Index ← 1896a CFJ 1896 1897a → text
==============================  CFJ 1896  ==============================

    There exists a R2160 'position' that is not an office


Caller:                                 omd

Judge:                                  Murphy
Judgement:                              FALSE

Appeal:                                 1896a
Decision:                               OVERRULE/TRUE



Called by omd:                          03 Feb 2008 22:32:33 GMT
Assigned to Murphy:                     03 Feb 2008 22:52:01 GMT
Judged FALSE by Murphy:                 03 Feb 2008 23:03:22 GMT
Appealed by Murphy:                     03 Feb 2008 23:05:03 GMT
Appealed by Iammars:                    03 Feb 2008 23:10:26 GMT
Appealed by Jeremy:                     03 Feb 2008 23:40:25 GMT
Appeal 1896a:                           03 Feb 2008 23:42:52 GMT
OVERRULED to TRUE on Appeal:            04 Feb 2008 23:03:53 GMT


Caller's Arguments:

A lookup of 'position' on includes these as the only
relevant definitions:

5. A situation as it relates to the surrounding circumstances: in a
position to bargain.
8. A post of employment; a job.

I argue that (8) is more appropriate, since (5) would not necessarily
include offices.

Furthermore, Rule 2160 notes
> > (or, if the position is vacant, would so require if the position were

Makes sense for offices, and maybe other things (vote collector?) but
is absolutely meaningless if a person is a position.

Finally, 'position' *is* used elsewhere in the rules, but only in a
rule about offices:

Rule 2154/5 (Power=2)
Replacing Officers
      If intent to achieve consent for a nominee is announced as
      above, then any other active player may be nominated for the
      position with eir own consent by announcement, during the
      minimum waiting period between intent and action defined for
      Agoran Consent.


Judge Murphy's Arguments:

A judgeship is such a position.  I judge FALSE.


Appellant Murphy's Arguments:

Aww, crap, I trivially FALSEd where I meant to TRUE.