| SITE MAP | SEARCH! | E & B GEOG | RESOURCES | A-Z INDEX |
Modify (in three different ways) the simple Milltown multiplier example used in class (propensity to consume locally = .8; import propensity of local service sector = .75]
How do (a) the multiplier(s) and (b) the total income change after
we account for some remarkable changes occurring in our community. While
40% of ATC's wage bill goes to workers retained and relocated
from its former location into our community (Some of these workers are
sending part of their pay-ckecks to their families left behind and, as a
group, thus have a lower local consumption propensity [pcl=.6] than the
existing workers/households), the
other 60% go to workers recruited locally and largely consist of formerly
unemployed spouses of MGCC workers. The additional income earned by
this second-income-household labor force is half saved and half spent
locally.
After
all this has happened, the local service sector "decides" that
the additional local income justifies some more local production of
locally consumed products (=import substitution). As a result, the service
sector "leakage" coefficient declines from .75 to .65 . Calculate the new
total income.
Establish the coefficient matrix for this
new expanded
economy.
Please Note:
|
To: From: |
Milltown Grey Cloth |
Households |
Local Services |
|
Milltown Grey Cloth |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Households |
.8 |
0 |
.25 |
|
Local Services |
0 |
.8 |
0 |
|
Imports |
.2 |
.1 |
.75 |
|
Savings |
0 |
.1 |
0 |
|
Total |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |