Index ← 3879 CFJ 3880 3881 → text
===============================  CFJ 3880  ===============================

      This is a CFJ.


Caller:                        Trigon

Judge:                         ATMunn
Judgement:                     TRUE



Called by Trigon:                                 25 Aug 2020 20:29:58
Assigned to ATMunn:                               30 Aug 2020 18:41:29
Judged TRUE by ATMunn:                            07 Sep 2020 00:47:07


Alleged calling message:

Arbitor's Note:

If a judge finds that eir assigned CFJ is not a CFJ, common practice is to
leave it in the archives with its initial ID number (along with the not-
judgement) and not reassign the ID#, so it can be used as a handy reference
for any follow-up CFJs that might be called on the matter.


Judge ATMunn's Arguments:

The only relevant piece of the rules here is the first paragraph of Rule

       Any person (the initiator) can initiate a Call for Judgement (CFJ,
       syn. Judicial Case), specifying a statement to be inquired into by

It seems reasonable to interpret the statement of "This is a CFJ" as
meaning "I initiate a CFJ with the statement 'This is a CFJ'". We allow
the format "CFJ: blah", and this is not that far off from that.

I judge CFJ 3880 TRUE.