|
Instructor:
Prof. Alicia Beckford Wassink |
Classroom: JHN
022 |
|
Email: wassink@u.washington.edu |
Meeting time: TTh 1:30-3:20 |
|
Office: PDL
217 |
|
|
Office Hours:
T 10:30-11:30am, and by appointment (with sufficient notice) |
|
|
Canvas site: https://uw.instructure.com/courses/793249 |
|
|
Tegrity (for recorded lectures and slides): uw.tegrity.com |
|
|
Course prerequisites:
LING 200, 400, or equivalent.
Recommended: LING 450. |
|
COURSE
DESCRIPTION
Within the field of
linguistics, Sociolinguistics is the subfield that investigates the
relationships between language variation and social structure. In this course, students will learn how sociolinguistic
research is conducted and will become familiar with the major findings of
research studies that have examined these relationships. The course will focus
largely (but not exclusively) on quantitative methods developed in the
tradition of variationist sociolinguistics, pioneered by William Labov, that
are designed to reveal the way language change is rooted in synchronic
variation. The class will study reports of research focusing variously on
everyday social interaction, on larger scale patterns of social dialect
variation. Relationships between language and social class, language and
gender, and language and ethnicity will be discussed. Other topics covered will
be language and style, and larger-scale social, educational, and political issues
associated with the process of language standardization.
Other courses in the Sociolinguistics
sequence:
note: LING532 is a prerequisite for all of the
below:
LING 533
LING 534
Sociolinguistic Applications of Social Network Theory
LING 535 Advanced Sociolinguistics
Learning
Objectives:
All students will:
COURSE
REQUIREMENTS
You are expected to do all readings before class in order to facilitate discussion and give you time to ask any questions you may have. You are also expected to check Canvas (or ensure you have notifications activated so these are sent to your email account) in order to keep up with any announcements or reminders that I may post. Please bring your notes and any other materials you may need with you to class. Cell phones and laptops should remain off during class (see Fried 2008 in Computers and Education). If for some reason you must show up to class late, please be as quiet as possible out of respect for your fellow students. If you are absent, it is up to you to contact another student to find out what you have missed.
Required
Work:
|
Overview: |
432 |
532 |
|
Daily Readings |
not assessed for grade |
not assessed for grade |
|
Reading Responses &
Article Presentation |
- |
20% |
|
Homework |
30% |
30% |
|
Classroom Participation |
10% |
- |
|
Quizzes |
20% |
20% |
|
Research Project |
30% |
30% |
|
Sociolinguist Trading
Cards |
10% |
- |
|
TOTAL: |
100% |
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
extra credit (assessed
toward final grade): |
+2 points |
+2 points |
1. Daily Readings
2. Homework – 30% (due in
Canvas by classtime)
3. Reading Response & Article
Presentation (532 only) – 20%
LING/ANTH532 students
(individually or in groups) select one report of original research on which to
present in class, from the Ò532 ONLYÓ column in the syllabus. One week prior to this presentation,
presenters complete a reading response to focus their reading and provide them
an opportunity to summarize the key concepts in the article. (Create a date for this on your personal
calendar!)
á
Readings
may be extensive and complex. Start early to give yourself time to fully digest
the material.
á
Use
office hours to discuss the article content, and locate any additional readings
that might help you interpret research methods and findings.
á
Remember
that your classmates will be held responsible for your presentation content (in
quizzes). Make certain you
incorporate concepts from lecture, and relate your discussion to other class
readings.
á
Ask
classmates to critically consider, with you, the strengths and weaknesses of
your study. Continue this discussion online in a Canvas discussion thread.
4. Classroom
Participation (432 only)– 10%
5. Quizzes – 20%
6.
Research Project – 30% (Milestones are due in Canvas by 5pm
on listed dates)
7. Sociolinguist Trading Cards Project (432 only) – 10%
Extra credit
– Upto ½ letter grade
will be added to the final grade for any student who locates a sociolinguistic
variable in the media (including current events, news and online or text
sources). They may add a discussion
thread to the Canvas site, including a link to the online or news article that
is the source of their information.
In 1-2 paragraphs, the student must:
1.
Name the sociolinguistic variable, and its linguistic variants.
2.
Indicate the level of the grammar in which it operates.
3.
Report on the status of scholarly research into that variable (who has
studied it? How has it been investigated? What is its
history?)
STRATEGIES
FOR SUCCESS
1. The most successful students in this course:
Course
Policies and Expectations:
Prerequisites: Students enrolled in this course must have taken LING200, LING400
(for linguistics majors) or equivalent (see instructor). It is also recommended
that students have taken LING450.
Disability Accommodation: It is my goal to ensure that our learning environment is
accessible to everyone. To request academic accommodations due to a disability, please contact Disabled Student Services, 448
Schmitz, 543-8924. If you have a
letter from DDS indicating that you have a disability that requires special
academic accommodations, please present the letter to me as soon as possible so
we can discuss what accommodations you might need.
Academic integrity: Students are expected to maintain the highest
standards of academic ethics, honesty and integrity. Academic misconduct
includes (but is not limited to) plagiarism, harassment, cheating, or
representing another personÕs work as your own and will not be tolerated. It is
your responsibility to read and understand the UniversityÕs expectations in
this regard (which you can find online at http://www.washington.edu/students/handbook/conduct.html). Any student found to be in violation of
proper academic conduct will be dealt with in the strictest manner in
accordance with University policy.
Email:
I will attempt to respond to email inquiries within 24 hours (excepting
weekends and holidays). Materials
to be emailed for in-class presentations MUST not be sent at the last-minute.
Allow 24 hours for me to review and respond to these emails.
Student responsibilities:
1.
If you
must miss a lecture or a section it is
your responsibility to obtain the information you missed.
2.
The tests
and assignment dates are not negotiable excepting for a university-sanctioned
absence. Please see the University
Handbook on excused absences.
Laptop computers and Cell phones:
1.
Laptop computers may be used in class only for note-taking. Laptops are only allowed in the last row
of the classroom. First-come; first
served. Bring a notebook in case
all seats are taken and you must sit elsewhere. Staying in the last row does not
ensure a student will get to keep using the laptop, however. If there is any
appearance that the student is using the laptop for something other than taking
notes on lecture, he or she will be asked to close the laptop and take written
notes. Googling on course topics is great; but this will be done during
mid-class break and not during lecture.
2.
A student
who is doing non-class related activities on his or her computer is not only
hurting his or her own education, but possibly the educational experience of
many others in the class: research has shown that a game or a picture on a
laptop distracts not only the student using the computer but also those
students nearby (Yamamoto 2007, Fried 2008). Therefore the use of laptops for
non-class activity (e.g. email, games, web-surfing) is prohibited. Students using their laptop for
non-class activity will be asked to turn off their laptop.
3.
Cell
phones are to stowed (not on the desk or table), and must be on vibrate. Checking
to see if someone texted you takes your attention away
from course content. It can wait till the mid-class break.
4.
Laptops
and cell phones aside, there are MANY other ways to be distracted in
class: reviewing flash cards for a
language class, notes for a quiz next period, knitting. There is zero tolerance for these in
class.
5.
Read
this:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/college-inc/2010/03/laptops_in_class_have_we_creat.html
Grading Policy
The following UW grading scale will be used:
Percent = Grade
³ 95% = 4.0 88 = 3.3 81 = 2.6 74 = 1.9 67 = 1.2
94 = 3.9 87 = 3.2 80 = 2.5
73 = 1.8 66 = 1.1
93 = 3.8 86 = 3.1 79 = 2.4 72 = 1.7 65 = 1.0
92 = 3.7 85 = 3.0 78 = 2.3 71 = 1.6 64 = .9
91 = 3.6 84 = 2.9
77 = 2.2 70 = 1.5
63 = .8
90 = 3.5 83 = 2.8
76 = 2.1 69 = 1.4 62 = .7
89 = 3.4 82 = 2.7 75 = 2.0 68 = 1.3 <.7 = failing
Note: It is university policy that I cannot discuss your grades over email. If you would like to talk about your grades, you are welcome to come to my office hours or see me after class.
Academic Integrity:
Students are expected to maintain the highest standards of academic ethics, honesty and integrity. Academic misconduct includes (but is not limited to) plagiarism, harassment, cheating, or representing another personÕs work as your own and will not be tolerated. It is your responsibility to read and understand the UniversityÕs expectations in this regard (which you can find online at:
http://www.washington.edu/students/handbook/conduct.html).
Any student found to be in violation of proper academic conduct will be dealt with in the strictest manner in accordance with University policy.
Reading Schedule
Readings are to be done by the date listed (so they may be discussed in that class).
[#] indicates the number of pages of required reading for a given day to help you plan your reading time.
|
Wk |
Day |
Topic |
Readings (All Sections) |
Student Work (432 and 532) |
Graduate Sections ONLY (532) |
|
1 |
T Jan 8 |
Introduction
and orientation, aims and scope. |
Chambers
1-11 [11] (to do after class, in this case) |
|
|
|
Th Jan 10 |
Sociolinguistics
and adjacent fields; language as emblematic |
Chambers
11-26, Coulmas 2001 [33] |
Handouts:
inductive
vs. deductive reasoning |
|
|
|
2 |
T Jan 15 |
Methods
and goals; the 'linguistic variable'; research questions; study of variation
and linguistic theory |
Chambers
26-38, Labov (1972c) ("Study of language in its social context,"
pgs. 283-298) [27] |
Sign up for TC presentations |
Sign up for article presentations |
|
Th Jan 17 |
Style and
Register Variation |
N.
Coupland 2001, Language, situation and the relational self Eckert
2004 The meaning of style |
|
|
|
|
3 |
T Jan 22 |
Speaker
variable I: social class |
Chambers
39-59 [20] |
Milestone 1 Due |
|
|
Th Jan 24 |
Social
class, cont. |
Labov
(1972b) ("Social stratification of (r)") [27] |
Homework 1 Due |
|
|
|
4 |
T Jan 29 |
Speaker
variable II: social network |
Chambers
74-115 [41] |
Quiz 1 |
|
|
Th Jan 31 |
Social
network, cont. |
Labov
(1972a) ("Linguistic consequencesÉ" pgs. 255-267) [12] |
|
|
|
|
5 |
T Feb 5 |
Social
network, cont. |
Milroy
& Milroy (1978) [18] |
Article
Presentation: Milroy & Milroy Milestone 2 Due |
|
|
Th Feb 7 |
Speaker
variable III: Gender, interactions
between independent variables |
Cheshire
(2004) [18] |
|
|
|
|
6 |
T Feb 12 |
Gender,
cont. |
Eckert
(1998) [11] |
Homework 2 Due |
|
|
Th Feb 14 |
Gender,
cont. |
|
|
Article
Presentation: Gal (1978) [15] |
|
|
7 |
T Feb 19 |
Speaker
variable IV: Age |
Llamas
(2007), Roberts (2004) [22] |
|
Article
Presentation: Sankoff & Blondeau (2007) [30] |
|
Th Feb 21 |
Speaker variable V: Geographic
mobility and dialect contact |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
T Feb 26 |
Geographic mobility, cont. |
Chambers 59-74, Tuten (2007) [21] |
|
Article Presentation: Payne (1980) [20] |
|
Th Feb 28 |
Geographic mobility, cont. |
|
Quiz 2 |
|
|
|
9 |
T Mar 5 |
Dialect variation and language
ideology: prescriptivism and language policy;
linguistic prestige; 'Standard' and 'Non-standard' varieties |
Preston
(1986) [34] Milroy (2007) [6], Bello (1847) [10] |
Article
Presentation Preston, Milestone 3 Due |
|
|
Th Mar 7 |
North
America's regional, ethnic, and social dialects |
Wolfram
& Schilling-Estes (1998) [31] |
|
Presentation:
Hazen et
al. (2011) [30] |
|
|
10 |
T Mar 12 |
Ethnicity: The case of African American
English (AAE) |
Wolfram
(1998a) (ÒLanguage Ideology and DialectÓ) [14], Smitherman (1998) [10] |
|
|
|
Th Mar 14 |
Ethnicity: Structure and origins of AAE; Ethnicity: Housing discrimination |
Rickford
& Rickford (2000) [32]; (optional:
Wolfram (1998b) ("Scrutinizing Linguistic Gratuity") [8]) |
Homework 3 due |
Article
Presentation: Purnell,
Idsardi, and Baugh (1999) [20] |
|
|
11 |
FRIDAY MAR 22 |
FINAL PAPERS (Milestone 4) DUE in Canvas on Friday,
March 22, 2012, 4:20 pm |
|
||
Full
References for Readings:
Bell, A.
(1984)
Language style as audience design. In Coupland, N. and A. Jaworski (1997, eds.) Sociolinguistics: a reader and coursebook, pp.
240-50. New York: St. MartinÕs Press Inc.
Bell, A.
(2007)
Style and the linguistic repertoire. In Llamas, Carmen, Mullany, Louise, and
Stockwell, Peter (eds.) The Routledge
Companion to Sociolinguistics, pp. 95-100. London: Routledge.
Bello, A.
(1847) Prologue: Grammar of the Spanish Language. In L—pez-Morillas, F.M. (1997, ed.) Selected
writings of AndrŽs Bello.
London: Oxford University
Press.
Chambers, J.K. (2002) Sociolinguistic Theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Cheshire, Jenny. (2004) Sex and Gender in Variationist
Research. In Chambers, J.K., Trudgill, Peter, and Schilling-Estes,
Natalie (eds.) The Handbook of Language
Variation and Change, pp. 423-443.
Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Coulmas, Florian. (2001) Sociolinguistics. In Aronoff, Mark and Rees-Miller, Janie
(eds.) The Handbook of Linguistics,
pp. 563-581. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Coupland, N. (2001) Language, situation and
the relational self: theorizing dialect-style in sociolinguistics. In P. Eckert and J. Rickford (eds) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press. pp. 185-210.
Eckert, Penelope. (2004.) The meaning of style. in Wai-Fong Chiang, Elaine Chun, Laura
Mahalingappa, Siri Mehus eds. Salsa 11. Texas Linguistics Forum.
47
Eckert, P. (1998) Gender and sociolinguistic
variation. In Coates, J. (ed.) Language and Gender: a reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, pp. 64-75.
Fasold, R. (1993) Address Forms, The sociolinguistics of language, ch 1. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, pp. 1-38.
Gal, S.
(1978) Peasant men canÕt get
wives: language change and sex
roles in a bilingual community, Language
in Society, 7(1), pp. 1-16.
Hazen, K., Hamilton, S. and Vacovsky, S.
(2011) The fall of demonstrative them:
evidence from Appalachia. English
World-Wide 32:1, pp. 74-103.
Labov, W.
(1972a)
The linguistic consequences of being a lame, Language in the inner city, ch. 7. Philadelphia: U Pennsylvania, pp. 255-292.
Labov, W.
(1972b) The social stratification of (r) in New York
City department stores. In Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: U Pennsylvania, pp. 43-69.
Labov, W.
(1972c) The study of language in its social context. In Giglioli, P.P.
(ed.) Language and Social Context. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 283-98.
Llamas, Carmen. (2007) Age. In Llamas, Carmen, Mullany, Louise, and
Stockwell, Peter (eds.) The Routledge
Companion to Sociolinguistics, pp. 69-76. London: Routledge.
Milroy, James. (2007) The ideology of the standard
language. In Llamas, Carmen,
Mullany, Louise, and Stockwell, Peter (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Sociolinguistics,
pp. 133-139. London: Routledge.
Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. (1978) Belfast: Change and variation in an urban
vernacular. In P. Trudgill, (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 19-36.
Payne, Arvilla C. (1980) Factors controlling
the acquisition of the Philadelphia dialect by out-of-state children. In Labov,
W. Locating Language in Time and Space. New
York: Academic Press
Preston, D.R. (1986) Five visions of America. Language
in Society, 15(2), pp. 221-240.
Purnell, T., Idsardi, W.,
and Baugh, J. (1999) Perceptual and phonetic
experiments on American English dialect identification, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(1), pp. 10-30.
Rickford, J.R. and Rickford, R.J. (2000) History. Spoken Soul: the story of
Black English. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 129-160.
Roberts, Julie. (2004) Child language variation. In Chambers, J.K., Trudgill, Peter, and
Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.) The
Handbook of Language Variation and Change, pp.
333-348. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Sankoff, Gillian & Blondeau, HŽlene
(2007). Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language
83:3, pp. 560-588.
Smitherman, G. (1998) Ebonics, King, and Oakland: Some folk donÕt believe fat meat is
greasy, Journal of English Linguistics,
26(2), pp. 97-107.
Tuten, Donald N. (2007) Koineization. In Llamas, Carmen, Mullany, Louise, and
Stockwell, Peter (eds.) The Routledge
Companion to Sociolinguistics, pp. 185-191. London: Routledge.
Wolfram, W.
(1998a) Language ideology
and dialect: understanding the
Ebonics controversy. Journal of English Linguistics, 26(2),
pp. 108-121.
Wolfram, W.
(1998b) Scrutinizing
linguistic gratuity: issues from
the field, Journal of Sociolinguistics,
2(2), pp. 271-279.
Wolfram, W., and
Schilling-Estes, N. (1998) American English, ch. 4. Dialects in the US: past, present, and future. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, pp. 90-123.