============================== CFJ 2880 ==============================
ehird can make emself the holder of IADoP by announcement
Called by ehird: 07 Oct 2010 13:35:52 GMT
Assigned to G.: 17 Oct 2010 20:42:28 GMT
Judged TRUE by G.: 18 Oct 2010 04:26:08 GMT
Arguments/evidence coming soon;
specifically, just copy-and-paste the ones on ais523's case here.
Judge G.'s Arguments:
When a conditional is paradoxical, it does not, in fact, have a truth
value. The conditional itself is undecidable, that is a fact.
However, that doesn't mean that that truth value cascades to other
dependencies on the truth value.
You can say that the condition is NOT met, and NOT not met, where the
capitalized NOT is evaluated one level up (e.g. a meta-evaluation) so
that "NOT not" does not cancel out into "met". This is consistent
with many philosophies of "resolving" self-paradox, as being neither true
nor false, and in retrospect I'm very surprised it has never been used
as an argument here. After all, there is nothing in the rules that
forbids using a meta-evaluation on a conditional of this nature, or
using the NOT met in the particular rule as a meta-evaluation and
it certainly falls within both common sense and the spirit of the game.
Since the condition is NOT met (and it doesn't matter if it's also
NOT not met) the dependent action fails. ehird remained active and
CAN (or COULD) become IADoP by announcement. TRUE.