LING 535:

Advanced Sociolinguistics

 

 

 

Instructor:         Alicia Beckford Wassink                                        Rm:     Art 003

Office:                Padelford A217                                                       Time:  T,Th 10:30-12:20

Office Hours:    Tu 1:00-2:00 and by appointment

Office Phone:    616-9589

Dept. Phone:     543-2046 (Dept. of Linguistics Office)

Email:                wassink@u.washington.edu

Webpage:           http://faculty.washington.edu/~wassink

 

 

Course Description:

This course provides advanced coursework in sociolinguistics, particularly sociolinguistic scholarship in to historical language change.  We build familiarity with sociolinguistic perspectives on language change and its mechanisms, which relate language change to the social context of language use in the speech community.  We focus primarily on the identification and study of changes in progress, chain shifts and mergers.  Both language-internal and language-external (social) factors prompting language change are examined.  Readings center around the development of sociolinguistic theoretization into language change, begun by Weinreich, Labov and Herzog in the 1960s.  This course is the final course in the sociolinguistics graduate sequence, but is complemented by LING580C: Change across the lifespan seminar, also being taught this quarter.

 

Prerequisites: 

LING 200 or 400 (Introduction to Linguistics) or equivalent (e.g., ENGL 370), LING 4/532 (Sociolinguistics I), or instructor's permission.

Recommended prerequisites: LING 4/534 (Socio II), LING 453 (Experimental Phonetics).

 

Learning goals:

By the end of the quarter, students will be able to:

1.  Define and discuss key terms in sociolinguistic investigations of language change, including: changes in progress, panel studies, trend studies, apparent time hypothesis, the 3 Labovian principles of chain shifts, the Great Vowel Shift

2.  Name the historic word classes used by sociolinguists and the recognize the importance of using word classes when representing diachronic variation (vs. synchronic representations accomplished using phonetic transcription)

3.  Use LabovÕs Plotnik software for representing phonetic data by word class groupings for a small sampling of data investigating a change in progress

 

 

 

 

 

 

Required work:

1.)  25%--  Laboratory assignment. Investigation of studentÕs own (non)participation in a merger in North American English.  Non-native-English speaking students will work with data from a classmate.

 

2.) 35%-- Reading responses. Show comprehension of and respond critically to course readings. These will generally be turned in every week.

 

3.) 40%-- Final paper.  There are two options for this portion of the course grade: Due at the beginning of the final examination period for this course: 10:30am, Monday, Jun. 8, 2009

 

a.     Option I:  A final term paper examining the progress to date of a well-described change in progress (10-15 pages, single-spaced).  Paper must consider the history of the change, as well as alternative accounts of the ordering and causality of change.

b.     Option II:  Students will be responsible for plotting some data (original or archival) from American English that relate to a change in progress, using Plotnik, and writing up the results. (10-15 pages, single-spaced).

 

Required Readings:

1.)  (required purchase) Labov, William (1994)  Principles of Linguistic Change:  volume 1, internal factors.  Oxford: Blackwell.

2.)  Readings on electronic reserve (does not include optional readings)

3.)  (accessed in sociolinguistics laboratory) Labov, William, Ash, Sherri, and Boberg, Charles (2006). The Atlas of North American English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. The Northern Cities, ch. 14 and The southern shift, ch. 18.

 

 

COURSE POLICIES

Disability accommodation: It is my goal to insure that our learning environment is accessible to everyone. If you have a learning or other disability that requires accommodation, please contact me or Disabled Student Services in order to make suitable arrangements (448 Schmitz, 543-8924 (V), 543-8925 (TTY), uwdss@u.washington.edu.

 

Academic integrity: Students are expected to maintain the highest standards of academic ethics, honesty and integrity. Academic misconduct includes (but is not limited to) plagiarism, harassment, cheating, or representing another personÕs work as your own and will not be tolerated. It is your responsibility to read and understand the UniversityÕs expectations in this regard (which you can find online at http://www.washington.edu/students/handbook/conduct.html). Any student found to be in violation of proper academic conduct will be dealt with in the strictest manner in accordance with University policy. 

 

Email: I will attempt to respond to email inquiries within 24 hours (excepting weekends and holidays).

 


Student responsibilities:

1.     If you must miss a lecture or a section it is your responsibility to obtain the information you missed. 

2.     The tests and assignment dates are not negotiable excepting for a university-sanctioned absence.  Please see the University Handbook on excused absences. 

 

Laptop computers:

1.  Laptop computers may be used in class only for note-taking.

2.     A student who is doing non-class related activities on his or her computer is not only hurting his or her own education, but possibly the educational experience of many others in the class: research has shown that a game or a picture on a laptop distracts not only the student using the computer but also those students nearby (Yamamoto 2007, Fried 2008).  Therefore the use of laptops for non-class activity (e.g. email, games, web-surfing) is prohibited.  Students using their laptop for non-class activity will be asked to turn off their laptop.

 

STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS

1. The most successful students in this course:

á       Attend every class meeting

á       Prepare readings and questions in advance of lectures

á       Expand on their learning by participating in class discussions

á       Prepare writing assignments thoughtfully and include connections made to prior knowledge, connections to other texts, other content areas, etc.

á       Form study groups to enhance their learning


 

SYLLABUS

note: required readings are listed using the following abbreviation conventions: readings from the main text begin with an ÒLÓ followed by chapter no. and page(s), e.g., [L1p4-5] represents ch 1, pages 4-5. Single-authored works are listed by last initial and chapter, e.g., [McM2] or full last name [Martinet]. Coauthored works are referenced by initials, e.g., [LKM] for Labov, Karen and Miller.

 

Topics and readings: 

Week 1      Tu March 31

¯  Characterization of sound changes: completed vs. in progress

¯  The importance of changes in progress to sociolinguistic theory

¯  Internal factors vs. external factors: grounds for divorce? [L1p2-3]

¯  LabovÕs conceptualization of ÒtheoryÓ [L1p4-5]

¯  How does this research program connect to historical linguistics? The actuation and transmission problems in historical linguistics [McM1]

                  assignment: read [Lpx-xii] ÒNotational ConventionsÓ, [WLH]

 

                  In your notes, for discussion next class: define the Òembedding problem and the evaluation problem.Ó In particular, what are the two parts of the Òembedding problemÓ? [WLH]

 

                  Th April 2

¯  Empirical foundations of a theory of change in progress [WLH]

¯  Historic word classes and LabovÕs symbol correspondences

¯  Identify major patterns in present-day English with respect to change in progress in these classes

¯  reading response assigned

                  assignment: read [L1], reading response

 

Week 2      Tu April 7

¯  Use of the present to explain the past [L1]

¯  Ch 1 Reading response due

¯  Ch 2,3 Reading response assigned

                  assignment: read [L2,3], reading response

                 

                  Th April 9

¯  Observations in Apparent Time [L2,3]

¯  Types of real-time study

¯  The Apparent Time hypothesis

¯  Ch 2,3 reading response due

                  assignment: read [L4], [Martinet]

 

Week 3      Tu April 14

¯  Observations in Real and Apparent Time, cont. [L4]

¯  Age-stratification vs. age-grading

¯  Functional explanations of sound change [Martinet]

¯  Ch 5 Reading response assigned

                  assignment: read [L5], reading response

 

 

 

                  Th April 16

¯  General principles: chain shifting [L5]

¯  minimal and extended chain shifts; push and drag chains

¯  Ch 5 Reading response due

                  assignment: read [L6,7]

                 

Week 4      Tu April 21

¯  General principles: chain shifting II [L6,7]

¯  The Great Vowel Shift

¯  Gordon Reading response assigned

                  assignment: read [Gordon], [ANAE14], Gordon reading response

 

                  Th April 23

¯  Chain Shifts: The Northern Cities Shift [ANAE14]

¯  Directionality and causality of the NCS in question [Gordon]

¯  Gordon reading response due

                  assignment: read [ANAE18]

 

Week 5      Tu April 28

¯  The Southern Shift [ANAE18]

¯  No reading response assigned

                  assignment: read [M&H]

 

                  Th April 30

¯  The Meat/Mate Merger [M&H]

¯  The diachronic advancement of dialect differentiation

                  assignment: read [L9]

 

Week 6      Tu May 5

¯  Phonemic Splits, Chain Shifts across Subsystems [L9]

¯  Peripherality and phonetic evidence for subsystems in perception

¯  Ch 10,11 reading response assigned

                  assignment: read [L10, 11], reading response

 

                  Th May 7

¯  Some Impossible Unmergings and General Properties of Mergers and Splits [L10,11]

¯  Ch 10,11 reading response due

                  assignment: read [L12], review Plotnik manual

 

Week 7      Tu May 12        ****MEET IN THE SOCIOLINGUISTICS LABORATORY****

¯  Studying the suspension of phonemic contrast [L12]

¯  Plotnik tutorial

¯  Studying the rhotic word classes

¯  Laboratory assignment given out and explained

                  assignment: read [L13], begin Laboratory assignment

 

 

                  Th May 14

¯  Explanation of Unmergings [L13]

                  assignment: read [LKM], [L14]. Note: much of [L14] is redundant with LKM, which is the original research article from which this chapter was written. Continue working on laboratory assignment.

 

Week 8      Tu May 19

¯  Near-mergers and the suspension of phonemic contrast [LKM, L14]

¯  Testing near mergers: the commutation and Coach tests

                  assignment: read [McM2], continue working on Laboratory assignment

 

                  Th May 21

¯  Structuralist, Neogrammarian and Generative views on sound change [McM2]

¯  The Regularity Hypothesis

¯  Laboratory assignment due

                  assignment: read [McM3]

 

Week 9      Tu May 26

¯  Structuralist, Neogrammarian and Generative views on sound change [McM3]

¯  Lexical phonology and sound change

¯  Term paper abstracts discussed

assignment: read [L15,L16p451-454], prepare term paper abstracts

 

                  Th May 28

¯  Regularity and the Neogrammarian Controversy [L15, 16p451-454]

¯  Lexical diffusion in the speech community

¯  Term paper abstracts due

assignment: read [L17]

 

Week 10    Tu June 2  

¯  Regular Sound Change and Regional Dialect Variation [L17]

¯  The lexical diffusionist account of the GVS

assignment: read [L18]

 

                  Th June 4

¯  Proposed Resolution to the Regularity question [L18]

¯  Complete course evaluations

 

 

 


Required readings (not including those in the required Labov text):

Unless otherwise noted, readings are to be found on electronic reserve. Each reading is preceded by the abbreviation used to represent it in the syllabus, above.

à not in UW library system, but owned by Sociolinguistics Laboratory, Padelford B5GH

 

 

à [ANAE] Labov, William, Ash, Sherri, and Boberg, Charles (2006). The Atlas of North American English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. The Northern Cities, ch. 14 and The southern shift, ch. 18.

 

[Gordon]  Gordon, Matthew (2005) ÒNew York, Philadelphia, and other northern cities.Ó In, Handbook of Varieties of English: The Americas and Caribbean, Vol. 1, Phonology (E. Schneider, ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp 282-299.

 

[LKM]  Labov, William, Karen, Mark, and Miller, Corey (1991) ÒNear-mergers and the suspension of phonemic contrastÓ, Language Variation and Change (3)1, pp33-74.

 

[Martinet]  Martinet, AndrŽ (1952)  Function, structure and sound change.  Word 8:1-32.

 

[McM]  McMahon, April (1999) Understanding Language Change.  Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

 

[M&H]  Milroy, James, and John Harris (1980) When is a merger not a merger?  The MEAT/MATE problem in a present-day English vernacular.  English World-Wide, 1:199-210.

 

[WLH] Weinreich, U., Labov, W., and Herzog, M. (1968) Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Directions for historical linguistics; a symposium (W. P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel, eds.). Austin, University of Texas Press. pp. 95-188.

 

 

Plotnik

The Plotnik manual is bundled with downloaded software.  You may download the software yourself, or access it from the sociolinguistics laboratory computers.

Description of software         http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~wlabov/Plotnik.html

 

 

Further Reading:

Evans, Betsy, Ito, Rika, Jones, Jamilla & Preston, Dennis R. (2000). ÒChange on Top of Change: Social and Regional Accommodation to the Northern Cities Vowel Shift.Ó De Toekomst van de Variatielinguistiek (a special issue of Taan en Tongval to honor Dr. Jo Daan on her ninetieth birthday), ed. by H. Bennis, H. Ryckeboer, and Jan Stroop, pp61-86.

 

Gordon, Matthew J. (2001) Small-Town Values and Big-City Vowels: a study of the Northern Cities Shift in Michigan.  Durham, NC: Duke U Press.

 

Labov, William, Malcah Yeager and Richard Steiner (1972) A Quantitative Study of Sound Change in Progress.  Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.

 

Ohala, J.  J. (1980) The Listener as a source of sound change.  Working Papers of the Chicago Linguistic Society.

 

Stockwell, Robert P. (1972) Problems in the interpretation of the Great Vowel Shift.  In Studies in Linguistics in Honor of George L. Trager, M. E. Smith (ed.),  The Hague:  Mouton, 344-62.

 

Toon, Thomas E. (1978)  Lexical Diffusion in Old English.  In Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 357-64.

 

----- (1983) The Politics of Early Old English Sound Change.  New York: Academic Press.

 

Trudgill, Peter and Tzvaras, G. A. (1975) Why Albanian-Greeks are not Albanians:  Language shift in Attica and Biotia.  In Language, Ethnicity, and Intergroup Relations (H. Giles, ed.) European Monographs in Social Psychology 13, New York: Academic.

 

Wang, William S.-Y. (1979) Language Change: A lexical perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology, 8:353-71.

 

 

Rubric for Grading Reading Responses

Exceeds

 

45-50 points

 

 

 

In addition to all ÒMeetsÓ criteria, the response also contains

  • Connections made to prior knowledge, connections to other texts, other content areas, current events, etc.

 

Meets

 

40-44.5 points

 

 

 

  • All aspects of the question addressed (for multiple part questions)
  • Response is appropriate, (either answers the question or  response matches the prompt i.e. gives a prediction, poses a question, makes a response)
  • Response shows understanding and insight of the text.
  • Response is supported by evidence: references to the text, details, quotes from the text.

 

Approaches

 

35-39.5 points

 

 

  • Response meets some of the ÒMeetsÓ criteria but not all

Not yet

 

0-34.5 points

 

 

  • Response does not meet any of the ÒMeetsÓ criteria
  • Work may be resubmitted for max score of ÒMeetsÓ