HIST 491 HONORS HISTORICAL METHODS

Professor Nikhil Pal Singh

Smith 103G

Autumn 2004

 

Description

 

This course serves as a framework within which senior honors students in history prepare to write their honors

theses. We begin with a discussion of some important conceptual and methodological questions historians face

today. This is intended to help you to develop critical skills for evaluating historical writing, and to begin working

on your own scholarly research. We conclude with a series of “workshops” in which we collectively discuss and

critique student research proposals and historiographical essays.

 

Objectives and Assignments

 

During this quarter, you are expected to: 1) precisely define your research project, 2) read extensively in relevant

secondary literature, 3) undertake preliminary research in primary sources, 4) participate in class discussions

and peer evaluation of student work. The actual writing of the thesis takes place, and will be accomplished next

quarter (HIST 492).

 

You will also be asked to: 1) complete a set of assigned readings, 2) write a short 4-5 page thesis prospectus

(including a 1-2 page bibliography of primary and secondary sources), and 3) write a 10-12 page historiographical

essay that assesses four to five secondary works relevant to your thesis topic. (Additional guidelines for writing assignments will be distributed.)

 

The Senior Thesis

 

The senior thesis should be between 35 and 50 pages in length (not including endnotes or appendices), typed,

double-spaced in a 12-point font. It may be written on any topic that is historical in nature, (that is, it must deal in

some way with past human experience). The thesis must be grounded significantly in primary sources, by which I

mean historical artifacts created during the period you are studying. Such sources need not be written, nor do they

need to be “historical” in the conventional sense – poems, plays, coins, films, or photographs may well be more

central to your enterprise than newspaper articles, government documents, statutes, or diaries.

 

Writing a thesis requires greater individual initiative and work than you are likely to have done in other courses.

Students will meet with me on an individual basis this quarter and next to report on your progress. Weekly seminar

meetings in fall quarter (HIST 491) will provide a forum for the exchange of ideas, and an atmosphere of group

support as you begin your research. Attendance is expected. We will not meet regularly as a group during winter

quarter (HIST 492), as you will be working independently on your theses.  We will, however, reconvene the class at

the end of winter quarter, where you will share the results of your research, get feedback from your peers, and

complete the final revisions to your thesis.

 

A few additional guidelines: 1) Students should define a research project that can be completed successfully with

primary sources available in the UW libraries. Reliance upon distant archives, or on primary materials that can only

be accessed through Interlibrary Loan is discouraged; 2) Students should not choose a topic that requires extensive research in a language other than English, unless they have fluency in that language; 3) At each stage of your

research, you should consult with an appropriate UW faculty mentor who is a specialist in your topic area. (If

necessary, I will facilitate the process of choosing a faculty mentor); 4) Students should consult the Chicago Manual

of Style for guidelines for mechanics and footnoting.

 

 Class Schedule (click links to access articles through UW electronic journal database)

 

October 4: Introduction

 

Overview of course and discussion of syllabus

 

October 11: Doing Library Research

 

Meeting with History Librarian Theresa Mudrock, Suzallo Library

 

October 18: Narrative, Context and Event

 

Eric Foner, The Story of American Freedom

 

Thomas Bender, “Strategies of Narrative Synthesis in American History,” American Historical Review, February

2002, vol. 107.1

October 25: Self, Subject and Archive

 

Thomas Holt, “Marking Race, Race-Making and the Writing of History,” American Historical Review, February 1995,

vol. 100.1

 

Carolyn Steedman, “Something She Called a Fever: Michelet, Derrida and Dust,” American Historical Review,

October 2001, vol. 106.4

 

November 1: Periodization, Space and Territory

 

Michael Geyer and Charles Bright, "World History in a Global Age," American Historical Review, October 1995,

vol. 100.4

 

Charles Maier, “Consigning the Twentieth-Century to History: Alternative Narratives for the Modern Era,” American Historical Review, June 2000, vol. 105.3

 

November 8: No Class Meeting

 

PROSPECTUS GUIDELINES

 

November 15: Prospectus Workshop

 

Discussion of and Critique of Thesis Prospectus (Groups A/B)

 

November 22: Prospectus Workshop

 

Discussion and Critique of Thesis Prospectus (Groups C/D)

 

November 29: No Class Meeting

 

December 6: Essay Workshop

 

Discussion and Critique of Historiographical Essays (Groups A/B)

 

December 13: Essay Workshop

 

Discussion and Critique of Historiographical Essays (Groups C/D)