============================== CFJ 1278 ==============================
The Assessor has announced the results of the voting on Proposal
Called by Murphy: 21 Feb 2001 09:28:46 GMT
Assigned to Syllepsis: 26 Feb 2001 08:26:13 GMT
Judged TRUE by Syllepsis: 28 Feb 2001 14:17:21 GMT
Assigned to root: 26 Aug 2005 17:19:43 GMT
Judged TRUE by root: 17 Oct 2005 01:32:49 GMT
E has correctly announced the Vote count, but incorrectly announced
the result of that Vote count - namely whether Proposal 4111 was
Judge Syllepsis's Arguments:
It is unclear in the rules if an incorrect announcement is to be
considered an announcement at all. Logically, it seems that an incorrect
announcement of some results would actually be an announcement of results
that never took place, and so in this case the results would not have been
In t's "Assessor's Voting Report" dated Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:38:43 e
announces first the following:
Num. Type Proposer AI Title RESULT F A - *
4111 Dem Elysion 2 Oligarchy Reform v1.2 FAILS/Q 3 0 0
4112 Ord t 1 Banking Developments PASSES 11 2 0 -
Here t has announced a set of results different from the actual voting
results, and has hence not announced the actual results of the vote. So at
this point, the results have not been announced.
However, t continues:
(vacant) Elysion 3F
Blob Wes F
Steve 2F Steve 2F
harvel Michael 2F
Peekee Goethe A
Wes F Lindrum F
FOR 3 11 FOR
AGAINST 0 2 AGAINST
ABSTAIN 0 0 ABSTAIN
Voters 2 9 Voters
Quorum? N 6/Y Quorum?
PASSES? N Y PASSES?
The above text is an actual legible, reasonably understandable
announcement of the results of the voting on roposal 4111.
I then conclude that t first erroneously announced a set of results
different from the results (and hence had not announced the results yet),
but then announced the actual results immediately afterwards. It follows
that the Assessor has announced the results of Proposal 4111.