Welcome to John Sidles's home page.
I am a medical researcher and quantum systems engineer,
whose research interests focus upon quantum spin microscopy in
service of regenerative medicine.
The primary objective of my research is SHOW: the Synthesis for
Healing Our Warriors, and SHOW is the focus of our
UW/ISH Intent and Guidance Seminar for 2012.

A one-page math syllabus of the 2012 I&G Seminar is viewable here. By design, this syllabus focuses upon aspects of modern mathematical naturality that encompass and unify a broad swathe of STEM enterprises, focusing in particular upon the mathemtically natural elements of separatory transport (NEST).
The mathematical formalism of the 2012 NEST I&G Seminar will be geometric throughout, in fairly strict accord with the mathematical notation of Jack Lee's Introduction to Smooth Manifolds (2003), and encompassing the spin physics of Charles Slichter's Principles of Magnetic Resonance (1990), the quantum informatics of Michael Nielsen and Isaac Chuang's Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (2001), the quantum physics of Abhay Ashtekar and Troy Schilling's Geometrical formulation of quantum mechanics (1997), the geometric thermodynamics of John Krommes and Genze Hu's General theory of Onsager symmetries (1993) and George Ruppeiner's Riemannian geometry in thermodynamic fluctuation theory (1995), implemented within the practical computational framework of Daan Frenkel and Berend Smit's Understanding Molecular Simulation: from Algorithms to Applications, and applied within a reconsideration and extension of the survey by Bob Griffin and coauthors Dynamic nuclear polarization at high magnetic fields (2008).
The broad focus of the 2012 NEST I&G Seminar will accord with the enterprise-centric viewpoint of Calvin Gidding's textbook Unified Separation Science, as updated in light of the above-mentioned advances in geometric classical dynamics, geometric quantum mechanics, and geometric thermodynamics, and then as applied to clinical opportunities in dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) and in hyperpolarized medical imaging generally.
The envisioned resolution of the 2012 NEST I&G Seminar is sustainment of the historical doubling cadence of magnetic resonance sensitivity in service of the SHOW enterprise, by an operational strategy of speeding the pace, retiring the risks, focusing the capabilities, and uniting the efforts, of the individual enterprises that are associated to SHOW.
An historical aside: Colleagues for whom the history of the STEM enterprise is substantially the history of geometric ideas and methods are referred to Joshiah Willard Gibbs' article A method of geometrical representation of the thermodynamic properties of substances by means of surfaces (1873), which anticipates many of the key physical ideas and geometric mathematical methods of the seminar.
Q: Synthesis for Healing
Our Warriors
(SHOW)! What's that?
A: SHOW is an
enterprise whose primary objective is the healing and
restoration
to
ordinary daily life of wounded warriors. DNP-ST is an enabling capability
for SHOW
that, by imaging healing processes at atomic resolution, serves
to
speed
the pace, retire the risks, and focus the strategy of achieving
the directed
regenerative healing of even the most severe and intractable
battle wounds.
Speeding the pace, retiring the risks, increasing the
capabilities, and focusing
SHOW's
strategy has been the primary motive for developing DNP-ST;
this website
documents the resulting (and accelerating) progress toward
SHOW's main objective:
the
healing and restoration to daily life of wounded warriors.


SHOW
can be appreciated as an accelerated realization of the
NIH
Roadmap
along
the imaging-centric lines of Elias
Zerhouni's 2007 Pendergrass Lecture,
as
augmented by transformational new capabilities in observational
epigenomics
that are
being enabled by the advances in DNP-ST reported here.
New for July 29,
2011
The meeting Black Forest Focus on Soft Matter 6: Magnetic
Resonance at the Microscale is finished, and it was
terrific!
Our UW QSE Group's presentation was titled. Transport Mechanisms for Inducing Dynamic Nuclear Polarization in Magnetic Resonance Microsystems: Dynamical Theory, Design Rules, and Experimental Protocols. The gist of it follow …
On average, magnetic resonance channel capacity has doubled every year for 65 years.
Q: Can this
doubling pace be sustained?
A: Yes, via
Dynamically Natural (hyper)
Polarization
by (quantum) Separative
Transport (DNP-ST).
We've been experimenting with various names and acronyms for this new mechanism for hyperpolarization and it looks like the final choice will be Dynamically Natural (hyper) Polarization by (quantum) Separative Transport (DNP-ST) (and version 1.3 of the slides now reflects this convention)
Q: What topics are
covered?
A: (1) Objectives and
metrics for progress in quantum spin imaging and
spectroscopy,
(2) Technical
means for progress (from math, science, and engineering),
and
(3)
Global-scale enterprises arising from continued progress.
Q: What are the key objectives and technical
metrics of this research?
A: The key objective is to
sustain the historical cadence of advancement,
that is,
the yearly doubling
since 1946 of magnetic resonance sensitivity.
The key
metric is the achieved Shannon channel capacity (per the
lecture).
Q: Dynamically
Natural (hyper) Polarization
by (quantum) Separative
Transport
(DNP-ST)! What's that?
A:
Dynamically Natural
Polarization-exchange interactions (in
leading order) create
nuclear
hyperpolarization by Separatively
Transporting up-spins & down-spins.
DNP-ST
is stronger, faster, and more power-efficient than traditional
DNP,
because
the older method is based upon non-leading transfer
dynamics,
as
contrasted with DNP-ST's leading-order separative
transport.
Q: Separative Transport
(ST)! What's that?
A: Separative
transport is a key enterprise technology that “just
works”
in
concentrating and purifing quantities such as (clockwise from
top) quantum
states
of laser gain media (as required for laser output), coherence
in quantum
cryptography, chemical and petroleum feedstocks, desalinated
water, photoelectric
and
thermoelectric power, nuclear isotopes, and cell nutrients and
electrolytes.
Microscopic details vary greatly among these processes, yet
fundamentally
they all
are alike in that (1) the dynamics is constrained by
conservation laws
(for
example, conservation of energy, chemical species, charge, or
polarization),
(2) an
entropy gradient is externally induced (via heat, sunlight,
electric current,
chemical
potential, or magnetic fields), and (3) the entropy gradient
induces
coupled
dynamical flows (for example, flows of 235U and
238U, thermal energy
and
electric current, quantum correlations, sodium ions and
glucose, quanta
in
pumped laser gain media, dissolved salts in seawater, and
chemical products
undergoing distillation) that all accomplish valuable
separative purposes
(like
sustained light-amplifying population inversions in laser gain
media).
The importance of these separative
purposes, and the richness of their physics,
is the
reason why — for more than a century —
the science and engineering
of
separative transport processes has been among the most lively,
dramatic,
strategically vital, and entrepreneurially job-creating, of all
STEM disciplines.
Q: Natural mathematics! What's
that?
A: Ideas that don't
depend upon arbitrary conventions (like coordinates) are
said
to be
mathematically natural. DNP-ST is born of the union of
natural dynamics
(both
classical and quantum) with First and Second Laws of
thermodynamics
(with is
the foundation of the modern theory of separative
transport).
The
natural mathematical foundations of transport theory arise in
geometry,
and thus
can be challenging to grasp:
Developing one's own natural appreciation of mathematics and
dynamics
is quite
a lot of work, yet well-worth the effort (as Hermione
knows):
The
mathematical “magic” that Hermione is painstakingly
teaching to Ron and Harry
is
discussed below. Yes, you have to
“mean it to learn it”.
Q: What is DNP-ST good
for?
A: In spin
biomicroscopy, DNP-ST boosts signal strength and reduces
noise;
this key
capability sustains the sensitivity-doubling cadence.
Q: Dirac's separative value function!
What's that?
A: Dirac's
separative value function is a well-known
and and
mathematically simple
measure
of the work accomplished in isotope
separation. It provides the
starting-point of Dirac's theory of optimized
separative transport cascades,
which
are cascades that maximize the value function's
rate-of-increase.
DNP-ST
is the first nuclear-spin hyperpolarization method that is
naturally
compatible with Dirac's theory (in particular, the slide below
derives Dirac's
function
as the thermodynamically natural work accomplished in
DNP-ST).
Physically speaking, DNP-ST separates up- from
down-polarization
by
processes that are physically analogous and mathematically
isomorphic
to
separating
12C from 13C (or U235 from
U238) by gas
centrifuge cascades.
In
strategic terms, the isotope separation technologies of the
20th century
provided
concentrated sources of energy; now in the 21st
century,
DNP-ST
technologies provide concentrated sources of Shannon
channel capacity.
For both
isotope separation and DNP-ST the concentration ratio (of
specific
energy /
channel
capacity) is of order 105 to 107,
such that both technologies
transformationally augment 20-21st century STEM enterprise
capabilities.
Q: Shannon
capacity! What's that?
A: Shannon capacity
is the number of bits-per-second of information
that a
sample can transmit to an observer (it is easy to
calculate).
Q: How far can we push magnetic resonance imaging and
spectroscopy?
A: Thanks to new
methods for distilling spin coherence (DNP-ST in
particular),
there is
quantum headroom for ~27 more yearly doublings of channel
capacity.
Q: What are some
consequences of sustainment via spin hyperpolarization?
A: Comprehensive
surveys of epigenetic structural dynamics.
New for July 22, 2011 For an overvew of our math, science, engineering, and medical objectives, see our answer posted on MathOverflow to Gil Kalai's question "What is a book you would like to write?"
The image below is a link to the the first page of a (reasonably non-technical) 3-page PDF summary of my present research interests. These interests are presently focused upon the experimental demonstration of transport-driven nuclear spin hyperpolarization, for purposes of amplifying signal strength and reducing noise levels in quantum spin biomicroscopy.
For details, read on.

For a (relatively) non-technical overview of this work, see our PNAS Commentary Spin microscopy's heritage, achievements, and prospects
Synopsis: Chapter 4 is the sequel to Chapter 3: Magnetic Dipolar Broadening and Transport Dynamics of Rigid Lattices that we presented at Asilomar (as described below).
In essence, Chapter 4 describes how to turn these ideas into hardware that is useful (among other purposes) for transformationally accelerating the pace of research in regenerative medicine.
Here is our UW Quantum Systems Engineering (QSE) Group's poster "Quantum Spin Microscopy's Emerging Methods, Roadmaps, and Enterprises", as presented at the 52nd ENC, Asilomar, CA.

Our ENC poster is an imagined 21st century edition of Charlie Slichter's celebrated textbook Principles of Magnetic Resonance (1963), specifically an extended version of Slichter's Chapter 3 "Magnetic Dipolar Broadening of Rigid Lattices".
We color-coded the text of our imagined 21st century edition as follows:
We did have one very special visitor ...
... who was Charlie Slichter himself!
Building on the well-validated dipolar spin physics of Slichter's original text, three new topics are introduced:
The green box (below) states a key theorem. To assist non-specialists, the definitions associated to the theorem are stated in detail; thus the theorem can be read in two ways:
Option A Readers familiar with standard definitions in geometric dynamics can skip directly to the statement of the theorem.
Option B Readers familiar with vector-space quantum mechanics formalisms, but not geometric dynamical formalisms, can parse the definitions incrementally, as (effectively) encompassing the main dynamical elements of Nielsen and Chuang's Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (2000) in the mathematical language of four classic texts:
Here is a key theorem that draws upon the above "Yellow Book" math to obtain a result that is useful in large-scale spin simulations. To assist students (especially), mathematical elements associated to the Hilbert state-space appear in blue, while elements associated to the simulation state-space appear in red:
Pulled-back state-spaces are varieties Viewed as an algebraic variety, Kr belongs to the class of r'th secant varieties of n-factor Segre varieties; the many practical applications of this class of varieties are reviewed in Joseph Landsberg's Geometry and the complexity of matrix multiplication (2008).
Algebraic geometers call the simulation state-space Kr a variety (rather than a manifold) because dim Kr is non-constant in consequence of singular points at which the dimensionality of Kr drops and the Riemann curvature of K diverges; in consequence of these singularities Kr (formally speaking) is not a manifold, but rather has a more subtle geometric structure associated to the singularities.
Hilbert space is itself a ruled join As it happens, some joins are singularity-free; Hilbert space itself can be regarded as a linear join of exponentially many trivial (degree zero) algebraic varieties (one variety for each Hilbert space basis vector). From this catholic point of view, the n-particle Hilbert join Hn and the rank-r Kronecker join Kr both are projective algebraic varieties, both are members of a natural stratification of quantum state-spaces (as set forth in the definitions that are associated to quantum pullback theorem given above), and so the natural question "Does Hn pullback onto Kr or does Kr pullback onto Hn?" has the well-posed answer "yes" in both directions.
Pullback is robust A key feature of the quantum pullback theorem is that it holds at all points of Kr (including the singular points). The practical consequence is that as dynamical trajectories approach and pass through the singular points of Kr, simulation codes ``just keep running''... and yield sensible physical predictions that respect symmetries and conservation laws.
Quantum-to-classical transitions are smooth Physically the quantum pullback theorem ensures that quantum-to-classical transitions (and their associated reduction of state-space dimensionality) are dynamically smooth.
The ubiquitous Kronecker product A broader venue for appreciating the quantum pullback theorem is provided by Charles van Loan's terrific article "The ubiquitous Kronecker product". The figure below is van Loan's listing of the (many) natural algebraic properties that the Kronecker product possesses:
The quantum pullback theorem can be regarded as the algebraically natural extension of van Loan's list of natural Kronecker properties to the domain of quantum dynamical potentials and differential forms.
The present poster PDF files are Version 2.5 (April 15, 2011); and they include three extra pages of material relative to the original paper poster.
Here are three audio files:
The Slichter lecture was accompanied by these slides (apologies are extended for their marginal photographic quality):
Further material is presented in Prof. Slichter's recent Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics article "The discovery and demonstration of dynamic nuclear polarization: a personal and historical account"