Webquest Project Rubric
|
4 Points |
3 Points |
2 Points |
1 Point |
0 Points |
Argument |
Clearly articulated, logically organized argument. >3 proper references. |
Logical argument, clearly organized. 2-3 references, properly annotated. |
Logical argument, but not as organized. 1 Reference. |
Difficult to read. Argument is based on opinion. No references. |
Unreadable, no organization. |
Language |
Less than three total spelling/ grammar errors. |
More than three, less than seven errors. |
More than ten errors. |
Difficult to read and understand. |
Unreadable. |
Complete-ness |
Well organized report with extensive use of narrative, photos, and data tables. Conclusion is fully supported by data. A complete and well supported “story” from question to conclusion. |
Organized report using narrative and presenting data. Story not as easy to follow, gaps in presentation. Conclusion is not fully supported by data. |
Report is loosely organized. Narrative leaves out some details; data is presented, but not interpreted. Conclusion is broad and general, not supported by data. |
Unorganized report. Data not presented in comprehensible fashion. Conclusion does not reflect data. |
Raw data and notes submitted. |
Visual Design, Graphics, Layout |
Report is visually appealing and easy to read. Graphics and photos inserted to illuminate difficult to understand areas. |
Report is typed and organized logically. Photos are used help to represent data. |
Report consists solely of text, no additional information. |
Report does not follow normal format but is understandable by someone familiar with the process. |
Report consists of raw data and notes. Unreadable as submitted. |