Winter 2001 / Geography 207 / Confidential

Evaluator:__________________________

PEER EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL & GROUP PROJECTS

(http://faculty.washington.edu/krumme/evaluation/peereval207.html)

4 = Exceptional | 3 = Exceeds Expections | 2 = Meets Expectations | 1 = Needs Improvement


REVIEWED PRESENTATION & WEBSITE (Name, Login or Group)_________________
Please use separate forms for your 3 selections; none of the selected presentations should be from your own group!


Score
  • PROJECT CONTENT (Conceptually rich? Informative? Interesting? Economic Geography?)


  • ___
  • QUALITY OF WRITING (Quality of Organization, Formulations, Grammar, Spelling, Subheadings)


  • ___
  • Overall quality of 5th-HOUR/ SERVICE-LEARNING/ OUTREACH/ SKILL-SHARING Component: (Explanation of Objectives, Links to Economic Geography, Journal, Presentation, Use of Skills in own Group or other Groups)


  • ___
  • WEB PAGE DESIGN (Hypertextuality, Integration of Various Class Assignments (Introduction, Literature Review, Location Quotient, Organizational Web review etc.) Use of Internal & Group Links, Ease of Navigation, Directory [Table of Content], Links to Subheadings etc.)


  • ___
  • QUALITY OF RESOURCES & EXTERNAL LINKS (Diversity, Appropriateness, Completeness & Quality of Citations & Annotations of References, Organization [incl. use of subheadings] of RESOURCE PAGE)


  • ___
  • SPECIAL EFFECTS (e.g. appropriate use of illustrations and graphics, if any)


  • ___
  • CLARITY OF PRESENTATION OR ORAL EXPLANATIONS:


  • ___
  • GENERAL IMPRESSION OF GROUP EFFORT: (Participation, Coordination, Group Directory, Joint Components, Consistency)


  • ___
  • Other Comments:_____________________________________________________________
  • ___