Social Work 561
Health Care Policy Fall, 2002
Professor Gunnar Almgren
Class Meeting Times: Thursdays 1:30-4:20 P.M. , SWS 230
Office: SW 127L
Office Hours: Thursdays 8:30 AM or by appointment Phone: 685-4077, e-mail mukboy@u.washington.edu
Web Homepage: http://faculty.washington.edu/mukboy/home/almgren.htm
I. General Course Description
The intent of this course is to acquaint future social work professionals in health care with the organization of the U.S. health care system, the historical development and current structure of health care policy at the state and national level, the basic features and professional challenges posed by managed care, and contemporary policy issues as they relate to the values and political agenda of the social work profession.
The course begins by providing an overview of alternative frameworks for health policy analysis, followed by an historical review of the organization of American medicine and health care policy from a political economy perspective. The course content then shifts to a more in-depth analysis of the role of race and social class in determining access to both health and health care. The next part of the course content then embarks on a comparative cross-national analysis of the development, organization, and financing of the health care system in the United States, with particular attention to the values, beliefs, social institutions, public policies, and specific actions of government that have shaped its structure. The course then embarks on a specific examination of the structure, processes, and policy implications of managed care and the "corporatization" of American health care. The next two weeks of the course then considers two special areas of policy focus: long term care and an examination of contemporary debates concerning the role of distributive justice in determining the limits of medical intervention.
The final weeks of the course consider current national and local policy trends in the financing of health care, with special emphasis on implications for the poor. Because we are in the midst of a vigorous and critical national debate on pharmaceutical benefits and pricing practices, we conclude the course with a consideration of this issue and its policy implications.
The learning objectives of the course are as follows:
1) To be able to define, from a social work value perspective, the strengths and weaknesses of the current state of health care and health care policy in the United States.
2) To be able to describe, in general terms, the historical development of the mixed private and public model of health care in the United States and the emergence of the medical industrial complex.
3) To be able to summarize, in general terms: the basic structure and features of private and public health care financing, the fundamental changes taking place in the public and private financing structure, and the implications of managed care for the social work agenda.
4) To be able to describe the essential reasons why the current structure of health care and health care financing in the United States promotes contributes to diminished access to health care for the poor and near poor.
5) To be able to define key managed care concepts and trends, as well as the interdependent relationship between the corporate transformation of health care, the emergence of managed care systems, and the maintenance of systems of social stratification.
6) To understand and be able to describe the organization of long term care and the emerging challenges of long term care policy.
7) To be able to understand the basic political processes and social forces involved in health care reform, both at the state and the national levels.
8) To be able to identify the essential features of the dominant models for state and national health care reform, and the extent to which they are aligned with social work values.
9) To be able to understand the basic structure of Washington State’s current approaches to health care for at-risk populations, and its likely advantages and drawbacks as a model for health care reform at the national level.
10) To be able to articulate a definition of "universal access" to health care that considers issues of rationing and distributive justice.
11) To be informed and articulate on the key issues in health care policy.
12) To become familiar with various methods employed by social workers that have successfully advocated for improvements in health care policy.
II. Readings, Learning Assignments and Grading
Readings In order to strike a balance possible between availability of course material and prohibitive expense, I have used a combination of two softcover texts, and a list of selected papers and reports I have made available on my instructional website, and some readings on 4 hour reserve at the SSW library. I will also, from time to time, recommend source materials be reviewed on the web. The required texts are:
Schamess and Lightburn, Humane Managed Care? (1998 NASW Press), available through University Bookstore at $29.95 (used $22.50).
Bodenheimer and Grumbach. Understanding Health policy : A Clinical Approach. New York : London : Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill, 2002. Available through University Bookstore at $34.95.
Although the assigned readings for the first class session do not need to be read in advance, it is expected that students will have read the assigned readings in advance of all other class sessions. You will probably find the readings vary greatly to extent that they are easy or difficult to grasp. The most informative readings are sometimes conceptually abstract and require close analysis from the reader. The best advice is to avoid trying to read all of the assigned articles in one sitting and be willing to bring up points that seem confusing during class discussion. There is a tremendous amount of material related to health care policy, and I have endeavored to be selective and keep the expectations reasonable and consistent with graduate level work.
Internet Resources: Over the past few years, various organizations concerned with health care policy have established websites for the dissemination and exchange of information and commentary. In fact, many of the selected readings and reports I have made available on my instructional website are far more timely and relevant than current professional journal articles. You will find on my instructional website several health policy links that collectively many of the issues of core relevance to health policy.
Learning Assignments and Grading
There are three assignments in the course which collectively are 100% of the course grade. All three assignments are designed to contribute to your learning.
Assignment #1 Discussion Questions (20% course grade)
At various times throughout the quarter I will be handing out discussion questions that are based on some of that week’s assigned readings. Handwritten responses to the questions are entirely acceptable, as long as the writing is neat and legible. The questions will always be due at the end of the following week’s class and will be used as a basis for in-class discussion of the readings. Grading will be based upon the extent to which the responses show mastery of the reading material and evidence of critical thinking.
Assignment #2 Small Employer Survey Project (50% of grade, due December 16th)
The most determinant structural feature of U.S. healthcare system is its status as primarily an employment based health care insurance system. Although many employers spend a significant proportion of their revenue on employee health insurance, small employers are not required by law to provide their employees with health care insurance and larger employers can avoid the costs of contributing to health care insurance by using temporary and part-time employees. Minorities and women are particularly harmed by these practices in that they are far more likely to work for small employers, or on a part-time basis for large employers.
This assignment requires you to survey the businesses you most often patronize in order to gain information on three issues that are fundamental to health care access issues:
A second part of this assignment requires you to summarize your findings and identify the major policy implications. By the second week in class, I will hand out a specific set of guidelines and helpful suggestions for this assignment.
Assignment #3 Final Paper (30% of grade, due December 16th)
There are two options for the final paper. The choice of the option depends upon the knowledge base and learning goals of the individual student. Students who have little familiarity with the entitlements and limitations of medicare, medicaid, Washington State Basic Health Plan, and laws governing health care decision-making may find "Option #1 -The Policy Treasure Hunt" to be more consistent with their current career preparation priorities. On the other hand, Option #2 may be better suited to students who feel they have at least of working knowledge of key public laws and programs and want to explore a specific health care policy issue in more depth (e.g. Are government price controls of pharmaceuticals a necessary step to the expansion of pharmaceutical benefits?). Students will have a few weeks to think about their personal learning goals and then will need to inform me of which option they would prefer by the fourth week of class. As a part of making this decision, students to may want to discuss with me how either of these assignments could be used to further their personal learning goals.
Option #1 -Policy Treasure Hunt
By the fourth week of the quarter I will distribute four sample cases and 1-2 questions on each case that will require the student to do some research on applicable health care policy. I will also guide the student to source materials or agencies for answers. The cases will be relevant to policy and program issues both at the state and federal level, and will address such issues as the eligibility for medicaid assistance, medicare coverage, and the right to make particular kinds of health care decisions. The purpose of the assignment is to provide some in-depth learning of health care policy and public program issues as they are likely to come up in everyday professional practice in health care settings. The completed questions are will be due by December 14th, though students are strongly encouraged to not to wait until the last week of the quarter to work on this assignment.
Option #2 -Focused Policy Paper
Students may choose to do a focused research paper on a chosen aspect of health care policy that is of particular interest to the student (e.g. accessibility of health care to undocumented farm workers or as mentioned previously the issue of government price controls for pharmaceuticals). The purpose of this assignment is to provide the student with an opportunity to an in-depth exploration of an important health care policy issue. The result of this assignment is a research paper of modest length (10 or so pages), to be handed in by December 16th.
Grading standards applied in this course will be consistent with those described in the University Handbook (Chapter 11, Section 1). Assignments that are graded at or above a 3.7 will need to be completed by the due date, reflect high standards of organization, include consideration of the key issues, and demonstrate graduate level critical thinking skills. Although the two major assignments do not need to be handed in until December 18th, I would be glad to review rough drafts/works in progress at any point prior to the last week of class if any student would like feedback prior to the final due date.
Students with Disabilities
If you would like to request academic accommodations due to a disability, please contact Disabled Student Services, 448 Schmitz, 206-543-8924 (V/TTY). If you have a letter from Disabled Student Services indicating you have a disability that requires academic accommodations, please present the letter to me so we can discuss the accommodations you might need for this class.
Weekly Class Schedule
Week 1 October 3
Course Overview and Alternative Frameworks for Health Policy Analysis
From Schamess and Lightburn , Humane Managed Care?:
Preface
Rosenberg, G..Social Work in a Health and Mental Health Managed Care Environment. pp. 3-22
Schamess. Corporate Values and Managed Mental Health Care: Who Profits and Who Benefits. pp. 23-35
Gelber. Is Managed Care the Way to Go? -Deciding Whether to Embark. pp. 85-98
Davis, K.. Managed Care, Mental Illness, and African Americans: A Prospective Analysis of Managed Care Policy in the United States. pp. 51-64
From Bodenheimer and Grunbach
Introduction, pp 1-5.
Week 2 October 10
The Organization of American Medicine and Traditions in U.S. Health Policy
Policy Links: Selected Papers:
No. 1. "A Conversation with Victor Fuchs: An Economists View of Health Care Reform."
No. 2. Health Care Financing Administration. (1999) National Health Expenditure Projections: 1998-2008.
No. 3. Hunt, and Kim (1997). The Financial Burden of Self-Paid Insurance on the Poor and Near Poor. The Commonwealth Fund.
No. 4. Starr, Paul. What Happened to Health Care Reform?. The American Prospect. Vol 20 (Winter 1995): pp. 20-31.
From Bodenheimer and Grunbach
Chapters 6 and 7 pp 53-77
Week 3 October 17
Public Health and the Role of Social Factors in Access to Health
From Schamess and Lightburn , Humane Managed Care?:
Perloff, J. Medicaid Managed Care and Urban Poor People: Implications for Social Workers. pp. 65-74.
Braverman, A. Losing Innocents. pp. 240-246
From Bodenheimer and Grunbach
Chapter 3 pp. 15-33
Policy Links: Selected Papers
No. 5 Almgren G. and M. Ferguson (1999). The Urban Ecology of Hospital Failure: Hospital Closures in the City of Chicago, 1970-1991. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare. December, 1999. Pp. 5-26.
*No. 6 Guest, Almgren and Hussey. (1998)The Ecology of Race and Socioeconomic Distress: Infant and Working Age Mortality in Chicago. Demography Vol. 35 (1) pp. 23-34.
No. 9 Bedetti, Duchan, Schoen and Shikles (1999). Can't Afford to Get Sick: A Reality for Millions of Working Americans . The Commonwealth Fund.
No. 10 Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to Health Care. UCLA Center for Health Policy Research and the Henry T. Kaiser Foundation.
Library Reserve Reader
*Almgren, Guest, Imerwarh and Spittel. (1998) Joblessness, Family Disruption and Violent Death in Chicago, 1970-1990. Social Forces Vol 76 (4) pp. 1437-1464.
*Acevdo-Garcia, Delores. (2000) Residential Segregation and the Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases. Social Science and Medicine Vol. 51 pp.1143-1161.
*Optional Readings
Week 4 October 24
Private and Public Financing of Health Care: Current Structures and Cross-National Comparisons
Policy Links: Selected Papers
No. 11. HCFA (2000). Medicare Basics.
No. 12. Medicaid: A Primer. (1999) The Henry J. Kaiser Foundation.
No. 13. World Health Report 2000. World Health Organization. (Read Overview, Chapter 5 and review data on Statistical Annex, Table 1, Health System Attainment and Performance in all Member States, Ranked by Eight Measures, Estimates for 1997.
No. 14. Canada's Healthcare System. Health Care Policy Division. Health Canada.
No. 15. Anderson, Gerald (1998). Multinational Comparisons of Health Care : Expenditures, Coverage, and Outcomes. Center for Hospital Finance and Management Johns Hopkins University
From Bodenheimer and Grunbach
Chapter 2 (pp. 5-14) and Chapter 15 (pp. 176-184)
Week 5 October 31
Managed Care as an Object of Policy, Professional Conflict, and Professional Adaptation
Schamess and Lightburn. Humane Managed Care?:
Davis, K.. Managed Health Care: Forcing Social Work to Make Choices and Changes. pp. 409-424.
Vandivort-Warren, R.. How Social Workers can Manage Managed Care. pp. 255-267.
Siskind, A. Agency Mission, Social Work Practice, and Professional Training in a Managed Care Environment. pp. 180-186.
Trugerman, A. All Managed Care is Not Equal: The Relationship Between Behavioral Cost and Care Management. pp. 194-198
Almgren, G. Primary Care as a Context for Mental Health Practice. pp. 353-368.
From Bodenheimer and Grunbach
Chapter 5, pp. 44-53
Week 6 November 7
Managed Care and the Corporate Transformation of Health Care: Implications for Equitable Access to Health Care
Policy Links: Selected Papers
No 16 Bell (1996). Saving Their Assets: How to Stop Plunder at Blue Cross and Other Nonprofits. The American Prospect Vol 26: 60-66.
No 17 Sprinkle (1997). Corporatism in Question: A Note on Managed Care. Report from the Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy: 1-9.
No. 18. Wynne, Michael. (2000) The Rise and Fall of Columbia HCA. The Corporate Health Care Homepage
Reader:
*Amsel. Corporate Healthcare. Tikkun Vol 12 (3) 19-26 and 76-77.
Kuttner (1996). Columbia/HCA and the Resurgence of the For-Profit Hospital Business (2 Part Series). The New England Journal of Medicine Vol 355: 362-67 and 446-51.
*Salmon (1995). A Perspective on the Corporate Transformation of Health Care. International Journal of Health Services Vol 25 (1): 11-42.
*Lurie (1987) Entrepreneurialism in Health Care: Implications for Social Work Practice and Education. Journal of Independent Social Work Vol 2 (1): 7-19.
*recommended, but optional
Week 7 November 14
The Organization and Financing of Long Term Care (Joint Class Session in B14 with Professor Semke's 561 Section)
From Bodenheimer and Grunbach
Chapter 10, pp 104-112.
Policy Links: Selected Papers
No 19 The Urban Institute. (1998) Can Private Insurance Solve the Long-Term Care Problems of the Baby Boom Generation? Report of the Urban Institute
*No 20 Wiener and Stevenson (1998) Long-Term Care for the Elderly:Profiles of Thirteen States. Report of the Urban Institute. (Read overview and review profile of Washington State).
No 21 Talking with Your Parents about Medicare and Health Coverage: Longterm Care. (2000). Henry J. Kaiser Foundation Guide.
No 37 Policy Challenges Posed by the Aging of America. A discussion briefing prepared for the Urban Institute Board of Trustees meeting, May 20, 1998. (Highly recommended!)
Reader:
Weissert W. (1985). Seven Reasons Why It Is So Difficult To Make Community Based Care Cost-Effective. Health Services Research 20 (4) pp. 423-33.
Kane, Kane and Ladd. Obstacles to Balanced State Long Term Care Systems. In The Heart of Longterm Care. Oxford University Press: 1998.
Week 8 November 21
Constructing a Meaning to "Universal Access": Distributive Justice and the Limits of Intervention:
Policy Links -Selected Papers
No 22 Cost Implications of Human Organ and Issue Transplantations, an Update: 1999. Milliman and Robertson Research Reports. (Review data on Tables 12, 13, and 14 for an overview, and full text on heart lung and bone marrow transplantation).
*No 23 Almgren, Gunnar (1993). Living Will Legislation, Nursing Home Care, and the Rejection of Artificial Nutrition and Hydration: An Analysis of Bedside Decision-Making in Three States. Journal of Health and Social Policy 4 (3). Pp. 43-63.
Reader:
Schneiderman L., Jecker N., and Jonsen A. (1990`). Medical Futility: Its Meaning and Ethical Implications. Annals of Internal Medicine. 112 (12). pp. 949-54.
Lynn J. and Childress J. (1986). Must Patients Always be Given Food and Water? (with response by Daniel Callahan). In J. Lynn (Ed.) By No Extraordinary Means: The Choice to Forgo Life Sustaining Food and Water. Bloomington. Indiana University Press. pp. 47-66.
Fox R. and Swazey J. (1992). Leaving the Field. Hastings Center Report. September-October 1992 pp. 9-15.
Callahan (1987). Allocating Resources to the Elderly. In Callahan, Setting Limits: Medical Goals in an Aging Society. 1987: Simon and Schuster. pp. 115-158.
*optional
From Bodenheimer and Grunbach
Chapter 13, pp 144-159.
Week 9 December 5
National and Local Trends in Public Finance of Health Care: Implications for the Poor
From Bodenheimer and Grunbach
Chapter 16, pp 185-194.
Policy Links -Selected Papers
No 24 Davis (1996). Medicaid: The Health Care Safety Net for the Nation’s Poor. New York: The Commonwealth Fund: 1-12
No 25 Guyer, Jocelyn (2000). Health Care after Welfare: An Update of Findings from State-Level Leavel Studies. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. (read Executive Summary and Chapter VI, summary and conclusions).
No 26 Schear. The Ultimate Self-Referral: Medicare Reform, AMA Style. The American Prospect No. 25: 68-72
No 27 Guyer, Jocelyn. Medicaid and the Uninsured: Low Income Parents Access to Medicaid 5 Years After Welfare Reform. The Kaiser Foundation Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, June 2002.
No 28 Schneider, William. (1998) The Nation; Health Care; Enemy is Bureaucrats, HMO or Feds. Los Angeles Times on July 12, 1998, made available by the American Enterprise Institute.
Reader
Week 10 December 12**
Special Focus: A Nation in Search of a Remedy for Prescription Drugs
No 29 Goozner, Merrill. (2000) The Price Isn't Right. The American Prospect. Vol 11 (20)
No 30 Calfee, John. (1999) Why Pharmaceutical Price Controls Are Bad for Patients. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
No 31 Haase and Aldrich (2000). An Outpatient Prescription Drug Benefit for Medicare. The Century Foundation.
No 32 Cost Overdose: Growth in Drug Spending for the Elderly: 1992-2010 Families USA Publication 00-107
*No 33 Fuchs, James, Mays and Schaefer (2000) Analyzing Options to Cover Prescription Drugs for Medicare Beneficiaries. The Henry J. Kaiser Foundation.
No 34 The Best Value in Medicine Today: How Prescription Drugs Account for a Fraction of the Health Care Cost Increases While Helping to Offset Other Health Care Costs. PhRMA Policy Papers June 2002.
*Optional Reading
**Although the UW Academic Calendar lists December 11 as the last day of instruction for Fall term, I will extend the course over the full 10 sessions that is typical for MSW courses. Attendance at the final class session is not compulsory, but recommended for the full benefit of the course.