============================== CFJ 2773 ==============================
Wooble is a player.
Called by Yally: 01 Mar 2010 19:34:55 GMT
Assigned to Murphy: 06 Mar 2010 16:42:41 GMT
Judged FALSE by Murphy: 06 Mar 2010 16:44:26 GMT
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:43, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I indicate reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously that e
> intends to become a player at that time.
Was it intentional that this is EXACTLY 30 days (to the minute) from the
time you deregistered? I CFJ, II=2 on the following sentence. Wooble is a
player. I ask that the judge consider not only eir odd sentence structure of
registration, but the timing of events. Additionally, e should strive to
establish some sort of timing precedent.
Gratuitous Arguments by Murphy:
Wooble's use of "e intends" rather than "I intend" may constitute
sufficient ambiguity to make this FALSE, regardless of timing.
I recommend that the judge certify the typical practice of
interpreting Rule 478's last paragraph as "the time in the Date:
header, except when other headers indicate that that time is
significantly incorrect", and that no such exception exists in
Gratuitous Evidence by Murphy:
Here are the date-stamped headers from my receipt of Wooble's
deregistration, abbreviated for readability, all times on left in UTC:
18:44:05 Received: from hrndva-mxlb.mail.rr.com
18:44:05 Received: from 126.96.36.199 by hrndva-iedge02.mail.rr.com
18:44:02 Received: from yzma.clarkk.net by yzma.clarkk.net
18:43:39 Received: from mail-ew0-f220.google.com by yzma.clarkk.net
18:43:37 Received: by ewy20
18:43:37 Received: by 10.216.87.134
18:43:17 Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:43:17 -0500
and from my receipt of eir alleged re-registration (* = later,
x = earlier, ! = same):
*18:44:09 Received: from hrndva-mxlb.mail.rr.com
*18:44:09 Received: from 188.8.131.52 by hrndva-iedge08.mail.rr.com
x18:44:01 Received: from yzma.clarkk.net by yzma.clarkk.net
!18:43:39 Received: from mail-wy0-f177.google.com by yzma.clarkk.net
*18:43:38 Received: by wyf23
*18:43:38 Received: by 10.216.85.2
*18:43:18 Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:43:18 -0500
Judge Murphy's Arguments:
See my gratuitous arguments and evidence.
It's reasonably clear that Wooble intended to test a couple of
borderline issues, hence reasonable ambiguity exists, hence FALSE.