=============================== CFJ 3815 ===============================
Today, I submitted a proposal entitled 'Judicial Jocularity Act'.
==========================================================================
Caller: twg
Judge: Cuddle Beam
Judgement: TRUE
==========================================================================
History:
Called by twg: 14 Feb 2020 18:41:58
Assigned to Cuddle Beam: 19 Feb 2020 15:22:49
Judged TRUE by Cuddle Beam: 19 Feb 2020 21:40:47
==========================================================================
Caller's Evidence:
I wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Title: π₯ππΉπΎπΈπΎπΆπ π₯ππΈπππΆππΎππ ππΈπ
> Adoption index: 1.7
> Chamber: Justice
> Author: twg
> Co-authors:
>
> Amend Rule 591, "Delivering Judgement", by replacing each occurrence of
> "DISMISS" with "Β―\(γ)/Β―".
>
> [Very few CFJs get judged DISMISS at the moment; I figure the generation
> of mirth outweighs the slight inconvenience of having to copy-and-paste
> it from the ruleset occasionally.]
Caller's Arguments:
I don't think "title" is ever explicitly defined in the rules. Is the
exact sequence of Unicode characters important? Or is it just the
English-language words made up of those characters? If I included
invisible Unicode characters in a proposal title, so that it looked like
plain ASCII but wasn't, would the answer be any different?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Cuddle Beam's Arguments:
The title in question is "π₯ππΉπΎπΈπΎπΆπ π₯ππΈπππΆππΎππ ππΈπ".
We've had other languages and special symbols interpreted before (CFJ
3536, 3544) provided that it is understandable. CFJ 3530 provides a limit
to how obscure the symbols and language used can be before it is no longer
reasonably understandable and dismissed for purposes of play.
I don't find this overly obscure, because it's fairly easily readable.
This is normal English, but in a cool font. It says "Judicial Jocularity
Act".
"Judicial Jocularity Act" and "π₯ππΉπΎπΈπΎπΆπ π₯ππΈπππΆππΎππ ππΈπ" are the same
thing but written in different fonts, and the font used is not relevant
for differences between titles (as long as it is reasonably
understandable).
I judge TRUE
==========================================================================