============================== CFJ 2390 ==============================
ehird initiated an inquiry case in the message archived at http://ww
Called by Murphy: 24 Feb 2009 19:55:58 GMT
Assigned to omd: 24 Feb 2009 20:20:54 GMT
Transferred from omd to ehird: 27 Feb 2009 15:22:49 GMT
Judged TRUE by ehird: 27 Feb 2009 15:22:49 GMT
See CFJ 2389, which informally disputes this statement on the grounds
that the body alone does not clearly constitute an attempt to act. I
argue further that, even so, a subject line clearly intended to direct
the interpretation of the body should be allowed to do so.
Judge ehird's Arguments:
Subjects should not be interpreted as game actions in the
general case; this is established precedent. However, in the lack of
context to make a message meaningful, the Subject line can provide
necessary context for the actions within. This is pure common sense
and, IMO, for the Good of the Game.