============================== CFJ 1896 ==============================
There exists a R2160 'position' that is not an office
Called by omd: 03 Feb 2008 22:32:33 GMT
Assigned to Murphy: 03 Feb 2008 22:52:01 GMT
Judged FALSE by Murphy: 03 Feb 2008 23:03:22 GMT
Appealed by Murphy: 03 Feb 2008 23:05:03 GMT
Appealed by Iammars: 03 Feb 2008 23:10:26 GMT
Appealed by Jeremy: 03 Feb 2008 23:40:25 GMT
Appeal 1896a: 03 Feb 2008 23:42:52 GMT
OVERRULED to TRUE on Appeal: 04 Feb 2008 23:03:53 GMT
A lookup of 'position' on answers.com includes these as the only
5. A situation as it relates to the surrounding circumstances: in a
position to bargain.
8. A post of employment; a job.
I argue that (8) is more appropriate, since (5) would not necessarily
Furthermore, Rule 2160 notes
> > (or, if the position is vacant, would so require if the position were
Makes sense for offices, and maybe other things (vote collector?) but
is absolutely meaningless if a person is a position.
Finally, 'position' *is* used elsewhere in the rules, but only in a
rule about offices:
Rule 2154/5 (Power=2)
If intent to achieve consent for a nominee is announced as
above, then any other active player may be nominated for the
position with eir own consent by announcement, during the
minimum waiting period between intent and action defined for
Judge Murphy's Arguments:
A judgeship is such a position. I judge FALSE.
Appellant Murphy's Arguments:
Aww, crap, I trivially FALSEd where I meant to TRUE.