===============================  CFJ 3943  ===============================

      grok is a player.

==========================================================================

Caller:                        grok

Judge:                         ais523
Judgement:                     FALSE

==========================================================================

History:

Called by grok:                                   28 Jan 2022 17:31:15
Assigned to ais523:                               31 Jan 2022 21:21:00
Judged FALSE by ais523:                           31 Jan 2022 23:11:00

==========================================================================

Caller's Arguments:

ratifying a public document is a reserved action that
can only be done by players. grok was automatically deregistered by
inactivity and never revoked eir consent from agora. because grok's
consent has been given and has not been revoked, and e attempted to
take a game action, e must be registered at the time e attempted this
action. therefore, grok registered at 17:05 utc on friday, january 28.

Caller's Evidence:

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 11:19 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On 1/28/2022 9:09 AM, grok via agora-business wrote:
> > I amend this action to read:
> >
> > RWO: grok was always a player
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022, 11:05 AM grok via agora-business <
> > agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> >> grok was always a player
> >>
>
> I object.  fun question but it would be a real tangle in the records?
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Judge ais523's Arguments:

Although you need to be a player to ratify something without objection,
you don't need to be a person to table an intent to ratify something
without objection (as far as I can tell, it's possible to intend to
perform a player-only action, then register and perform it). As such,
the message is ambiguous about the time at which grok intends to become
a player, so it fails the "at that time" requirement in rule 869.

As such, I judge CFJ 3943 FALSE.

==========================================================================