Spring 1999 / Freshmen Seminar (GS197) / Confidential

Evaluator:__________________________

SELF- & PEER EVALUATION OF WEBSITES & MINI-RESEARCH

(http://faculty.washington.edu/krumme/GS197/peerevalGS197.html)

4 = Exceptional | 3 = Exceeds Expections | 2 = Meets Expectations | 1 = Needs Improvement


NAME OF REVIEWED WEB SITE (Name or Login) ________________________


Score
  • Quality of Mini-Research Content (Conceptually rich? Informative? Interesting?)


  • ___
  • Hypertextual Design and Organization of Pages [Hypertextuality, Use of Internal & External Links, Ease of Navigation, Directory]


  • ___
  • Quality of writing. Absence of grammatical and spelling errors.


  • ___
  • Quality of four or five resources used (There can be more!). (Diversity, Appropriateness, Completeness & Quality of Annotations of References)


  • ___
  • Appearance of pages (appropriate use of background, illustrations, graphics & special effects)


  • ___
  • Clarity of Oral Explanation or Presentation (if any):


  • ___


  • Other Comments:_____________________________________________________________
  • ___


    Return to: Freshman Seminar Spring 1999
    [ krumme@u.washington.edu]