============================== CFJ 3178 ==============================
An Agoran Decision on proposal 7174 was initiated and Murphy was an
eligible voter on it.
Called by FKA441344: 24 Feb 2012 22:15:45 GMT
Assigned to Murphy: 09 Mar 2012 03:00:42 GMT
Judged FALSE by Murphy: 09 Mar 2012 03:33:25 GMT
An Agoran decision is initiated when a person authorized to
initiate it publishes a valid notice which sets forth the intent
to initiate the decision. This notice is invalid if it lacks
any of the following information, and the lack is correctly
identified within one week after the notice is published:
(a) The matter to be decided (for example, "the adoption of
(b) A description of the class of eligible voters sufficient to
enable public agreement on which persons are eligible. In
particular, an explicit list of the eligible voters is
always sufficient for this purpose.
Judge's arguments in CFJ 1722:
So root's notice specified the electorate explicitly but incorrectly.
I find that this constitutes lack of required information within the
meaning of R107.
omd's notice of intent to initiate an Agoran Decision on proposal 7174:
I hereby distribute the following proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it. For this decision, I am the only
Judge Murphy's Arguments:
Per CFJ 3171, the scam deactivations were ineffective, so the
notice (as in CFJ 1722) specified the electorate explicitly but
incorrectly. The problem was publically identified within
the one-week deadline; in particular, omd initiated CFJ 3171
earlier in the same message as the notice, and I voted (noting
that I thought the scam was ineffective) within the first week
after the notice.