Index ← 2945 CFJ 2946 2947 → text
==============================  CFJ 2946  ==============================

    The Agoran decision on Proposal 6939 has been resolved.


Caller:                                 Murphy
Barred:                                 omd

Judge:                                  ais523
Judgement:                              FALSE



Called by Murphy:                       22 Dec 2010 06:58:31 GMT
Assigned to ais523:                     10 Jan 2011 01:03:35 GMT
Judged FALSE by ais523:                 16 Jan 2011 14:52:11 GMT


Caller's Arguments:

>> I intend, With Notice, to cause Rule 2324 to amend itself by appending
>> the following paragraphs:
>>         The set of available options on the decision to adopt Proposal
>>         6939 is { ADOPTED }.
>>         The Assessor SHALL resolve that decision before the time this
>>         text is added to a rule.
> With notice, I do so.
> On the decision to adopt Proposal 6939, I vote ADOPTED.
> That SHALL was to allow me to deputise, but I was mistaken in thinking
> there was a need for that, and in any case it doesn't work properly
> because I forgot not only to intend to deputise, but also to add a
> requirement to end the voting period (allowed by R107 since there is
> only one option but with no deadline).  Sorry, Murphy.

On 6939, I specify that PRESENT counts as a valid option (see Rule
693), vote PRESENT, and resolve it as follows:
  * omd voted ADOPTED
  * Murphy voted PRESENT
  * As permitted by Rule 955 (c), I choose PRESENT as the outcome

(Who says you have a monopoly on abusing language?)


Judge ais523's Arguments:

Regardless of
whether you can specify PRESENT to be a valid option like that or not,
the purported resolution was incorrect; for if both PRESENT and ADOPTED
were valid options, the decision would have failed quorum. Thus, there's
no circumstance under which PRESENT was the actual outcome.