============================== CFJ 1550 ==============================
When a proposal is aborted, all votes cast on it are canceled.
Called by root: 18 Apr 2005 04:22:42 GMT
Assigned to OscarMeyr: 18 Apr 2005 08:33:46 GMT
Judged FALSE by OscarMeyr: 21 Apr 2005 01:26:15 GMT
Appealed by Maud: 25 Apr 2005 01:16:01 GMT
Appealed by Taral: 25 Apr 2005 14:44:25 GMT
Appealed by Sherlock: 26 Apr 2005 23:30:23 GMT
Appealed by G.: 26 Apr 2005 23:48:58 GMT
Appeal 1550a: 26 Apr 2005 23:48:58 GMT
SUSTAINED on Appeal: 03 Jun 2005 13:43:44 GMT
Appealed by G.: 03 Jun 2005 18:24:37 GMT
Appealed by Maud: 03 Jun 2005 18:27:31 GMT
Appealed by Taral: 03 Jun 2005 20:29:08 GMT
Appeal 1550b: 03 Jun 2005 20:29:08 GMT
REVERSED on Appeal: 19 Jun 2005 21:44:50 GMT
Rule 2033 (Power=1) explicitly asserts that statements 1), 2), 3), and
4) are true.
Concerning statement 2):
Rule 106 (Power=3) reads, in part, "all Proposals made and distributed
in the proper way shall be voted upon." Here, I interpret "voted upon"
to mean the strong sense that votes on the issue are recorded and
weighed, rather than the weaker sense that some player has cast a vote
upon the issue, which may or may not still be valid. This strongly
suggests to me that the votes cast upon a proposal cannot be wholly
swept aside as R2033 purports to do; otherwise, the Proposal has not
been voted upon.
Judge OscarMeyr's Arguments:
I am swayed by the Caller's argument. R106 prevents votes on
an aborted Proposal from being canceled; accordingly, the votes made
before the Proposal was aborted should be duly recorded and reported.
(I do not intend for this ruling to be retroactive.)
Appellant Taral's Arguments:
The phrase "made and distributed in the proper way" would indicate that
R106 does not apply to aborted proposals. Even if it does apply, this
would make R2033 wholly ineffective, preventing termination of the
Appellant G.'s Arguments:
In CFJ 1550, caller root's arguments were:
> "I interpret "voted upon" to mean the strong sense that votes on the issue
are recorded and weighed,"
However, Judge OscarMeyr provided the argument that: "the votes made before
the Proposal was aborted should be duly recorded and reported." This is the
phrasology which Justcie Manu specifically
quoted in sustaining the argument.
The issue at hand is not that of reporting, it is possible to report a vote as
CANCELLED. Therefore, neither Judge OscarMeyr nor Justice Manu provided any
reasonable arguments as to whether a vote should be WEIGHED, that is,
considered not cancelled, and that is vital for CFJ1550 to be found false.