============================== CFJ 2350 ==============================
Any player can flip the Conductor's Key by announcement, at most
once per month.
Called by ais523: 20 Jan 2009 19:27:47 GMT
Assigned to omd: 26 Jan 2009 07:48:04 GMT
Judged FALSE by omd: 26 Jan 2009 15:22:10 GMT
These hinge around what "eir" refers to in each case. Both sentences
have an "eir" which could either refer to something in the same
sentence, or something in a previous sentence; the posture case is
dubious due to the large separation between the sentences, whereas the
key case is much less dubious as the sentences are consecutive and in
the same paragraph. A construction like "ehird is the Monkey, and any
player CAN change eir intelligence by announcement." has its eir pretty
clearly referring to ehird. When split into two sentences, as "ehird is
the Monkey. Any player CAN change eir intelligence by announcement.",
does it still mean the same thing? On balance, I think it probably does,
as long as the sentences are not so ridiculously far apart as to be
implausible. So I recommend FALSE and TRUE on the two CFJs respectively.
An excerpt from rule 2126:
Key is a player switch, tracked by the Conductor, with values
equal to the pitches that Notes can have, defaulting to C. A
player CAN change eir Key to any value by announcement, unless e
has already done so during the current month.
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 19:15 +0000, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 10:54 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > >> 6059 D 1 2.0 comex "Voluntary" creation of rests
> > > FOR
> > I've found the scam here I believe; I'm not going to describe it
> > while this is being voted for in case comex hasn't thought of it :),
> > but I strongly recommend Against here. -Goethe
> I flip Wooble's key to F#.
> I flip Murphy's posture to leaning and hawkishness to hugging.
Judge omd's Arguments:
Out of context, the caller's arguments are valid. However, it is
customary in Agora to apply a standard of reasonableness to
interpretation of communication. As a general rule, it is more
reasonable for players to be able to modify their own properties than,
collectively, a single player's; so a sentence of the form "A player
CAN X eir Y by announcement" is naturally biased towards the Y being
the player's own. While the monkey example is ambiguous (its meaning
would depend on the definition of Intelligence, and context; and any
such rule ought to be stated more clearly), in the case of Keys, the
interpretation that players can change their own Keys is by far the
most reasonable one. Accordingly, FALSE.