| SITE MAP | SEARCH! | E & B GEOG | RESOURCES | A-Z INDEX |
A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z
- S -
SAARC
SADC
SACU
SAP
Satisficer, satisficing
Scope Economies
"Secondary Sector Activities"
Seed-bed hypothesis
SEGMENT REPORTING/DISCLOSURE:
Selective closure
SEM
Shimbel Index
Shitauke gaisha (jp) = subcontract(ed) company
Shunk Works (Strategy of ...)
SITC
Site
Situation
Smart (Cities, Highways, Cars...)
SME
SOC - Social Overhead Capital
Social
Capital [see also:
Bowling Alone (Putnam)]
Sogo shosha (jp)
Space-cost curve
Space-Differentiating Forces
Spatial demand curve
If the original individual demand functions are uniform and linear (or
convex) and the
population distribution is uniform, the resulting aggregate demand
functions has to be convex. [See also
"free spatial demand curve",
Parr & Denike (1970)
and Loesch, engl. ed., p.106]
"Spatial" as different from "regional"
Spatial differentiation
Spatial interaction
Spatial iso-outlay line
This is a theoretical construct (developed by
Leon Moses in 1958) used
to introduce space into
micro-economic production theory. The curve represents the results of an
optimization process. Every point on the curve represents different
locations but equal total production
costs (outlays) based on varying (optimal) input combinations (and
resulting varying
transport costs for these inputs). In Moses' model, "each point along
this
curve corresponds to a particular location
along the arc IJ, and shows the
one combination of factors which the firm would purchase at that
particular location, given the dollar expenditure, transport rates, and
base prices of the inputs." (p.63) [this arc serves the purpose to
keep the distance to the market constant]. Every point along this arc has
its own particular ratio of delivered prices of M1 and M2 due to the
changing distances (transport costs) for M1 and M2.
Finding the optimum location along this arc now involves the production
function (represented by isoquants). Points of tangency identify the
optimal location along the arc for different level of production.
[See also iso-cost curve/iso-outlay line]
Spatial margin
Spatial margin of agricultural production
"Spatial Threshold" (or "threshold range") as different from the:
"(Outer) Range of a Good or Service":
1. The "range of a good" signifies the maximum distance customers are
willing to travel or incur transport costs for in order to
purchase a good at a given (f.o.b.) price. The range of a good refers
mainly to the demand side and is defined by the maximum distance
consumers are willing to travel (or pay transport costs for) for a good or
service at a given f.o.b. price at the point of supply.
2. The "threshold range" is the minimum radius of a market area needed to
generate sufficient demand to support the supply of a good;
it refers to the minimum (potentially also the maximum) market
area which a supplier needs (or can sell to) to make
his undertaking viable.
More specifically,
"given the equilibrium f.o.b. market price; the threshold range represents
the distance to the perimeter of an area enclosing the minimum level of
aggregate demand (or a minimum population) which is sufficient to permit
the commercial supply of the good, i.e which permits only normal
profits to be made." (Parr &
Denike, 1970, p.570)
1 + 2 represent theoretical (equilibrium) concepts associated
with market area analysis and central place theory: The range has
to be larger than the threshold range.
The threshold is usually associated with the intersections between (or the
point of tangency of) the spatial demand function and the downward-
sloping average-cost curve (for the f.o.b.- case).
Special economic zones (SEZ) [China]
Spread city
Splashing ("industrial splashing")
Splash page
Standard of living
Statistics
[Online Text]
Sticky place
Strategic alliance
Strategic decision-making
Strategy
The concept of (competitive) strategy plays a crucial role in Michael
Porter's work on "Competitive Advantage". Porter suggests that businessmen
face the choice between three arch-typical generic strategies:
Structure
Now, we want to add another common meaning of "structure".
"Structure" tends to imply relative stability or
permanence, i.e. if there are changes in the structure ("structural
change") such changes would be slower than the changes which occur within
or around such a (more or less) "given" structure.
Compositional or interaction structures are identified in economic analysis
as facets or phenomena which tend to change only relatively slowly
or only in the "long-run". Thus, for certain types of
("short-run") analysis, they can be assumed not to change at all, i.e. to
remain constant, while there are other changes which are ocurring
within such given structures. Location quotients, multipliers (in
the basic/non-basic model), the "beta index" (in network
analysis) or input coefficients (in input-output analysis) represent
masures of such structures. Of course, such structures do
tend to change over longer periods of time, but in the meantime,
our analysis is made easier because we can concentrate on
those changes or stimuli which change more upruptly or can be
influenced more readily and/or they change in a way which
is not well understood (and thus need our attention).
Typically, we try to exploit this assumption of a "given
structure" in (short-run analysis) to the fullest before we then
explore changes in these structures (in more long-run
analysis). Year to year changes in regional employment are typically
analysed by assuming "given structures", while we tend to
focus on structural changes (e.g. those resulting from
technological changes) when we are interested in true
"regional economic development" and, for example, the processes
associated with sectoral employment shifts
("Three-Sector-Hypothesis").
Thus, the two important attributes of the concept of "structure" are
A. Chandler's definition of (organizational) structure: "the design of
organization through which the enterprise is administered" (Strategy and
Structure, 1966, p.16)
Important semantic clarifications were provided by
Fritz Machlup.
Subcontracting
Subsistence agriculture
Substitutability
Substitution - The principle of substitution
Alfred Marshall, Principles of Economics, Book 5, ch.III, #3, p.284:
Book 5, Chapter IV #3, p.295:
Suburban Activity Centers (SAC)
Sustainable development
Return to Econ & Bus Geog || Glossaries
[See Stafford & Watts, 1991, p.428; Watts and Stafford,
1986, p.213]
In still other words, the spatial demand curve represents
the
aggregate demand schedule (price/quantity demand function) of consumers
distributed in space with varying distances from a given central location.
"Price" includes transport costs from this location to consumers. The
peculiar attribute is that the individual demand functions are based on
delivered prices, whereas the supplier aggregates the demand function he
is facing on the bases of f.o.b.prices.
Such a
demand curve would a "free(ly downward sloping) spatial demand curve" if
it is not constrained by neighboring competitors.
The significance of these concepts relates to the equilibrium conditions
for market areas. (i.e. what kinds of market areas we
would expect under defined conditions). What is important here is that
these concepts allow us to introduce the full gamut of
supply-side (cost) and demand considerations and differentiations, related
to the the particular product and its
production/supply as well as differences in preferences and ability to pay
among consumers as well as differences in transport
costs and demand densities.
Thus,
"structure" refers to both, the internal "composition" of a whole or
system, as well as to the interactive relations between the system's
components.
'Structural Change' would therefore then
refer to relatively
long-term / slow/ gradual changes in such internal composition and/or
pattern of interdependence.
within an aggregate whole, such as a population or a regional economy.
[see also: Roger Hayter, Dynamics of Industrial Location, 1997, p.323]
"As far as the knowledge and business enterprise of the producers
reach,
they in each case choose those factors of production
which are best for their purpose; the sum of the supply prices of those
factors which are used is, as a rule, less than the sum
of the supply prices of any other set of factors which could be
substituted for them; and whenever it appears to the producers
that this is not the case, they will, as a rule, set to work to substitute
the less expensive method. And further on we shall see
how in a somewhat similar way society substitutes one undertaker for
another who is less efficient in proportion to his
charges. We may call this, for convenience of reference,
The principle of
substitution."
At the beginning of his undertaking, and at every successive stage, the
alert business man strives so to modify his
arrangements as to obtain better results with a given expenditure, or
equal results with a less expenditure. In other words, he
ceaselessly applies the principle of
substitution, with the purpose of
increasing his profits; and, in so doing, he seldom fails
to increase the total efficiency of work, the total power over nature
which man derives from organization and knowledge.
A -
B -
C -
D -
E -
F -
G -
H -
I -
J -
K -
L -
M -
N -
O -
P -
Q -
R -
S -
T -
U -
V -
W -
X -
Y -
Z
1999 [econgeog@u.washington.edu]