Index ← 1167 CFJ 1168 1169 → text
From: Wes Contreras 
To: agora-off 
Subject: OFF: CFJ 1168 Judged FALSE
Date: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 2:02 PM


======================================================================
                              CFJ 1168

    Michael has failed to comply with an agreement that e made with
    Peekee, and so has broken the agreement.

======================================================================

Called by:           Peekee

Judge:               Wes
Judgement:           FALSE

Judge selection:

Eligible:            Wes

Not eligible:
Caller:              Peekee
Barred:              -
Had their turn:      Annabel, Beefurabi, Blob, Chuck, Crito, Elysion,
                     harvel, Kolja, Lee, Michael, Murphy, Palnatoke
Already served:      -
Defaulted:           -
By request:          -
On Hold:             elJefe, Oerjan, Steve

======================================================================

History:

Called by Peekee:                     14 Sep 1999 08:40:11 EDT
Assigned to Wes:                      14 Sep 1999 18:30:16 -0700

=====================================================================

Caller's Arguments:

The agreement was that Michael would pay the cost of my votes
against ASOMBNOP.  However, dispite being able to Michael has never
paid me the 4 -VTs that e should of.

======================================================================

Evidence attached by the Caller:

Sadly I cannot access the archieves to get the mail that Michael
sent. However, I do have a copy of my message to the PF casting the
votes.

>>

Thema:  Re: BUS: votes
Datum:  19.08.99
An: agora-business@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au

> Further, I make the following offer: noting the general paucity of
>  -VTs, I will cover the costs of anyone choosing to vote AGAINST 3897.

I hereby cast 2 Votes Against P3897.

Peekee

<<

This does not contain the date of Michael's Offer, but I'm sure the
archieves
will contain that message.

The text "I will cover the costs of anyone choosing to vote AGAINST
3897" does clearly show that agreements where made between Michael
and any Players that voted AGAINST P3897.  Also, there is no doubt
that I did vote AGAINST P3897.  So an agreement was made between
myself and Michael.  Michael has broken that agreement by not covering
my costs.  Allthough e did not give a time limit, there are previous
CJFs that would suggest that such actions that have no time limtis
must be carried out in reasonable time.

======================================================================

Judge's Arguments:

At this time, the agreement has been fulfilled, as Michael has
paid the necessary VTs.

======================================================================