PHIL 338. FINAL PROJECT (Research Paper 6-7 Pages)

(70 Points Total: 10 Points for Draft, 10 Points for Your Comments on Two Other Drafts, and 100 Points for the Final)

A. Research Paper (5-7 Pages, 300 Words Per Page). The U.N. has asked our class for suggestions on updating the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. You are to pick a human rights issue involving the rights of normal, human adults that is currently a live issue. Some sample topics are listed below, but you are not limited to those on the list. There are two limitations: (1) you should not write on the same issue that you discussed in Homework #4; (2) you should not write on a topic (e.g. abortion) that would be covered in a standard contemporary moral problems course. One way to be sure you are not overlapping a contemporary moral problems course is to pick a human rights issue with an international dimension. If you have any questions about your topic, discuss them with your TA. You are to write a report in which you introduce an important real-world human rights issue by describing a real-world situation in which the issue has arisen, present the best arguments you can on both sides of the issue, and then make your own recommendation on how the Universal Declaration of Human Rights should be updated to address the issue. Your recommendation could be to add a new right to the Universal Declaration, to eliminate one of the rights currently included in the Universal Declaration, or to clarify one of the rights currently included. Make it clear in your paper what your recommendation to the U.N. is.

Because you will be graded on your presentation of the arguments on both sides of the issue, you should pick an issue where a good case can be made for both sides. Make sure you explain the issue for the reader before you turn to the arguments pro and con. In your report, you should refer to at least two of the readings for this course. In addition, you should show that you have done your own research by citing other sources outside the course readings. At a minimum (this is only a minimum), you should cite at least four Web sites with information on the relevant issue. You should include in your report your evaluation of the reliability of any Web sites that you cite. You may read ahead and write on an issue that has not yet been discussed in class, if you wish. But you are not limited to topics discussed in this course.

The Final Project is an opportunity for you to explain how you would resolve a human rights issue. I expect you to give reasons for your position. Please keep in mind that this is a philosophy course, so the reasons that you give should not include an appeal to a religious or other authority. In preparing your Final Project, I want you to exercise your moral judgment based on your consideration of the reasons pro and con. I want you to evaluate the reasons yourself. Even if you rely on a religious authority in your personal life, an appeal to that authority is not appropriate for this assignment. Also, the issue cannot be settled by what the law is today, because I am asking you to consider what the law should be.

Be creative. On the Web, you will probably be able to find photos and other graphic material that will make your Final Project more compelling. When you prepare your draft, use the Peer Review Checklist to make sure it is complete. The Peer Review Checklist can be accessed on the PHIL 338 Web site.

Possible research paper topics:

Conflicts between group rights and individual rights (e.g., individual freedom of expression vs. a group right to respect for its beliefs or to protection against "hate" speech; group self-determination vs. individual self-determination; or the right of children to an education vs. the right of religious or cultural groups to limit the education of their children).

Conflicts between national or group sovereignty and the enforcement of human rights (e.g., interventions to prevent human rights violations or the role of the International Criminal Court).

These are just examples. There are many other issues that would make a good research paper.

B. Service Learning Report (4-5 Pages, 300 Words Per Page). For those who choose the service learning option, your final project will be a report on your service learning organization, with emphasis on the human rights issues that it addresses. In your report, you should give the reader background on your organization and the problems it addresses. You should discuss at least one significant human rights issue. Ideally, it would be an issue that your organization is working on. You should explain your organization's position on the issue and why there is opposition to your organization's position. A significant part of your grade will be based on how well you explain the opposition, so you should choose an issue where you understand the basis for the opposition. Then you should discuss your own ideas for some kind of resolution of the issue.

In your report, you should refer to at least two of the readings in this course. If possible, you should cite Web sites that give more information on your organization and the work it does. Here is an example of one kind of service learning report:

Report on Immigrant rights. Begin by describing the activities of the organization you did service learning for. What did you do for that organization? Then pick an example of a human rights issue your organization works on. For example, a right that your organization believes should be granted to immigrants. Why is it important to guarantee that right to immigrants? Who opposes granting that right to immigrants? Why? How do you think the issue might be resolved?

This is only one example. There are many different topics that you could write on.

FINAL PROJECT DEADLINES

(1) Topic. You must obtain approval for the topic of your final project by the end of by the end of class on Friday, Nov. 14.

(2) Draft posted for Peer Review by midnight on Monday, Nov. 24. A draft of your final project should be posted on the Peer Review site for your section. Include your name in the body of your paper. Before posting your draft, review the peer review checklist to make sure you have covered all the items.

In order to preserve formatting, footnotes, and illustrations, you use your word processor to save the draft of your paper as a Web page (in HTML format) for posting in Peer Review. (Microsoft Word will allow you to save any document file in HTML format, using the "SAVE AS" command. Choose the Save as Web Page option.)

There is a link to the Peer Review site on the PHIL 338 Web page. When you click on the link, you will be asked to log on with your UW NetID and password. The first time you log on, you will choose a color for your comments. Please don't choose a light color (like yellow) that is difficult to read. Then you are ready to post a draft of your paper for review by others. From the Peer Review Menu, choose "Set up a new document for review." Make sure that you choose the correct assignment for your submission (Final Project). Also make sure that your name appears at the beginning of your paper (after the title, if you have one). Peer Review will prompt you for a title. You must enter something ("Final Project" is fine). Then you can upload your paper as a file to the Peer Review site. If you upload the paper, make sure you choose “HTML" (Web page) not “Text” for the format.

If there is a problem with your document, you may delete it and upload a new version. The most common problem is uploading an HTML file as text. If you do this, you will see lots of gibberish. Just delete the document and upload it as a Web page rather than as Text.

HOW TO DELETE A DOCUMENT: Choose the "Edit a document" option and then the "Delete" option. You cannot edit a document that has been uploaded. You must delete it and upload a new version.

OPTIONAL PEER REVIEW TEST ASSIGNMENT. If you have not used Peer Review before, sometime before the beginning of section on Thursday, Nov. 20, it would be a good idea to try posting a short (one- or two-sentence blurb) in HTML format and make a comment on it. If you have any problems, you can get help at the computer centers at Odegaard Library or at Mary Gates Hall. After your test is successful, delete the text document so that you will be able to post your draft.

(3) Comment on two papers on the Peer Review Web site before midnight on Wednesday Nov. 26. From the Peer Review Menu, choose "View and Comment on the Documents in Peer Review." Then choose which assignment you are commenting on. Identify yourself in your first comment on each paper. Positive comments are good, but you should not comment on a paper unless you have some suggestions for improving its content (not just grammar and spelling). Your comments on a paper should always be respectful and considerate of the feelings of the author. As a reviewer, it is your responsibility to make sure that research papers have all the items on the Peer Review Checklist, which can be accessed on the PHIL 338 Web page.

Do not be the second person to comment on a paper unless all other papers posted on the site have already received one set of comments (or unless you have no suggestions for improving any of the papers that have not yet received any comments). Do not be the third person to comment on a paper unless all other papers posted on the site have received two sets of comments (or unless you have no suggestions for improving any of the papers that have received less than two sets of comments). You can place a comment after any sentence in the draft. Place your comments as close as possible to the passage the comment applies to.

(4) Final projects are due in section on Wednesday, Dec. 3. There is no penalty for length per se, but papers exceeding the page limits (7 double-spaced pages for research papers and 5 double-spaced pages for service learning reports) will be penalized, if they could have been shortened by careful editing. (Footnotes, photos, and other graphic material do not count in the page limits.) Although papers are evaluated chiefly on their philosophical merits, grammar, spelling, and diction will also be evaluated. You are expected to express your thoughts in clear, grammatical, English sentences.