Victoria A.
Lawson Spring
2003
Office 303-D
Smith Tel:
543-5196
GEOGRAPHY 531: Making Development
Geography
“As
most of us are aware, development rarely seems to ‘work’ – or at least with the
consequences intended or the outcomes predicted. Why then, if it is so unworkable, does it not
only persist but seem continuously to be expanding its reach and scope?”
(Crush, 1995: 4)
“The
notion and practice of development have been severely critiqued from both
modernist and postmodern perspectives, yet the global development industry
flourishes” (Blaikie, 2000: 1033)”
This
seminar assesses recent intellectual trends within development geography and
analyzes development theory and practice from a feminist
political-economy perspective. Geography’s power in analyzing development
stems from its enduring interest in the everyday, the mundane (Hanson, 1992). This emphasis on the world not as we would
like it to be but as it is, acts as a check on abstract theory and bears witness
to the impacts of development in places.
Geographers have also insisted on the importance of relational analyses
of place as the contexts within which power relations are constituted and in
which identities take shape and salience.
And geographers have argued for the mutual interconnections of material
and discursive processes. In this way,
geography challenges much development theory by pointing out that development
does not exist as a thing, or an end point.
Rather, development is a series of relations between places, social
groups, cultures, spheres of production and consumption. Development is viewed as both a politically
powerful discourse and as relentlessly material, entailing substantial
transformations of society as a result of these power relations. Livelihoods are transformed, people and
communities are moved, social relations are
reworked. Contemporary development
geography insists that these dimensions of development cannot be separated and
has insisted on the centrality of spatiality, discourse and materiality in
development debates. We
will analyze 'development' as polyvalent and contextual in terms of its
intellectual and material foundations. We will also attend to the
formation and experiences of diverse subjects (people not topics) of
development, analyzing the ways in which particular intellectual streams
privilege or erase different subjects and actors. We will also
discuss the spatiality of development -- the ways in which discourses and
practices of development link places, move through scales and operate in relation
to boundaries -- in order to reveal and help explain the paradoxes of
development. In so doing, we will assess the ways in which analyzing the
spatiality of development processes works towards democratizing
development.
Course Requirements include:
i) Completing all assigned readings before
class meetings, and participating in critical discussions of those readings.
ii) Leading a class session
(designed by you) that engages materials from the readings.
iii) Completing a research paper (20
pages) prompted by themes raised in class and guided by your own research
trajectory.
iv) Writing a ‘think piece’ on 1 reading each
week of the quarter. These will be
one paragraph in length, discussing your reaction to one of the readings for
that week, these will be circulated at the beginning
of the class session and will be incorporated into our activities for that
session.
Important Dates
Monday May 26th – Memorial Day holiday
Wednesday June 4th -- last class
Friday June 13th -- end of finals week
V.A. Lawson Spring
2003
Session 1: Introduction [April 2nd]
Discussion of intellectual framing of the course.
All participants will introduce themselves and their interests. Class discussion of learning goals and
approaches to learning that are most successful for each person. Discussion of what brought students to the
course and of what each person hopes to take away.
Session 2: Development Theory in Geography [April 9th]
Hart, G. 2001.
Development critiques in the 1990s: culs de sac and promising paths’ Progress
in Human Geography 25(4): 649-658
Cowen, M. and R. Shenton, 1996.
Doctrines of Development.
Hart, G. 2002.
Geography and development: development/s beyond neoliberalism?
Power, culture, political-economy’ Progress
in Human Geography 26(6): 812-822
Glassman, J. 2002 ‘Development Theory in Geography’ International Encyclopedia of the Social and
Behavioral Sciences, UW Reference Library
Supplemental
Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering Development.
Peet, R
(with
Yapa, L and B. Wisner.
1995. 'Building a Case Against Economic Development' Geojournal
35(2): 105-118.
Toye, J. 1987. Dilemmas
of Development: Reflections on the Counterrevolution in Development Theory and
Policy.
Banuri, T.
1990. 'Modernization and its
Discontents: A Cultural Perspective on the Theories of Development' in F.A. Marglin and S. Marglin, eds.,
Dominating Knowledge. Development,
Culture, and Resistance.
Session 3: Marxian Development Geography [April 16th]
Corbridge, S.
1986. Capitalist World Development.
Peet, R.
and Hartwick, E. 1999: Theories of Development.
Pickles, J. 2001. ‘Development “Deferred”: Poststructuralism, Postdevelopment,
and the Defense of Critical Modernism’ Economic
Geography 77(4): 383-388.
Peet, D. and E. Hartwick.
2002. ‘Poststructual Thought Policing’ Economic Geography 78(1): 87-88
Pickles, J. 2002. ‘Reading Development’ Economic Geography 78(1): 89-90.
Supplemental
Corbridge, S. 1993. 'Marxisms,
modernities, and moralities: development praxis and the
claims of distant strangers' Society and Space 11: 449-472.
Corbridge, S.
1990. 'Post-Marxism and
Development Studies: Beyond the Impasse' World Development 18(5):
623-640.
Billet,
Bret. 1993. Modernization
theory and economic development: Discontent in the developing world.
Session 4: Debating critical modernist development [April 23rd]
Blaikie,
P. 2000.
‘Development, post-, anti-, and populist: a critical review’ Environment and Planning A 32: 1033-1050
Schuurman,
F.J. 2000: Paradigms lost, paradigms regained?
Development studies in the twenty-first century.
Bebbington,
A: 2000 Reencountering Development: Livelihood Transitions and Place
Transformation in the
Pred, A. and M. Watts.
1992. Reworking Modernity.
Session 5: subjects of critical modernist development [April 30th]
Video,
2001: La Senorita Extraviata [SHOW THIS]
Wright,
M. 2003.
‘From Protests to Politics: Sex Work, Women’s Worth and Ciudad Juarez
Modernity’ Manuscript in progress,
Mullings,
B. 1999.
‘Sides of the Same Coin? Coping
and Resistance among Jamaican data-entry operators’ Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89(2): 290-311.
Safa, H.
2002. ‘Women and Globalization: lessons
from the
Mutersbaugh,
T. 2002.
‘The number is the beast: a political-economy of organic-coffee
certification and producer unionism’ Environment
and Planning A 34(7): 1165-1184.
Session 6: Geographies of modernist development [May 7th]
Brohman,
J. 1996.
Popular Development.
Chase,
J. 2002.
The Spaces of Neoliberalism.
Lawson,
V. 2002.
‘Global Governmentality and Graduated
Sovereignty: National Belonging among Poor Migrants in
Petras,
J. 1997.
‘Alternatives to Neoliberalism in
Ould-Mey, M.
1996. Global restructuring and peripheral states: the carrot and the stick in
Lawson,
V. 2003.
Making Development Geography,
forthcoming, chapter 2 ‘Remaking development geography’
Crush,
J. 1995. Power of Development.
Marchand, M. and J. Parpart.
1995. Feminism, postmodernism, development.
Kabeer, N.
1994. Reversed Realities. Gender
hierarchies in development thought.
Nagar,
R., Lawson, V. McDowell, L. and Hanson, S.
2002: Locating Globalization: feminist (re)readings of the subjects and
spaces of globalization. Economic Geography 78(3), 285-306.
Radcliffe, S.
2001. ‘Development, the state and
transnational political connections: state and subject formation in
Radcliffe, S.
2003. ‘The transnationalization
of gender and re-imagining of Andean indigenous development’ chapter 6 in
forthcoming book on indigenous transnationalism.
Perrault,
T. 2003.
‘Making Space. Community
Organization, Agrarian Change and the Politics of Scale in the Ecuadorian
Amazon’ Latin American Perspectives
30(1): 96-121.
Silvey,
R. 2001.
‘Spaces of Protest: Gender, Migration and Labor Activism in
Supplemental
Escobar, A. 1992 'Imagining a Post-Development
Era? Critical Thought, Development and
Social Movements' Social
Text pp.20-56.
Escobar, A. and S. Alvarez eds., The Making of Social Movements in
Kuppers, G (ed),
1994. Voices from the Latin American Women’s Movement. G.
Kuppers ed.
Rosset,
P. 1995.
‘Understanding
Alvarez, S.
1989. 'Politicizing Gender and
Engendering Democracy' in Democratizing
Session 9: Geographies of poststructural development -- The International of Hope
[May 28th]
Slater, D.
1992. ‘Theories of Development
and Politics of the Post-Modern -- Exploring a Border Zone’ Development and Change 23(3): 283-319.
Corbridge, S.
1998. “Beneath the Pavement Only
Soil’: The Poverty of Post-Development’ Journal of Development Studies 34(6):
138-148.
Esteva, G. and P. Madhu.
1998. ‘From Global to Local:
Beyond Neoliberalism to the International of Hope’ in
Grassroots Postmodernism.
Rahnema, M. and V. Bawtree.
1997. The Post-Development
Reader.
Escobar, A. 2001.
‘Culture sits in places: reflections on globalism
and subaltern strategies of localization’ Political
Geography 20: 139-174.
Supplementary
Esteva, G.
1987. 'Regenerating People's
Space' Alternatives XII(1): 136-.???
Gupta, A. 1999. Postcolonial Developments. Agriculture in the making of modern India.
Agnew,
J. 2000.
‘Globalization and the New Spatiality of Power’. Paper presented at Conference on Neoliberalism in
Hall, S.
1991. 'The Local and the Global,
Globalization and Ethnicity' in A. King ed. Culture, Globalization, and the World System. Department of Art and Art
History, State Unviersity of
Session 10: Agency and ethnography in studying development [June 4th]
Katz, C. 1992.
'All the World is Staged: Intellectuals and
Projects of Ethnography' Environment and
Planning D: Society and Space pp.
Silvey,
R. 2001. Feminists Talking Across
Worlds: Sweatshops and Corporatization of the
University.
Rahman, M.
1985. 'The Theory and Practice of
Participatory Action Research' in The
Challenge of Social Change O. Fals Borda, ed.
Nagar, R. and S. Raju.
2003. ‘Women, NGOs and the
Contradictions of Empowerment and Disempowerment: A Conversation’ Antipode 35(1): 1-13.
Supplemental
Burawoy, M. J. Blum, S. George, Z. Gille, T. Gowan, L. Haney, M. Klawitter, S. Lopez, S. O’ Riain,
and M. Thayer. 2000. Global
Ethnography. Forces,
Connections and Imaginations in a Postmodern World.
Katz, Cindi. 2001. ‘On the
grounds of globalization: A topography for feminist political engagement’ Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and
Society 26:4:1213-1234.
Katz, C. 1994.
'Playing the Field: Questions of Fieldwork in Geography' Professional
Geographer.
Staeheli, L. and V.
Lawson. 1994.
'A Discussion of Women in the Field: The Politics of Feminist Fieldwork'
Professional Geographer.
Patai, D.
1991. '
Miles, M. and J.Crush. 1993.
'Personal Narratives as Interactive Texts: Collecting and Interpreting
Migrant Life Histories' Professional
Geographer 45(1): 84-94.