Motivation and Emotional/Behavioral Disorders

 

Marcia Jensen

Abstract

Students with emotional/behavioral disorders (EBD) experience disproportionately high rates of poor school outcomes.  These dismal outcomes may be explained by low levels of achievement motivation.  The purpose of this review is to examine the achievement motivation problems specific to serving students with EBD and to propose solutions based on self-determination theory (SDT).  This review of published literature includes a description of SDT, comparisons of students with learning disabilities and EBD and their perceptions of motivational factors, a discussion of instructional methods for math and language arts, and a review of classroom management strategies indicated by SDT.  Students with EBD tend to have more experiences of failure with appropriate self-regulation and autonomy.  Hence, educational environments for this population should include high levels of teacher praise for self-regulation and supports for autonomy.

 

 

References

 

Deci, E.L., Hodges, R., Pierson, L., & Tomassone, J. (1992).  Autonomy and competence as motivational factors in students with learning disabilities and emotional handicaps.  Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(7), 457-471.

 

Dishion, T.J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999).  When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior.  American Psychologist, 54(9), 755-764.

 

Edwards, L., & Chard, D.J. (2000).  Curriculum reform in a residential treatment program: Establishing high academic expectations for students with emotional and behavioral disorders.  Behavioral Disorders, 25(3), 259-263.

 

Fulk, B.M., Brigham, F.J., & Lohman, D.A. (1998).  Motivation and self-regulation: A comparison of students with learning and behavior problems.  Remedial and Special Education, 19(5), 300-309.

 

Koestner, R., Ryan, R.M., Bernieri, F., & Holt, K. (1984).  Setting limits on children’s behavior: The differential effects of controlling vs. informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity.  Journal of Personality, 52(3), 233-248.

 

Rigby, C.S., Deci, E.L., Patrick, B.C., & Ryan, R.M. (1992).  Beyond the intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning.  Motivation and Emotion, 16(3), 165-185.

 

Ryan, R.M., & Connell, J.P. (1989).  Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749-761.

 

Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000).  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.  American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

 

Sutherland, K.S., Wehby, J.H., & Yoder, P.J. (2002).  Examination of the relationship between teacher praise and opportunities for students with EBD to respond to academic requests.  Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10(1), 5-13.

 

Turner, J.C., Cox, K.E., DiCintio, M., Meyer, D.K., Logan, C., & Thomas, C.T. (1998).  Creating contexts for involvement in mathematics.  Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 730-745.

 

U.S. Department of Education. (2002).  Twenty-fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.  Washington, DC: Author.

 

Witzel, B.S., & Mercer, C.D. (2003).  Using rewards to teach students with disabilities: Implications for motivation.  Remedial and Special Education, 24(2), 88-96.