============================== CFJ 2392 ==============================
The rulekeepor published the Short Logical Ruleset, on or about
19-Feb-09, in such a way as to satisfy that part of eir weekly
Called by G.: 27 Feb 2009 17:15:20 GMT
Assigned to Murphy: 28 Feb 2009 22:31:33 GMT
Judged FALSE by Murphy: 28 Feb 2009 22:54:29 GMT
The alleged SLR published on 19-Feb-09 was missing the text of R2125, and
a non-rules text was in its place. The question is how much of a report's
required contents have to be present in a message for it to be considered
a publication of the report (albeit an inaccurate one) versus not actually
being the report?
Rule 1681/16 The Logical Rulesets [extract]:
The listing of each rule in the SLR must include the rule's ID
number, revision number, power, committee assignments (if any),
title, and text.
Rule 1051/18 The Rulekeepor [extract]:
The Rulekeepor's Weekly report includes the Short Logical
Rule 2143/4 Official Reports and Duties [extract]:
Any information defined by the rules as part of an office's
report, without specifying which one, is part of its weekly
Judge Murphy's Arguments:
Rulekeepor comex admitted in
that e deliberately published an inaccurate report (even if e did not
intend it to be misleading).
The question of whether an unintentionally inaccurate report still
counts as a report is beyond the scope of this case, and worth exploring
separately. In such a circumstance, Rule 1504 (d) and (e) protect the
author from punishment, but not from (e.g.) failure to earn a Note.