============================ Appeal 2674b ============================
Panelist: ais523
Decision: REMAND
Panelist: omd
Decision: REMAND
Panelist: Murphy
Decision: REMAND
Panelist: ə
Decision: REMAND
Panelist: Walker
Decision: REMAND
========================================================================
History:
Appeal initiated: 09 Sep 2009 17:04:15 GMT
Assigned to ais523 (panelist): 23 Sep 2009 22:15:07 GMT
Assigned to omd (panelist): 23 Sep 2009 22:15:07 GMT
Assigned to Murphy (panelist): 23 Sep 2009 22:15:07 GMT
Assigned to ə (panelist): 23 Sep 2009 22:15:07 GMT
Assigned to Walker (panelist): 23 Sep 2009 22:15:07 GMT
Walker moves to REMAND: 24 Sep 2009 18:45:25 GMT
ais523 moves to REMAND: 27 Sep 2009 20:58:17 GMT
omd moves to REMAND: 13 Oct 2009 00:17:00 GMT
Murphy moves to REMAND: 13 Oct 2009 00:17:00 GMT
ə moves to REMAND: 13 Oct 2009 00:17:00 GMT
Final decision (REMAND): 13 Oct 2009 00:17:00 GMT
========================================================================
Panelist ais523's Arguments:
I opine REMAND on every appeal case I can (for the obvious corrections
to avoid dinging the judge, and for the BobTHJ cases so that the judge
can take eir comments into account if e wishes; I think re-judging the
same judgement in the BobTHJ cases would be fine, but recent arguments
should probably be addressed).
========================================================================
Panelist omd's Arguments:
[no opinion given]
========================================================================
Panelist Murphy's Arguments:
[opinion given as CotC]
========================================================================
Panelist ə's Arguments:
[no opinion given]
========================================================================