is interesting to note that Phyllis wears a dark coat and hat the
night she drives her husband to the train, the same night that she
helps Walter carry out the plan to kill him. She wears noticeably
darker clothing during the end of the movie when her real colors
show. Phyllis tries to hide behind the mask of a traditional
woman using color and cunning words, but her costume can only hide so
much.
The women in these two films are really described in contrast to their
male counterparts. Elsie and the Little Pet are offset by very
strong male characters such as the Little Colonel, Lynch, Gus, as well
as the whole KKK. Phyllis Dietrichson totally controls Mr. Neff
while making seem as if everything was his idea from the
beginning. It is important not only to look at the women in these
two films but also the men involved with them. Lynch is voted to
a position of power even though he is a man of color. He takes
control of the city and has more power than some white men in the
town. By the end of the movie the Little Colonel is strong,
resourceful, and intelligent. He becomes part of a gang of
“protectors of the South” and he is in charge of keeping his family
together. It is interesting to note however, that the Little
Colonel does not start out as a terribly powerful man. Alone, he
couldn’t save his little sister from Gus and he couldn’t do anything
about all the “colored men” in charge of the town and
legislature. It takes his involvement with the Klan to elevate
him to a position of power. It is the Klan as a group that
avenges his younger sister’s death, and the Klan who puts the town to
rights by crushing the power of the black men and putting them in their
“proper” place. Without the Klan behind him, the Little
Colonel doesn’t really have any power. This fact speaks about the
vulnerability that men felt during the time of Reconstruction in the
South, but also in 1915 when the film was made. This
feeling of vulnerability is also seen in Double Indemnity in Mr. Neff’s
character. Walter is the classic bachelor with no women to take
care of him besides a “colored maid” as Phyllis finds out in their
first meeting. He acts as if he has everything under control and
as if he is the brains of the operation while in reality it is Phyllis
who tricked him into getting involved in the first place. It is
in Phyllis’ ultimate control, and the fatal consequences that take
place, that the fear of women’s power can be identified in this
film.
The changing ideals in the United States from the early 1900s
to post war America can be seen in the roles of women and the different
constructions of femininity in film. Women in 1915 were fighting
for the vote and women of the 1940s were gaining independence by
working outside the home. In both time periods, men worried that
their statues was being threatened by a more liberated woman. Double Indemnity and Birth of a Nation use a different
construction of women to impart a similar message. The Birth of a Nation idealizes the
traditional role of the subservient, weak minded woman, hoping to lead
with an example of how proper women should act. Double Indemnity challenges this
idea and instead introduces the femme fatal who is really an embodiment
of a 1940s traditionalist’s greatest fear, an independent woman who
cares nothing for marriage or family. Despite the different
models of women, both films deal with growing social discontent
concerning gender roles and traditional American ideals.
|