============================ Appeal 2805a ============================
Appeal initiated: 15 Jun 2010 17:20:30 GMT
Assigned to G. (panelist): 20 Jun 2010 15:55:05 GMT
Assigned to Wooble (panelist): 20 Jun 2010 15:55:05 GMT
Assigned to Murphy (panelist): 20 Jun 2010 15:55:05 GMT
Murphy moves to REMAND: 27 Jun 2010 21:34:45 GMT
Wooble moves to REMAND: 28 Jun 2010 12:34:25 GMT
G. moves to REMAND: 28 Jun 2010 19:02:40 GMT
Final decision (REMAND): 28 Jun 2010 19:02:40 GMT
Panelist Murphy's Arguments:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> CFJ 2805a entered its four-day overtime period about two hours
>> ago. See Rule 911 for details; H. Justiciar Yally, take note.
>> I opine REMAND, requesting that H. Judge coppro explicitly address the
>> pros/cons of accepting or rejecting implicit delimiters in light of
> You need to specify with or without prejudice.
I opine REMAND without prejudice.
Panelist Wooble's Arguments:
I concur with Murphy's instructions and opine remand without prejudice.
Panelist G.'s Arguments:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I concur with Murphy's instructions and opine remand without prejudice.
As do I. -G.