| SITE MAP | SUPPORT PAGES | LIBRARY | ECON & BUS GEOG | RESOURCES | A-Z INDEX |
| GLOSSARY | PASSWORD | 450 PAGE | CLASS CALENDAR | ECON NEWS | EXERCISES |
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, you wrote: > In light of the course, what is the significance of time geography? I > know this came up in class a bit but it was never really explained. I'm > assuming that this is one of the topics that weren't part of the class and > in my discussion, I have no direction on what to say about this topic. > > > Also, I'm under the assumption that I can make corrections to all three > papers. I would like your comments on what I can do to improve my first > paper. > Thank you, Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 22:25:12 -0800 (PST) From: Gunter KrummeSubject: Re: time geography There is a broad meaning of time geography and the role of time in everything we have covered in 450: While our models were "static", we learned how to use them to explore changes in location and land use. Think about the role of time in investments, uncertainty, turbulence etc. Time geography in a narrow sense relates to the work of Haegerstrand and others. I cover that in Geog207, seldom in 450. You can look it up in Johnston's Dictionary... Otherwise, I assume your last paper is your "best effort". For the other paper(s), just edit it/them very carefully. Otherwise, check whether my general class-comments related to papers are incorporated, that the paper has a well introduced "focus" and an appropriate structure. Your focus on Central Place theory and retail is, as I pointed out in class repeatedly, very/too broad. You could expand on your discussion of "threshold" a bit and isolate the variables which are responsible for this equilibrium. One of the most important objectives of this paper writing effort was to differentiate sub-facets in a way which is useful for the preparation of empirical research: What are you looking for when you try to research market thresholds for different kinds of retail activities? GK On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, you wrote: > I have a few questions pertaining to the test and paper 3 > > 1. For our take home part of the test: does "proofreading" just mean us > fixing grammatical/spelling/structure, or do you want an advance copy to > look at before the test? > > 2. Is there going to be a question on the test about the chapter we read > in the industrial location book? > > 3. What parts of my paper three need correcting, and what do I need to do > about it? > > Thanks! Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:12:02 -0800 (PST) From: Gunter Krumme
Subject: Re: 3 Questions 1. Proofreading means YOUR proofreading. I get it early enough. 2. All required readings are 'fair game' for the finals. 3. This is my last chance to insist that you submit at least one paper with bibliographic references IN THE TEXT. Have you ever heard of "footnotes"? I know you are trying to be original, but our task was to start off with and discuss established ideas before applying them to new contexts. Have a look at an academic journal (like the AAG Annals or "Economic Geography" or whatever) as to how this is done. We do not want to 'reinvent the wheel', thus we build on what is there already and are totally up-front as to where the ideas are coming from. We want to make it easy for readers to trace the sources and to be able to make a judgment as to the correct use of the specific literature. Example within the text: (Friedman, 1992, p.49) may refer to a specific place of the entry in the bibliography: Fred Friedman, "Thoughts in Geography," Journal of Geography, Vol.4, No.3, July 1992, pp.40-55. GK On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, you wrote: > Dear Dr. Krumme, > > I have a questions about flexibility and adaptability. > According to the webpage, adaptability means "adjustment through simple > alterations, no additional investments needed" while flexibility means > "the creation of adjustment possibilities through initial > planning of subsequent investments in response to new information". > > Could you give me an example? And I cannot link three kinds of location > flexibility to the above explanation of general flexibility (is additional > investment necessary in case of In-situ flexibility?) > Thank you.. Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 08:50:09 -0800 (PST) From: Gunter Krumme
Subject: Re: G450 If you have a building which can be modified (or the productive floor space be expanded) with minimal alterations, that would be "adaptability" If you have a building with an adjacent piece of real estate on which the original building can be expanded, that would be "flexibility". In general, the same applies to "locational flexibility/adaptability" except that locational adaptability is more difficult to achieve due to the more long-run nature of locational changes. Here the multi-locational organizations MAY have advantages since they can "shift" and pick existing locations (and their adaptability) more readily. 3 kinds? You probably mean: short-run (adaptability) medium-run (in-situ flexibility) long-run (plan for new locations) Multi-locational firms often have advantages by being able to utilize locationally differentiated adjustment abilities and thereby cut the leadtimes additionally (by being able to make appropriate adjustments with less additional investment or location-planning activities than single location firms and/or by bundling adjustment abilities at specific locations). G.K. On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, you wrote: > Dear Dr. Krumme, > Concerning the take-home exam, what do you mean by "review these few > pages"? Do you want me to summarize and analyze every topic in week 1? Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 18:48:06 -0800 (PST) From: Gunter Krumme
Subject: Re: G450 "Review" in this case (given the length limitations) should mean a relatively brief summary (of the "location Theory" entry) organized on the basis of a mix of your and Johnston's terms, and possibly picking out any point you want to argue with or you find remarkable... unless, of course, you plan to cover that in the next part of your answer... It is really up to you to decide how long this (review) introduction to the more important 2nd part should be. GK Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 08:30:34 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) From: Richard Roth
Subject: Undergraduate Research Symposium Dear Faculty: As your students prepare their final individual and group projects and presentations this quarter, remember that it's not too early to start recruiting and encouraging students to present at our annual Undergraduate Research Symposium, to be held next June 1. We offer cash prizes for best individual and group presentations, and can offer students web space now to save their current good work. Thanks. Tim Nyerges & Rick Roth =========================================================================== =========================================================================== Richard Roth rroth@u.washington.edu Assistant to the Chair voice: 206.543.3246 Department of Geography fax: 206.543.3313 University of Washington Smith Hall, Room 415-B Box 353550 Seattle, WA 98195 http://staff.washington.edu/rroth On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, you wrote: > While doing my research, I came across some interesting subjects and have > narrowed down my topic to: > How uncertainty in investment due to sensitivity to inflation affects > location. > This topic is of a great interest to me. However, I'm a bit worried that > amount of information I will be able to find is limited for this. I > haven't had too much luck finding much so far. > Can you help me with some of the keywords I could use in searching for > references for this topic? > Thanks Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 15:24:36 -0800 (PST) From: Gunter Krumme
Subject: Re: topic You have to give me the titles of the literature which you have found already and the search modes you have used.... Otherwise, I do not know where you are in your research. I also need to know what kind of "investments" you are talking about when you make the connection to inflation and location. When "things" become too difficult, always retreat to some "firm ground" under your feet. Maybe go back to "uncertainty" and make the connection to location first. Then, maybe, you can expand towards whatever you understand by "investments". What kinds of uncertainty are you dealing with when you make these connections? Differentiate and "itemize"! Which uncertainties are particularly important for retailing? Don't try too much. This is a class in location theory. G.K.
On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, you wrote: > I'm having a very difficult time finding resources for the garbage can > model but in the process I found some books that pertain to decision > theory and organizational theory. Are these helpful in understanding the > GCM? Can you suggest some keywords I could use to look up some resources > on the GCM? I was also thinking about diverting away from my original > idea and doing a paper on decision theory. What do you think? I'll plan > on talking to you after class tomorrow. > Thanks Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 13:41:36 -0800 (PST) From: Gunter Krumme
Subject: Re: paper 2 It is difficult to give advice without knowing which search systems you have used: e.g. have you used the "Expanded Academic Index" or the "Web of science citation databases"? Both can be found here: http://www.lib.washington.edu/subject/Geography/coreindex.html If you find some other starting point in the organizational or decision-theoretical literature which appears geographically more interesting and relevant to your own interests, go for it. Key words for your GCM search: avoidance, ambiguity, cognitive bias, uncertainty, information clarity, organizational anarchy, multiplicity of goals, etc. I assume you have "visited" the references cited under "garbage cans" in our glossary? G.K
In response to one of Tuesday's questions: Select your specific principle or theory for your second paper from this list of "traditions" starting at: "2.Uncertain & Turbulent Behavioral & Organizational Environments". Alternatively, you can make a one-paragraph suggestion as to the specific focus of your paper, but only if you submit it by this Friday (with my response to follow within 24 hours). What remains important is that the focus is concerned with a concept, principle or theory which does not belong to the group of partial equilibrium, optimizing theories which were part of the alternatives for paper #1. The 3-4 sentence statement which was due on Nov. 7 remains due (for all). Those of you who have not yet provided the theoretical detail of your proposal, which the requirement of "3-4 sentences" implies, are asked to make another attempt at it. The discussion page remains open...
COLLOQUIUM
SPEAKER: Mary Baker, Stanford University TITLE: Communications for Mobile People DATE: Thursday, November 2, 2000 TIME: 3:30 pm PLACE: 134 Sieg Hall HOST: Linda Shapiro ABSTRACT: People are the outsiders in the current communications revolution. Computer hosts, pager terminals, and telephones are addressable entities throughout the Internet and telephony systems. Human beings, however, still need application-specific tricks to be identified, like email addresses, telephone numbers, and ICQ IDs. The key challenge today is to find people and communicate with them personally, as opposed to communicating merely with their possibly inaccessible machines---cell phones that are turned off, or PCs on faraway desktops. The main goal of the Mobile People and IdentiScape projects is to put the person, rather than the devices that the person uses, at the endpoints of a communication session. The Mobile People Architecture introduces the concept of routing between people. To that effect, we define the Personal Proxy, which maintains the list of devices or applications through which a person is currently accessible and dispatches the communications appropriately, filtering out undesired communications and converting communications into a format that the recipient can make use of immediately. It does all this while protecting the location privacy of the recipient from the message sender and allowing the easy integration of new application protocols. The IdentiScape project introduces a name service that allows us to name people across all online applications in a unique, robust, and historically persistent manner. *NOTE* This lecture will be broadcast live via the Internet. See http://www.cs.washington.edu/news/colloq.info.html for more information.Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 13:40:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Gunter Krumme
Subject: Re: matrix exercise/midterm On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, you wrote: > Prof. Krumme, > I was wondering if we could meet sometime on Tuesday before 11:30 to > discuss the matrix exercise. I don't quite understand how it works. Was > also wondering about what needed to be done to revise my midterm. Do I > just need to re write the parts that I got incorrect? Maybe if it's > possible to explain some of this stuff via e-mail we might not have to > meet on Tuesday. Your time is much appreciated! > > Thanks Krumme's Response: I will be available after 10:30 on Tuesday if you wish to see me. Exercise: The exercise asks you to solve the problem by establishing a payoff matrix for the different configurations: alternative locations and 2 actors: big and small. I am happy to help you by email... but you have to make a start... then you ask questions which help you along. Midterm: I want you to learn from your outright mistakes as well as to improve on what you have already done -- throughout the quarter. Thus, you could, if you wish, rewrite the most "improvable" parts of your midterm and post them on a Webpage (connected or unconnected) and then tell me about it (by email). I would be happy to go over it. At the end (of the quarter), I have a full Web picture of your writing, responses to my comments, corrections and (mostly) your understanding. G.K. From krumme@u.washington.edu Wed Oct 18 22:52:46 2000 Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:40:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Gunter Krumme
Subject: Re: Midterm Questions I will try to answer your questions one by one.... In general, I recommend the use of the glossary (http://faculty.washington.edu/krumme/gloss/) G.K. On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, you wrote: > Prof. Krumme, > > 1. Can localization be described to some extent as the opposite of > globalization. Localization deals with local economics, culture and > standards of living. If this is the case, where should I look to find the > difference between urbanization and localization? Hoover and others have made the distinction between localization economies (savings/cost reductions=economies resulting from agglomeration of similar activites) and urbanization economies (see: http://faculty.washington.edu/krumme/gloss/u.html) Then there are "locality" studies which deal with local culture, "place", and "milieu" etc. But the term "localization" has not been used in this context -- as far as I know. However, you are correct in implying that "globalization" refers to processes of international dispersion (of commerce, influence, etc.) while localization refers to spatial concentration.... > 2. Distant elasticity- My understanding of distant elasticity is comprised > of a response to prices, How far is a consumer willing to travel for > goods? Fact 1-as a person moves away from the market the distance to > another market decreases. Fact 2-no matter what the cost is a person > still may not travel the distance. ***Is this pretty clear? As a general definition, distance elasticity is simply the behavioral response to distance. In more specific terms, we would relate it to purchasing goods or services...: The extent to which demand decreases with increasing transfer/transport costs. Why does this happen? People may not have/may not want to spend the money for the high transport costs, may forego the pleasure, may have other options/ alternative ways of spending the money (on substitutes), may consider visiting the competitor, possibly at a closer location etc. > > 3.Production function- The production function deals with all of the > inputs necessary for an output. Each ingredient is important and the > relationship is linear.****Is this correct? > This is correct for linear production functions (as assumed in Weber's theory). Moses looked at non-linear function allowing for substitution and scale economies. > 4.Isodopane- equal aggregate transport costs. ***Is this a sufficient > definition? This is the most that I got out of the concept. This definition is a bit too short. Isodapanes refer to the Weber model, its triangle and equilibrium location. Isodapanes represent lines (sets of points) with equal additional transport cost relative to the location with the least aggregate transport cost (that is, the aggregate of (in this case) three transport processes. (GK) Gunter Krumme, Tel. 206-543-9089; Fax: 206-543-3313; krumme@u.washington.edu; http://faculty.washington.edu/krumme/
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 13:25:06 -0700 From: Chris Grant
To: advisers@u.washington.edu Subject: Study Smarter Workshops Hello there, Thought it might be helpful to introduce myself to all of you, and to remind you of the study skills workshops for this term; hopefully, many students will attend. I started working at the Student Counseling Center in Schmitz Hall in September, and am currently coordinator of the Study Smarter workshops held in Room 171 of the Undergraduate Advising Center at Mary Gates Hall on Mondays and Tuesdays from 3:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. I am excited about the opportunity to assist students in developing more effective study strategies, and want to encourage all of you to please refer students to our workshops. The following is a list of workshops for this term: NOTE-TAKING AND LEARNING FROM YOUR TEXTBOOK Monday, October 2 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Room 171 Tuesday, October 17 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Room 171 Monday, November 6 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Room 171 MEMORIZATION SKILLS Tuesday, October 10 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Room 171 Monday, October 30 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Room 171 Tuesday, November 14 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Rm 171 Monday, November 27 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Rm 171 TIME MANAGEMENT AND PROCRASTINATION Tuesday, October 3 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Room 171 Monday, October 23 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Room 171 Tuesday, November 7 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Rm 171 TEST ANXIETY AND STRESS REDUCTION Monday, October 16 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Room 171 Tuesday, October 31 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Room 171 Monday, November 20 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Rm 171 Tuesday, November 28 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Rm 171 Monday, December 4 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Room 171 TEST-TAKING SKILLS Monday, October 9 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Room 171 Tuesday, October 24 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Room 171 Monday, November 13 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Rm 171 Tuesday, November 21 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Rm 171 Tuesday, December 5 -- 3:00 to 4:30 p.m. @ UAC, Rm 171 NOTE: We ask all students to please arrive to these workshops ten minutes early to complete a brief form before the workshop begins. Hope the quarter goes well for each of you. Looking forward to connecting with you in the future -- Chris S. Grant, Ph.D. Student Counseling Center University of Washington 401 Schmitz Hall Box 355830 Seattle, WA 98195-5830 (206) 543-1240 (206) 616-0723 TTY (206) 616-6910 FAX E-mail: csgrant@u.washington.edu Website: http://depts.washington.edu/scc/
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 13:41:29 -0700 (PDT) From: C. Katz
To: Geography Department Subject: GeogD: The Write Center After a bumpy start, the Write Center is back up and running. The tutor this quarter is David Paschane, and it's safe to start sending students to the center starting next week. As usual, we have little flyers if you want to pass out the center's hours to students in your classes. Please contact David Paschane for additional information. (paschane@u.washington.edu) Thanks! Carolina Carolina M. Katz Department of Geography, Box 353550
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, you wrote: > 1. How well will these concepts need to be explained? > critical isodapane (Weber) > spatial iso-outlay line (or locational isocost curve) (Moses) > locational rent function (Thnen) > bid price curve or bid rent function (Alonso) > spatial demand function (Lsch) > > 2. Has these cocepts been coverd yet? > > Transaction Cost Model > Bounded Rationality > Product Cycle (or Product Life Cycle) > Difference between (Location) "Factors" and "Conditions"? > Difference between Labor Segmentation under Fordism and Labor Segmentation > based on Flexibility > > Three Causes for Uncertainty > Maximin/minimax (Wald) Strategy > Expected Payoff (or Value) Maximization Principle > Environmental Turbulence > Garbage Can Model of Organization > > 3.How much emphasis should we put into researching the theory and > history? Should we apply more attention to the significance and how the > theory is being used in the "real world"? > ANSWER: Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:56:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Gunter Krumme
Subject: Re: Questions Here are my answers: 1.: "Very well", in as much as we will have covered these concepts in class or in required basic readings. These concepts "represent" much of the body of classical theory. All of them tend to be covered already in Geography 207 to some extent. 2.: As you know, we have not yet covered those concepts. (Please study the course outline and your notes.) 3.. The emphasis is clearly on the theoretical foundation. If you feel that the history of the concept is important for understanding its development, then you may have to be an historical theorist for a bit. If you find literature in which your selected concept has been discussed, compared, assessed or applied to some example, you should, of course, bring it into your paper. If you do not find such literature, then you will have to do that yourself. You always can use examples for theoretical point you are making. However, you are NOT expected to do any applied research yourself. Keep the questions coming. GK
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, you wrote: > Prof Krumme, > > For the table on contents, > since we're to research the 1. theory, 2. history, and 3. significance of > the theory- are these categories to be used as Roman numeral 1,2 & 3 of our table of contents? > > Or, do we create the table of contents based on our research and findings? ANSWER: Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 19:22:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Gunter Krumme Subject: Re: First Paper Thanks for asking. I want those categories considered as content suggestions not as a mandate for a structure. Ultimately, it is the structure of your approach which should govern the outline and the sequence of discussions in your paper. GK
Return to
Geog 450 ||
Econ & Bus Geog
2000 [econgeog@u.washington.edu]