Index ← 1164 CFJ 1165 1166 → text
From: Wes Contreras 
To: agora-off 
Subject: OFF: CFJ 1165 Judged TRUE
Date: Sunday, September 12, 1999 3:51 PM


JUDICIAL ORDER (by Judge Murphy):
I issue a Judicial Order, directed to the Registrar, to vacate RIP077.

======================================================================
                              CFJ 1165

    RIPO77 was improperly executed.

======================================================================

Called by:           Elysion

Judge:               Murphy
Judgement:           TRUE

Judge selection:

Eligible:            Murphy, Palnatoke, Peekee, Wes

Not eligible:
Caller:              Elysion
Barred:              -
Had their turn:      Annabel, Beefurabi, Blob, Chuck, Crito, Elysion,
                     harvel, Kolja, Lee, Michael
Already served:      -
Defaulted:           -
By request:          -
On Hold:             elJefe, Oerjan, Steve

======================================================================

History:

Called by Murphy:                     06 Sep 1999 08:33:28 -0400
Assigned to Murphy:                   06 Sep 1999 07:14:00 -0700
Judged TRUE by Murphy:                11 Sep 1999 08:40:46 -0700
Judgement Distributed:                As of this message

=====================================================================

Caller's Arguments:

The datestamp on the Assessor's message was Mon, 6 Sep 1999 18:10:49
+1000. The datestamp on the Registrar's message issuing RIPO77 was
Mon, 6 Sep 1999 09:19:27 +0100 (BST). Therefore, proposal 3902 took
effect almost 9 minutes before Registrar Michael issued the PO. Thus,
the amended form of rule 1686 was in effect. The penalty for Failing
to Report, as specified in the new rule 1686, is the same as a class
D crime. However, ASoMBNoP eliminated letter-class crimes.

Therefore, no penalty can be assessed against Murphy, since there
is no penalty that is the same as a nonexistant definition.

======================================================================

Evidence attached by the Caller:

Exhibit A: The header from the Assessor's report on proposal 3902
-----------------------------------------------------------------

>From owner-agora-official@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au Mon Sep 06 02:31:34 1999
Received: from [131.170.42.16] by hotmail.com (2.1) with ESMTP id
MHotMailB99CD4F30014D820F3B683AA2A103ACB0; Mon Sep 06 02:31:34 1999
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
 by gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA26697
 for agora-official-list; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 08:12:34 GMT
Received: from fw.serc.rmit.edu.au (fw-in.serc.rmit.edu.au [131.170.42.1])
 by gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA26694
 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 08:12:32 GMT
Received: (from mail@localhost)
 by fw.serc.rmit.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id SAA10693
 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 18:20:40 +1000
(EST)
Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.edu.au(129.94.242.29) by
fw.serc.rmit.edu.au via smap (V2.1)
 id xma010689; Mon, 6 Sep 99 18:20:10 +1000
Received: From mozart With LocalMail ; Mon, 6 Sep 99 18:10:49 +1000
From: Malcolm Ryan 
To: Agora Official 
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 18:10:49 +1000
Message-ID: <19990906181049.A22077@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Subject: OFF: Assessor's Report for Proposals 3900-3903
Mail-Followup-To: Agora Official 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i
Sender: owner-agora-official@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: agora-discussion@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au


Exhibit B: Rule 376/4
---------------------

Rule 376/4 (Power=1)
When Proposals Take Effect

      A Proposal which is Adopted takes effect at the time date-
      stamped on the first message sent by the Assessor to reach
      the Public Forum announcing the results of the voting on that
      Proposal.

      If the message sent by the Assessor announcing the results of
      the voting on a Proposal also contains the results of voting
      upon other Proposals, all such Proposals shall take effect at
      the same time, but in the order in which they were distributed.


Exhibit C: The message assigning RIPO77 to Murphy
-------------------------------------------------

>From owner-agora-official@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au Mon Sep 06 01:54:10 1999
Received: from [131.170.42.16] by hotmail.com (2.1) with ESMTP id
MHotMailB99CCC300190D82197B683AA2A1035B60; Mon Sep 06 01:54:10 1999
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
 by gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA26737
 for agora-official-list; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 08:20:04 GMT
Received: from fw.serc.rmit.edu.au (fw-in.serc.rmit.edu.au [131.170.42.1])
 by gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA26734
 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 08:20:02 GMT
Received: (from mail@localhost)
 by fw.serc.rmit.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id SAA10717
 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 18:28:10 +1000
(EST)
Received: from heaton.cl.cam.ac.uk(128.232.32.11) by fw.serc.rmit.edu.au via
smap (V2.1)
 id xma010715; Mon, 6 Sep 99 18:28:04 +1000
Received: from albatross.cl.cam.ac.uk ([128.232.0.96] ident=mn200)
 by heaton.cl.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.01 #1)
 id 11Ntzt-0003j4-00; Mon, 06 Sep 1999 09:19:29 +0100
Received: from mn200 by albatross.cl.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.01 #2)
 id 11Ntzr-0000C1-00; Mon, 06 Sep 1999 09:19:27 +0100
From: Michael Norrish 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14291.30991.700356.257042@albatross.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 09:19:27 +0100 (BST)
To: agora-official@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au
Subject: OFF: Failure to Report Infraction
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 19.34.1
Sender: owner-agora-official@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: agora-discussion@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au

I hereby order Murphy to pay the Bank 2 Indulgences (RIPO77) for
committing the Infraction of Failure to Report as Notary.

Registrar Michael.


Exhibit D: The amended form of rule 1686 from Proposal 3902
-----------------------------------------------------------

Amend Rule 1686 (Official Reports) to read:

      For each Office, the corresponding Officer's Report is the set
      of information designated as such by the Rules.  If no
      information is so designated, then that Office has no Officer's
      Report.

      All Officer's Reports are Official Reports.

      The holder of an Office for which there is an Officer's Report
      shall maintain all information in the Report, and shall post it
      to the Public Forum at least once every Nomic Week.  Failure to
      post the Official Report in a Nomic Week is the Infraction of
      Failure to Report, the penalty for which is the same as the
      penalty for a Class D Crime.  The Registrar and the Speaker are
      authorised to detect and report commissions of this Infraction.

======================================================================

Judge's Arguments:


======================================================================