============================ Appeal 1449a ============================
Appeal initiated: 20 Mar 2003 00:36:51 GMT
Assigned to Steve (panelist): 21 Mar 2003 00:08:40 GMT
Assigned to Taral (panelist): 21 Mar 2003 00:08:40 GMT
Assigned to Pakaran (panelist): 21 Mar 2003 00:08:40 GMT
Steve moves to REVERSE: 24 Mar 2003 00:54:12 GMT
Pakaran moves to REVERSE: 24 Mar 2003 02:32:14 GMT
Taral moves to REMAND: 28 Mar 2003 00:08:40 GMT
Final decision (REVERSE): 28 Mar 2003 00:08:40 GMT
Panelist Steve's Arguments:
(See Appeal 1448a.)
Likewise, I overturn Goethe's Judgement and return a Judgement of FALSE
in CFJ 1449.
Panelist Pakaran's Arguments:
It appears to be unambigiously clear that one cannot pay a fee by
transfering 0 currency, since one cannot transfer 0 currency at all. While
Rubberstamping does not require a fee, one may not rubberstamp by paying a
fee of 0 - one may make a proposal distributable without Rubberstamping by
paying an appropriate Fee, but that is another matter.
This Appeals Judge OVERTURNS the original judgement, and returns a
judgement of FALSE in the matter of CFJ 1149a.
Panelist Taral's Arguments:
See arguments in Appeal 1448a.