LING534
Sociolinguistic
applications of social network theory
Handbook Guidelines
General
suggestions (for all authors):
1. Formatting:
--
for consistency, I suggest we commonly title our sections as follows, for
example:
"Chapter
1: The Origins of Social Network Theory and Modeling
(author)"
--
use 0, 1, 1.1, 1.1.1 etc. for numbering subheadings
--
Section 0 should be titled "Introduction" for everyone
2. Within your chapter, use section
headings to highlight the organization of your chapter.
3. Collect endmatter into endnotes (not
footnotes)
4. Citations and References section
should follow APA style
Specific
suggestions:
For those of you who do chapters
focused on studies of particular speech communities, it would be good to follow
a common organizational strategy in writing your handbook chapter, and use
section headings constructed in parallel. We can decide this to some extent as
a class. Here are some ideas to get us started:
1. Introduction
State the purpose of your chapter, set
out the type of research you will survey, and the organization of your chapter.
2. possible subhead: "The social
networks of <type of community here> speakers"
* Provide a description of the type of
social network study(ies) examined in the works you read, for example:
--immigrant
community in a host language setting (bilingual)
--immigrant
community in a host language setting (monolingual with phonological
restructuring)
--established
speech community where language is undergoing change
--inter-ethnic
contact between two communities
--etc.
3. possible subhead: "Applications
of network analysis techniques"
* What methods of social network
analysis did the author(s) use? (e.g., journaling, participant-observation?)
* What kinds of network structures were
examined? What did they quantify (e.g., whole networks? strong and weak ties?
density? multiplexity?)
* Did authors use a network strength
scale of some kind? How was it constructed?
Is there a way that she could have more
fully or fruitfully made use of network
methods in conducting this study?
* What kinds of linguistic variables
were explored for correlations to network strength?
3. possible subhead: "Social
network-theoretic findings"
* Were there any hypotheses formulated
and tested by the author(s) that were grounded in the predictions made by
social network theory? Could the
author(s) have more fully explored the predictions made by the theory itself?
4. possible summary subhead:
"Contributions to the sociolinguistic study of social networks"
* What "new" space did this
study/these studies map out within variationist sociolinguistics? What were
its(their) major contributions?
Question:
Do we want to include an appendix on
software for calculating and visualizing networks?
Do we want to include graphics?