CFR 590B Conservation and
Protected Areas Management in Human Landscapes
Instructors: Kristiina Vogt (kvogt@u.washington.edu);
Van Kane (vkane@u.washington.edu);
Bianca Perla (bperla@u.washington.edu)
DAYS and TIME: M, W from 9:30 – 10:50
PLACE: MGH 248
Grading:
·
Class participation
[10%]
·
½ page write up on
weekly readings (to be emailed in before class meeting) [20%]
·
Student(s) lead
presentation and provide background material prior to presentation in class of
either (1) a case study of protected areas using premises or (2) use a paper
that speaks to one of these premises [35%]
·
Class paper or essay due
Finals Week or earlier if able to (no more than 10 double spaced pages)
entitled “New Visions of Protected Areas for the 21st Century”.
Paper should examine the validity of the premises in a Real World situation and
should build the ‘storyline’ using class lectures, weekly reading materials and
student presentations [35%]
Class goals:
Learn about the issues, problems and solutions for protected areas around the
world since they exist in human landscapes. This seminar will examine the
historical, ecological, human dimensions, and management issues that are
challenging the development and the maintenance of protected areas.
We address the main
questions: What are protected areas protecting? What are the implications for
Park sustainability if people do not want Parks? How much do protected areas
have to be marketed today to be accepted by society? How much do Parks really
conserve biodiversity? How does one operationalize the development of protected
areas when humans have divergent values for them and when there is a need to
provide sustainable livelihoods in rural areas? and How successful are
protected areas today?
Guest lecturers will present
international and Pacific Northwest US cases in forests and in marine
ecosystems that will examine the policy, social dimensions, and the role of
science and informatics in protected areas management. Four premises will be
used to focus class discussions (provided below) and class participants should
be able to defend or argue against each premise at the end of the class. Each
class participant will also be able to articulate a vision for protected areas
for the 21st century based on class lectures and presentations, and
reading materials provided in class.
NOTE: class lecture schedule
may change based on guest lecturer calendars
DATE |
TOPIC |
Week 1:
General Introduction: Premises for Class; History of Protected Areas |
|
Jan 4 – wed |
Bianca
Perla [class instructor, UW] “History of Protected Areas; What are Protected
Areas Protecting?” |
Week 2:
Introduce Issues with Protected Areas and Creating Protected Areas |
|
Jan 9 - mon |
Bianca
Perla and input from Albright grand-daughter on “How National Park Service
was Created in the United States” |
Jan 11 - wed |
Jon
Hoekstra [Senior
Scientist, Global Priorities Group, Nature Conservancy, Washington] “What is the Conservation Status of the World” |
Week 3: Conservation Status Globally |
|
Jan 16 - mon |
HOLIDAY |
Jan 18 - wed |
Van
Kane [class instructor, UW] “Yellowstone case – introduce issues with
Protected Areas” - bitter opposition to its creation, exploitation of its
resources, a changing and conflicting set of missions, problems in ecosystem
management, scholarly consideration of it as an ICDP, degraded and
manipulated ecosystems, etc. |
Week 4:
Global and Local Dimensions of Protected Areas and Conservation |
|
Jan 23 - mon |
Toral Patel-Weynand
[Director, International Biological Informatics Program, USGS – National
Program Office, Virginia] “International Political Institutions, Biological
Informatics and Networks of Protected Areas” |
Jan 25 - wed |
Guest Lecturer “Challenges
in Being a Small Non-profit in Conservation” |
Week 5:
The Human Dimensions of Protected Areas |
|
Jan 30 - mon |
Patrick Christie [School of
Marine Affairs, Jackson School of International Studies, UW] “Integrated
Assessment of MPA’s and the importance of measuring human dimensions in a
rigorous and timely manner” |
Feb 1 - wed |
Gretchen Muller [Regional
Education Project Manager, National Wildlife Federation, Washington]
“Debt-for nature Swaps, Forest Conservation and the Bolivian Landscape” |
Week 6:
Science and Adaptive Management in Protected Areas |
|
Feb 6 - mon |
Regina
Rochefort [Science Advisor North Cascades National Park, Washington] “How Science Informs Management in Parks” |
Feb 8 - wed |
Guest Lecturer “Lessons on
Adaptive Management and Policy” |
Week 7:
Scale and Building a Vision to Include Humans in Protected Landscapes |
|
Feb 13 - mon |
Kristiina Vogt [class
instructor, UW] “Scale in Human and Wildland Landscapes” or Guest Speaker
“Establishing Protected Areas in China” |
Feb 15 - wed |
Guest Speaker “Vision for
the 21st Century. How to Manage Growth and Open Space” |
Week 8:
Student Presentations of a Protected Area |
|
Feb 20 - mon |
HOLIDAY |
Feb 22 - wed |
Two student presentation
(30 minutes each, 10 minutes discussion) |
Week 9:
Student Presentations of a Protected Area |
|
Feb 27 - mon |
Two student presentation
(30 minutes each, 10 minutes discussion) |
Mar 1 - wed |
Two student presentation
(30 minutes each, 10 minutes discussion) |
Week 10:
Student Presentations of a Protected Area |
|
Mar 6 - mon |
Two student presentation
(30 minutes each, 10 minutes discussion) |
Mar 8 - wed |
Two student presentation
(30 minutes each, 10 minutes discussion) |
Week 11:
Student Presentations of a Protected Area |
|
Mar 13 - mon |
Two student presentation
(30 minutes each, 10 minutes discussion) |
Mar 15 - wed |
Group Discussion: Were the
Premises Supported and How Did All Case Studies Inform the Premises
Introduced at Beginning of Class? |
Objectives
At the end of the seminar, class participants should feel comfortable debating and arguing for or against the following Premises listed below:
Premise 1: Natural resource management and uses occur in the same landscape where protected areas are being managed for conservation but both activities currently occur independently and do not inform one another. Until both activities are managed simultaneously, conservation efforts in protected areas will not succeed.
Premise 2: Today, since most people do not want protected areas to be established in their neighborhoods and since the goals of protected areas are incompatible with the cultures and economic conditions where they are being imposed, protected area managers have to provide cultural and economic opportunities for local people for protected areas to become sustainable.
Premise 3: Most protected areas do not conserve biodiversity because biodiversity conservation has to include the diversity and complexity of habitats that only are found at the landscape scale.
Premise 4: Since the amount land area currently set aside in protected status for biodiversity conservation is inadequate and more land is being lost from its natural state because of human population growth and expansion into non-urban areas, conservation practitioners need to shift to managing wildland-urban interfaces to provide habitat for species of conservation interest.