Index ← 2501 CFJ 2502 2503 → text
==============================  CFJ 2502  ==============================

    CFJ 2500 has been appealed.

========================================================================

Caller:                                 ais523

Judge:                                  root
Judgement:                              


Judge:                                  BobTHJ
Judgement:                              TRUE

========================================================================

History:

Called by ais523:                       05 May 2009 18:57:42 GMT
Assigned to root:                       05 May 2009 19:14:27 GMT
root recused:                           17 May 2009 21:31:40 GMT
Assigned to BobTHJ:                     17 May 2009 21:36:39 GMT
Judged TRUE by BobTHJ:                  22 May 2009 04:12:18 GMT

========================================================================

Caller's Arguments:

Does it matter which intent was the one that caused the
appeal?

========================================================================

Caller's Evidence:

On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 11:52 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Goethe wrote:
>
> > I intend to call for appeal of this judgement with 2 support.
>
> I support both comex's and Goethe's intents, and encourage one of em
> to support the other and initiate the appeal.

I support both intents, and initiate the appeal.

========================================================================

Judge BobTHJ's Arguments:

To answer the caller's arguments: No, it does not matter which intent
caused the appeal as far as I can determine. Completing either intent
would initiate the same action and therefore completing one or both in
the quoted message did cause CFJ 2502 to be appealed. I rule TRUE.

========================================================================