============================== CFJ 2281 ==============================
CFJ 2252 exists.
Called by Murphy: 19 Nov 2008 02:46:17 GMT
Assigned to root: 19 Nov 2008 02:55:52 GMT
root recused: 02 Dec 2008 07:41:32 GMT
Assigned to BobTHJ: 02 Dec 2008 07:44:26 GMT
Judged TRUE by BobTHJ: 05 Dec 2008 22:42:45 GMT
[Pavitra's comments on comex's claim that CFJ 2252 does not exist]
On Saturday 08 November 2008 08:50:51 pm comex wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Ed Murphy
> > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2252
> > ============================== CFJ 2252
> > ==============================
> > (the rules of Agora)
> > =================================================================
> The purported statement of this inquiry case is a set of Rules.
> While these Rules do contain statements, even a set of statements
> is not itself a well-formed statement because there is no clear
> linkage of the substatements. Therefore I rule that this CFJ does
> not exist (so no judgement is applicable).
When interpreting and applying the Rules as a whole in every context
prior to this case, we have always (as far as I know) treated them as
implicitly ANDed; for example, we have never held that persons can
choose to be bound only by an arbitrary subset of the Rules.
I request that the above, and my earlier statements arguing for a
trivial TRUE, be included in the official record as gratuitous
Also, you can't rule on a CFJ that doesn't exist, so your attempted
ruling is nonsensical.
Judge BobTHJ's Arguments:
I rule TRUE. In matters of controversy (which the CFJ system is
designed to handle) it is best to err on the side of inclusion rather