Professor
Talbott (Email:
wtalbott@u.washington.edu) Autumn
Quarter 2012
Office: Savery 387 General Studies 197J:
Office
Hours: Thursday 3:30 to 4:30 pm Freshman
Seminar
and by appointment in Philosophy
Phone: 543-5095 Wed.
2:30-3:20
Web
page:
http://faculty.washington.edu/wtalbott/ Savery
408
SYLLABUS
GENERAL STUDIES
197J: FRESHMAN SEMINAR IN PHILOSOPHY
What is Philosophy?
Disability Resources For Students. If
you would like to request academic accommodations due to a disability, please
contact Disability Resources for Students (DRS), 448 Schmitz, (206) 543-8924
(V/TTY). If you have a letter from DRS
indicating you have a disability that requires academic accommodations, please
present the letter to me so we can discuss the accommodations you might need
for the class.
I. Goals of the Seminar: What is Philosophy? This seminar will provide you an informal
introduction to philosophy at the University of Washington. In this seminar, you will learn about some of
the major areas of philosophy, you will read about some of the important
philosophical issues in each of the major areas, and you will have an
opportunity to discuss those issues in an informal setting.
II. Course Requirements: This is a one-credit seminar graded
Credit/No-Credit. The only requirements
are to do the short reading assignment each week; to attend the seminar
sessions; and to participate in the seminar discussion. DO NOT TAKE THIS SEMINAR IF YOU WILL NOT DO
THE READINGS AND ATTEND CLASS. The
seminar will meet ten times during the quarter.
We meet from 2:30 to 3:20 p.m. every Wednesday, except the day before
Thanksgiving. If you are absent from a
seminar session, please send me an email message explaining the absence and
submit a one-page essay on the reading to make up the absence. Absences not made up are grounds for
assigning a grade of No Credit.
III. Course Readings and
Discussion Topics: Course readings
and discussion questions for each session of the seminar will be found
below. Please do the readings and think
about the discussion questions BEFORE the date they are to be discussed. All the readings are collected in a
photocopied reader that is available for purchase at the University
Bookstore. Note that the order that the
readings appear in the Reader is not the order in which we will read
them.
Week
#1, Wed. Sept. 26: Introduction
Week
#2, Wed. Oct. 3: The Euthyphro
Question
Reading: “Euthyphro”, a
dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro, G.M.A. Grube, translator, "Euthyphro",
in Plato: Five Dialogues (Hackett
Publishing Company; 1981). Socrates and Euthyphro meet outside the criminal court. The dialogue begins with Socrates explaining
that he has been indicted by Meletus for corrupting
the young. Then Euthyphro
tells Socrates that he has indicted his father for murder! The remainder of the dialogue is a discussion
of right and wrong. Socrates and Euthyphro use “pious” to refer to what is right and “impious”
to refer to what is wrong. The crucial
question is: Is an act right (pious)
because it is loved by the gods, or is it loved by the gods because it is right
(pious). Focus especially on pp. 11-16
(i.e., focus especially on Reader pp. 36-39).
[READER pp. 34-42]
Week
#3, Wed., Oct.10: Is there any reason to be moral?
Readings: (1) "The Ring of Gyges",
an excerpt from Francis MacDonald Cornford,
translator, The Republic of Plato (New York: Oxford Univ. Press; 1941). How would you behave differently if you had Gyges’ ring? What
would happen if everyone had a ring like that?
[READER pp. 21-22]
(2)
Robert Nozick, "The Experience Machine", from Anarchy, State, and
Utopia (New York: Basic Books;
1974). Would you be willing to hook up
to the Experience Machine for the rest of your life? [READER
pp.
23-24]
Week
#4, Wed. Oct. 27:
Prisoner’s Dilemma/Collective Action Problems
Reading: William Poundstone, Prisoner’s Dilemma (New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday; 1992), excerpt from
Chapter 6. Can you think of other
examples of situations that are like the Many Person Prisoner’s Dilemma? Would you Cooperate
in a Many Person Prisoner’s Dilemma, if you could be a Free Rider and get away
with it? [READER pp. 51-58.]
Week
#5, Wed., Oct. 24:
Are Men Oppressed? Are Women Oppressed?
Reading: Kenneth Clatterbaugh,
"Are Men Oppressed?", from Larry May, Robert
Strikwerda, and Patrick D. Hopkins, eds., Rethinking
Masculinity, 2nd Ed., (New York: Rowman & Littlefield; 1996).
[READER
pp. 25-33]
Week
#6, Wed., Oct. 31: What do we know? How do we know it?
Reading: Wesley C. Salmon, "An Encounter With David Hume", from Joel Feinberg, ed., Reason
and Responsibility, 8th ed., (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.; 1993). What reason do we have to believe that the
sun will rise tomorrow? [READER pp. 3‑20]
Week
#7, Wed., Nov. 7: Minds and Brains
Reading: (1) Charles Marks, "Split
Brains". Could there be two
conscious subjects sharing your body?
[READER
pp. 43-50]
(2) Thomas Nagel, "What is it
Like to be a Bat?", Chapter 12 of Mortal
Questions (Cambridge: Cambridge
Univ. Press; 1979). What is
consciousness? [READER pp. 63-71]
Week
#8, Wed., Nov. 14: Death
Reading: (1) Thomas Nagel, "Death" Chapter 1
of Mortal Questions (Cambridge:
Cambridge Univ. Press; 1979). Is
death at the end of one's natural lifespan good or bad? Which of the following would be better: 100 years of the same kind that you have now
or an eternal life of the same kind that you have now?
[READER
pp. 79-84]
Week
#9, Wed., Nov. 21: No class.
Happy Thanksgiving!
Week
#10, Wed., Nov. 28:
Species Extinction and Other Environmental Issues
(2) Edward O. Wilson, "The
Environmental Ethic", in The Diversity
of Life (Cambridge, MA: Belknap
Press of Harvard University Press; 1992), pp. 343-351. Is the extinction of a species only bad if
the extinction has adverse effects on human beings? [READER pp. 73-78]
Week
#11, Wed., Dec. 5: Final Session/Course Evaluation. Should the U.W. abolish grades?
THIS
SESSION MAY BE RESCHEDULED TO MEET FOR PIZZA AT MY HOUSE, IF WE CAN FIND A TIME
THAT WORKS FOR EVERYONE.
Reading: Robert M. Pirsig, Zen
and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance (New York: William Morrow and Company; 1984; pp.
194-201). The author describes the
attempt of “Phaedrus” to abolish grades in his college writing class. “Phaedrus” thinks of the University as a kind
of church, the Church of Reason.
References to “the Church” are references to this metaphorical Church of
Reason. Do grades help or hinder
education?
[READER
pp. 59-62.]