LEVELS OF MORAL DISAGREEMENT
(From previous edition of
Beauchamp)
1. Basic, Fundamental, or Ultimate Principles
(e.g., Utilitarian Principle: Maximize Total
Happiness)
+ Very General Facts ŕ
2. General Principles (e.g., Respect Life)
+ General Facts ŕ
3. Rules/Maxims (e.g., Do not kill.)
+ Facts of Particular Situations ŕ
4. Particular Judgments (e.g., Even in a situation
in which they have requested it, one ought not to kill one's parents.)
What is the Philosophical Significance of Moral Diversity/Disagreement?
I.
Descriptive Cultural Relativism About Particular Judgments (DCRAPJ) DOES
NOT IMPLY Descriptive Cultural Relativism About Basic Standards (DCRABS).
II.
Even if Descriptive Cultural Relativism About Basic Standards (DCRABS)
is true, that DOES NOT IMPLY any of the following positions: Normative Cultural Absolutism, Normative
Cultural Relativism, Metaphysical Relativism, or Epistemological Relativism.
THE HUDSON'S BAY NATIVE
AND THE WESTERN EUROPEAN
to kill my parents when they ask me
to.
|
|
HB |
WE |
|
HB
Normative Cultural Absolutism |
|
|
|
WE
Normative Cultural Absolutism |
|
|
|
Normative
Cultural Relativism |
|
|
|
Metaphysical
Relativism (MAR) |
|
|
|
Epistemological
Relativism (MS) |
|
|
TWO ISSUES
1. What is the extent of moral disagreement?
Brandt: Are
there "Ultimate" Moral Disagreements? Brandt's objection to the emphasis on disagreement.
2. What is the best explanation of the moral
disagreement that exists?
MacIntyre's Normative Culture Relativism: Incommensurable premises
Mackie's Metaphysical Relativism (Moral
Anti-Realism): The Error Theory (Note
that his position is technically not moral skepticism.)
ALASDAIR MACINTYRE'S
ARGUMENT FOR IRRECONCILABLE MORAL DISAGREEMENT
1. Different moral traditions have different
and incommensurable moral premises (i.e., basic moral principles).
2. Reasoning proceeds from premises to
conclusions.
3. Different moral traditions will never be
able to reach agreement by reasoning.
What
model of moral reasoning is presupposed by MacIntyre?
What
is an alternative model of moral reasoning?
MORE ON THE HUDSON'S BAY NATIVES
EXAMPLE
HB: 1. I
ought to kill my parents when they request it (I Ought Kill Parents =IOKP).
2.
You ought to kill your parents when they request it (You Ought Kill
Parents =YOKP).
WE: 3. I
ought not to kill my parents when (or even if) they request it [-(I Ought Kill
Parents=-IOKP)].
4.
You ought not to kill your parents when (or even if) they request it
[-(You Ought Kill Parents = -YOKP).
5.
I ought to stop you from killing your parents even if they request it (I
Ought Stop Your Killing Your Parents = IOSYKYP).
|
|
H |
B |
|
W E |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
HBNCA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
WENCA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCR/NRT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MNC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMCTT |
|
|
|
|
|
HBNCA
= Hudson's Bay Normative Cultural Absolutism
WENCA
= Western European Normative Cultural Absolutism
NCR
= Normative Cultural Relativism
NCR/NRT
= Normative Cultural Relativism Qualified
by a Norm of Non-Relative Tolerance
MS
= Moral Skepticism (Epistemological Relativism)
MAR
= Moral Anti-Realism (Metaphysical Relativism)
MNC
= Moral Non-Cognitivism
IMCTT
= It's More Complicated Than That
Relative
Tolerance
(Wishy-Washy Tolerance) = The view that I should be tolerant of other cultures,
because my culture has a norm of tolerance, but that the norm of tolerance does
not apply to cultures that do not have such a norm.
This view holds that there is only a relative
duty to be tolerant of other cultures.
It only applies to cultures that have it. This is the only duty of tolerance that Normative Cultural
Relativism (as defined on the handout) could ever justify. According to NCR, only those cultures with a
norm of tolerance would have a duty to be tolerant.
Although historically, NCR developed
from the thought that the Western European colonists' treatment of the American
Natives was wrong, NCR itself actually implies that their treatment of the
natives was not wrong!
Internal interactions or practices are interactions or
practices that involve only members of the same culture.
External interactions or practices are interactions or
practices that involve members of different cultures.
An internal norm is a norm of a culture that
applies to the culture's internal interactions or practices.
An external norm is a norm of a culture that
applies to the culture's external interactions or practices.
A Non-Relative
Norm of Tolerance = That the members of each culture should follow their
own internal norms (or at least it is morally permissible for them to do so)
and that all cultures (whether or not they accept a norm of tolerance) should
tolerate (not interfere with or attempt to change) other cultures' internal
norms.
This view holds that there is a non-relative
duty to be tolerant of other cultures' internal norms. It applies even to cultures that have a norm
of intolerance toward other cultures.
Talbott's Challenge: To develop a moral theory that is an
alternative to Normative Cultural Absolutism and all the varieties of
Relativism About Morality that go Beyond Descriptive Relativism (Normative
Cultural Relativism, Metaphysical Relativism, and Epistemological Relativism)
The Ultimate Issue:
The Possibility of Moral Progress and Moral Discovery--not Merely
Working Out the Implications of Accepted Principles
BAHA'I
"Blessed
is he who prefers his brother before himself." (Baha'u'llah)
BUDDHISM
"Hurt
not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful." (Udanavarga
5:18)
CHRISTIANITY
"So
whatever you wish that men would do to you, do so to them." (Matthew 7:12)
"Do
unto others as you would have them do unto you." (Luke 6:31)
CONFUCIANISM
"Surely
it is the maxim of lovingkindness: Do
not do to others that which you would not have them do to you." (Analects,
15:23)
HINDUISM
"This
is the sum of true righteousness: Deal
with others as you would have yourself dealt with. Do naught unto others which would cause you pain if done to
you." (Mahabharata 5:1517)
ISLAM
"No
one of you is a believer until he desires for his brother that which he desires
for himself." (Sunnan)
JUDAISM
"You
shall love your neighbor as yourself."(Leviticus 19:18)
TAOISM
The
good man "ought to pity the malignant tendencies of others; to rejoice
over their excellence; to help them in their straits; to regard their gains as
if they were his own, and their losses in the same way." (The Tai-shang,
3)
ZOROASTRIANISM
"That
nature only is good when it shall not do to another whatever is not good for
its own self." (Dadistan-i Dinik, 94:5)
DOES EITHER VERSION OF THE
GOLDEN RULE PROVIDE PURELY DESCRIPTIVE SUFFICIENT CONDITION FOR MORAL
RIGHTNESS?
First
Version of the Golden Rule: Do unto
others as you would have them do unto you.
Let
DUOAYWHTDUY = Doing Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You
Let
R = (Morally) Right
Is
the following implication true:
DUOAYWHTDUY
ŕ R
Is
there a counterexample to this claim of implication—that is:
Is
it possible for an act to be:
DUOAYWHTDUY & -R?
There
are two interpretations of the first version of the Golden Rule, depending
whose preferences are used in interpreting "as you would have them do unto
you". Both interpretations generate
potential counterexamples.
SECOND VERSION OF THE GOLDEN
RULE
Second
Version: Love All Others As Yourself
Let
LAOAY = Loving All Others As Yourself
Is
the following implication true:
LAOAY
ŕ R
Is
there a counterexample to this claim of implication—that is:
Is it possible for an act to be:
LAOAY & -R?
There are potential counterexamples.