Approximation on Finite Elements

4/23/02


Click here to start


Table of Contents

Approximation on Finite Elements

The function x^2 exp(y-0.5) looks like this when plotted:

Approximation on finite elements

Here is what we expect in a contour plot of the function:

This is for N x N blocks, N=4

N =8

N = 16

N = 32

N = 64

N = 128

This is mesh refinement.

PPT Slide

Let functions in the block be bilinear functions of u and v.

N = 4, bilinear interpolation

N = 8, bilinear interpolation

N = 16, bilinear interpolation

Compare constant interpolation on finite elements with bilinear interpolation on finite elements.

Instead of matching the function at the block-corners, find the best interpolant minimizing the mean square difference between the approximation and the exact function. Still use finite elements, but bilinear approximations.

What do you do if you don’t know the function? Suppose you want to minimize the difference between the approximation and exact function and their derivatives.

One can still find the best finite element approximation that minimizes this integral. It won’t fit the function exactly anywhere, nor the first derivative, but it will minimize the integral.

Calculus of Variations

We choose finite element functions which satisfy the boundary conditions, and then find the values of the parameters that make the integral a minimum.

The solution with linear elements on 312 triangles (177 nodes) is:

The solution with linear elements on 1248 triangles (665 nodes) is:

Finite Element Variational Method

Galerkin Finite Element Method

Conclusion - Three Basic Ideas

Author: Bruce A. Finlayson

Email: finlayson@cheme.washington.edu

Home Page: http://faculty.washington.edu/finlayso

Other information:
Copyright, 2002, Bruce A. Finlayson

Download presentation source