Index ← 2375a CFJ 2375 2376a → text
=========================  Criminal Case 2375  =========================

    Murphy violated R1868 (power 2) by failing to assign a judge to CFJ
    2201 as soon as possible after it came to require a judge.

========================================================================

Caller:                                 omd
Barred:                                 Murphy

Judge:                                  woggle
Judgement:                              GUILTY/APOLOGY

Appeal:                                 2375a
Decision:                               REMAND


Judge:                                  woggle
Judgement:                              GUILTY/DISCHARGE

========================================================================

History:

Called by omd:                          09 Feb 2009 23:42:28 GMT
Assigned to woggle:                     10 Feb 2009 06:07:38 GMT
Defendant Murphy informed:              10 Feb 2009 07:42:28 GMT
Judged GUILTY/APOLOGY by woggle:        10 Feb 2009 23:11:51 GMT
Appealed by omd:                        11 Feb 2009 22:35:17 GMT
Appealed by Murphy:                     11 Feb 2009 22:56:27 GMT
Appealed by G.:                         11 Feb 2009 23:05:46 GMT
Appeal 2375a:                           11 Feb 2009 23:05:46 GMT
REMANDED on Appeal:                     21 Feb 2009 18:02:13 GMT
Assigned to woggle:                     21 Feb 2009 18:02:13 GMT
Judged GUILTY/DISCHARGE by woggle:      24 Feb 2009 06:35:18 GMT

========================================================================

Judge woggle's Arguments:

GUILTY / APOLOGY - exception, batch, late, docket, 2200, 2202, 2203.

========================================================================

Appellant omd's Arguments:

I intend with 2 support to appeal the questions on sentencing in CFJs
2373 and 2375, on the grounds that failing to assign judges to some
old cases does not deserve a formal apology unless someone
demonstrates that they were actually disadvantaged by the lateness.

========================================================================

Judge woggle's Arguments:

In light of R2339, I rejudge DISCHARGE on sentencing in CFJ 2373 and
DISCHARGE on sentencing in CFJ 2375.

========================================================================